Hey America: Here’s A Glimpse At Peaceful Life In Australia Since It Banned Assault Weapons

The shooting in San Bernardino, California marked the 355th mass shooting in the U.S. this year — or more than one per day on average so far in 2015 — according to groups monitoring such attacks in recent years. As much as I never want to accept stronger hurricanes as the new “normal,” it is still much easier than accepting gun massacres as the new “normal.” Both of which, I might add, are something our Republican Congress wants to do nothing about.

But Australia appears to be run by adults who understand the issues with assault weapons.

So you know how America has had countless gun shootings, including the murdering of school children and we all go to our respective corners and nothing gets done since the NRA owns Congress? Well, Australia is the total opposite. Ever since experiencing its most brutal gun shooting in history in the 1990 Port Arthur Massacre, Australia’s government banned assault weapons. As a result, no one has died from a mass-shooting on Australian soil today for the 7158th day in a row.

Screw Canada! Let’s all run away to Australia. After all, they have kangaroos (none of whom are armed).

Christina Upton, a cinema employee in Australia, was in awe at the fact that it has been more than 19 years since a heavily armed white Australian male murdered 35 people for no reason. Naturally, she feels the decades of peace is “probably” because the Australian government decided to strip her of a God-given right to own weapons that would make John Rambo blush.

Yeah, I mean the Yanks come across as sick people. This year there have been more mass shootings in America than calendar dates… But it wasn’t that long ago that Australia had postal workers holding their entire office hostage with AR-15s.

Upton tends to think that God-given rights play a bigger role in America’s mass shootings than Americans might think.

I don’t think America should be so hard on itself about the mental state of thousands of lonely white virgins. We have those people too.

The fact is that ammosexuals, their lust for guns and the Republican cowards in Congress willing to do the NRA’s bidding are extremely loud. So we just have to be louder if we want to stem the bleeding in America. You know, like our democratic neighbor down under has done and with much success.

Featured image via HJL @Flickr and modified by Michael Hayne of IfYouOnlyNews.com

michael hayne headshotedited111 Michael is a comedian/VO artist/Columnist extraordinaire. Follow him on Twitter, Facebook, and ImpressionsGuy.com

  • Ian Thomson

    USA since 1975 to 2015. 11 deaths per 100,000.
    Australia 1975 to 2015 1 death per 100,000.
    “But Australia appears to be run by adults who understand the issues with assault weapons.”

    Paranoia is NOT an Australian problem.
    It is a problem for people who are so paranoid and afraid they feel they need guns to protect them in their own country.
    Gimme’ a break. Wake up !!!!

    • Airb0rne4325

      Really, paranoia is not a problem. Ever heard of Operation Sovereign Border? Of course you haven’t. It is where they don’t allow anyone into their country unless they go through an extensive vetting process. All the boat people that try to come into their country get turned around. Guess how many boat people they had after they put that little gem into effect? You are right about one thing. I wish we had more duets running this country and looked out for the good of our people instead of their own political agendas.

  • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

    Yet another entirely dishonest “analysis” from libturd central here. Funny how you forgot to mention what Australia’s murder rates look liked BEFORE their gun buyback in 1994. Here’s a hint: EXACTLY THE SAME. The Australian government reports that their gun buyback had ZERO effect on crime rates in that country.

    The “NRA owns congress,” eh? Ok then, who owns the NRA? Here’s a hint, it’s the at least 58% of Americans that view them in a favorable light and that vote out the bums that are trying to curtail our rights.

    http://www.gallup.Com/poll/186284/despite-criticism-nra-enjoys-majority-support.aspx

    • Bruce Marks

      religion&politics…

      1st u r usurping the name of a very respectable and thoughtful site whose motto is ‘fit for polite company’ that belies ur less than polite response. i WILL be alerting them regarding ur wrongful use of their name.

      2nd ur non sequitor of who owns the nra is used to misdirect from the main point of this country’s legal misinterpretation of the meaning of the second amendment which started to change in the 70’s with decisions from scotus.

      u mention ur rights: the right for every citizen to live with out fear of being murdered by a lawful gun owner supersedes ur right to own any fire arm.

      unlike u i’m willing to be contacted to continue the conversation in a reasonable and rational fashion.

      also i see from ur profile u spend an inordinate amount of time responding to various right winged issues (15675 to be exact…the 41133 up votes ARE NOT for u but for the r & p site…i would guess u think those r for u or at least u hope those who do check ur profile assume that). this should also be brought to the attention of this site as well as r & p. imo because u continually find causes/comments u disagree with in some of the most offensive language, i do fear u r likely to be one of those mentally unstable gun owners who would enjoy killing those u disagree with as a genuine threat to the illusion of the good ol’ ‘merica u hold most dear.

    • religion&politics

      o the little pus sy that posted a silly little rant, then erased it and ran away, I offered the following rebuttal:

      awwww, how sweet! You go ahead an “alert” all you want.

      Just FYI, I’ve had this same account just early 2013 before the Zimmerman/Martin trial, and all my comments and upvotes are my own. NONE of them have anything at all to do with the R&P site, you should know that, Disqus doesn’t work that way.

      legal misinterpretation of the meaning of the second amendment which started to change in the 70’s with decisions from scotus.

      Really? I though this “misinterpretation” started in 1875 with US v Cruikshank in which the INDIVIDUAL right to bear arms was protected from federal government interference. Gee, but I guess you and your vague little references know better, eh?

      Lastly, learn to write and spell, please. Reading your writing is painful on the eyes.

      • Bruce Marks

        “There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.”

        ― Isaac Asimov