Jan Brewer’s Rant Against Marriage Equality Is Made Uglier By The Response Of A McCain

Gov. Jan Brewer spewed out a lot of hatred toward marriage equality as soon as her toady attorney general, Tom Horne, gave up the fight to ban same-sex weddings. The amusing fact is, after all the frantic legislative efforts to enshrine prejudice into Arizona law this year, Brewer and her fellow Republicans are on the losing end of the issue — especially when it comes to public opinion.

Once Tom Horne conceded that the ban against same-sex marriage is, and will remain, unconstitutional, he issued a most gratifying statement. Although he, too, disagreed with the judicial opinion, he immediately sent a letter to all 15 of Arizona’s county clerks on Friday that was short, sweet, and to the point:

Effective immediately, the clerks of Arizona county Superior Courts cannot deny a marriage license to any otherwise eligible licensees on the grounds that the license permits a marriage between persons of the same sex.

Brewer, on the other hand, went on a full-on rant against the ruling issued by US District Court Judge John Sedwick. She released the following statement:

It is not only disappointing, but also deeply troubling, that unelected federal judges can dictate the laws of individual states, create rights based on their personal policy preferences and supplant the will of the people in an area traditionally left to the states for more than two hundred years.

Simply put, courts should not be in the business of making and changing laws based on their personal agendas. It is not the role of the judiciary to determine that same-sex marriages should be allowed.

Historically and traditionally, that power belongs to the states, and to the people. If society wants to recognize same-sex marriage or civil unions, that decision should be made through our elected representatives or at the ballot – not the courts.

Talk about a personal agenda! Brewer has been on a tear against marriage equality for a long time. But what’s really deeply troubling is that she, the top elected official of the state of Arizona, seems to have no concept of the judicial system’s role in protecting the rights of the minority against the tyranny of the majority. Equally troubling is that the governor is also out of touch with her public. In a poll taken six months ago, 49% of Arizonans approved of marriage equality, compared to 41% who disapproved. The figures have no doubt continued to shift in favor of equality, but Brewer pays scant attention to information that puts her in the wrong.

Fortunately, in other, non-governmental quarters, the response to the change in Arizona’s marriage laws has been overwhelmingly positive. For months, the business community has been enthusiastically preparing for the day gay marriage would become legal. Phoenix’s famed historic venue, the Wrigley Mansion, has long been planning a contest for Oct. 27th, called ‘I Do With A View, Same-sex Wedding Giveaway.’ When the public relations executive in charge, Ty Largo, heard Friday’s news, he said:

It’s a crazy turn of events. The ruling came through my Twitter feed and blew me out of my chair.

Clergy members flocked to marriage license offices around the state on Friday, to be available to couples wanting an immediate ceremony. The Rev. John Dorhauer, leader of the United Church of Christ in Arizona, conducted one of the first weddings. He said:

This was maybe my most important moment in 26 years of ministry. The joy I felt after decades of advocacy was unutterable. I was fighting back tears of pride and joy.

But one of the most satisfying reactions to Friday’s development came from a McCain. Not from Brewer buddy, Sen. John McCain, who has vowed to never accept gay marriages, but from his daughter, Meghan. Although a Republican, Meghan has been a vocal supporter of marriage equality. She’s also described how lonely it is to be a Republican in that position. As the news was released, she didn’t disappoint, immediately tweeting:

Marriage equality is now legal in my home state of Arizona!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! F*** yes, finally!!!!!!!

So take that, Jan Brewer … and John McCain! Arizona is in a celebratory mood, in spite of your hatefulness. The joy will only build as another great day draws near. In January, the woman known as the wicked witch of the west will no longer be governor of Arizona. F*** yes, finally!

 

Photo by Gage Skidmore

Send to Kindle
  • Jenna Duffy

    I went rounds with an old childhood friend because she wrote, “Sad day for Arizona, lord please forgive us!” And said she was feeling ashamed. So I, as nicely as a lifelong friend can, told her I was ashamed of her. I had no idea she was this kind of bigot. She’s a religious nut though, and thinks God will punish us all for this. I told her, “Someday it’s going to be legal in all 50 states and guess what? The sun will still rise the next morning.”

    Then someone chimed in with, “Well if everyone decided to be gay the world wouldn’t exist,” and I blew a gasket.

    As for Brewer, I can’t stand the logic. Our state did decide with voters initially, it’s just that there are higher courts to appeal to because that’s how our system works. If the law you sign goes to a higher court and is found to be unconstitutional, then the law was obviously wrong. This isn’t something that was usurped, it was scrutinized and argued over for years.

    It was a happy day, but it remains WE HAVE GAY MARRIAGE IN OUR STATE WOOHOO!!

    Great piece, Debbie!

    • Jane Crusader

      Eat sh!t you old bag! Can’t WAIT to see her ass end heading out the door!

      • Orionsangel

        The good thing is these dinosaurs don’t have to evolve. They’re not the future. They’re the past. The world is moving forward with change whether they like it or not.

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      YEAH, we do! :)

  • Stacey W

    I have new respect for Meghan McCain. If the Republican party is going to survive, it will be because of a new generation like her. They need to wise up and start taking notes.

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      It’ll be interesting to see what young people do in regard to the GOP. Seems like they may dry up and blow away — or am I fantasizing?

      • Steve Brinkhoff

        You are not fantasizing. Many of the things the current GOP stands for are of no concern to the majority of today’s young people - like gay marriage and blocking immigration reform. And much of what they stand for is actively hostile to them - the refusal to act on student loan relief while giving welfare to big business, and the endless effort to prevent them from getting affordable health care. Demographics are definitely not in the GOP’s favor. Every reasonable-sounding candidate is vilified by the Tea Party, and few of the ‘moderates’ have the guts to stand up to them, while basing them behind the scenes.

    • Serene Queiruga

      It wasn’t too long ago that the Republican party transformed into this insane group of morons. At one point, southern democrats were the equivalent of what Republicans are today! It is interesting to see the differences of the past. Is it wrong for me to be extremely happy that she isn’t united with her father in this aspect?

    • Marie

      Reply to Stacey W:

      Given the new Republicans taking over, The Meghan McCains of the world will eventually become democrats. The time for sensible Republicans is over. All we have now are petulant children spewing racist, hate speech to cause fear and discomfort to an uneducated population. Their constituents believe that our President is a Muslim terrorist, trying to instill communism and making the world unlivable for the white man…oh, and kill babies.

      There will either be a new party for young Republicans or they will become Democrats. For the love of God, I hope whatever way it goes, it happens soon because I simply cannot stand to read anymore about these Tea Party Republicans. Respect and logic have been replaced by hate and fear. This bag of goo (I mean, the Arizona Governor) is a perfect example.

  • hoser

    In defense of McCain…….. I don’t think Palin should have been given permission to marry either.

    • Jane Crusader

      She should have been sterilized at birth!

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      :D

    • Deb Bryant

      …or Palin shouldn’t have been able to reproduce—the apples didn’t fall that far from the tree, evidently.

  • Pingback: Jan Brewer vs. Meghan McCain | Comments From The Peanut Gallery()

  • T.J. Thomas

    If Brewer really cared about religious freedom, she would have encouraged Arizona’s legislature to let Arizona’s churches decide individually what they wanted to do about gay marriage, and then stand behind their religious freedom to do so. But folks like Brewer aren’t interested in the people deciding on their own if those people might go against what the politicians want them to do.

    • Travis

      Why the churches? Churches have no more right than voters and the governor dictating basic civil rights for all human beings.

  • Fbear0143

    I am ever perplexed at how many of our government are so ignorant of the Us\S Constitution’s provisions, TO WHICH ALL STATES ARE A PARTY BY VIRTUE OF THEIR BEING STATES. There is no such thing as legislation by unelected or “activist” judges except when they actually DO make laws by creating people out of corporations, as was done by what is supposed to be a wise and politically neutral body. But they are supposed to INTERPRET the law that the 14th amendment gives equal protection to all actual PEOPLE, born essentially the same way, is absolutely valid from the standpoint of the law. The whole idea of the amendment was to prevent the legislating of BIGOTRY against anyone. Brewer and her kind do not grasp this simple concept, nor the other simple on that in a number of matters, The US Constitution trumps the laws of every time, if the state law is contrary to the rights granted to AMERICANS as opposed to those supposedly restricting mere residents of a state. Therefore, Brewer is apparently WILLFULLY ignorant, which makes her, in short, STUPID

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      Thumbs up to that!

    • Serene Queiruga

      I don’t think the only issue here is that SHE is ignorant. With all right wingers, they all seem to have this way of influencing morons (voters) to do their bidding. The real problem this country is facing is that the voters either don’t vote, or they vote against their own political and economic interests. It is much easier to believe the lies that are spewed throughout the media, than to look up the constitution and study it for themselves. Mind you, there are plenty of level headed voters that know their basic rights & that use their voice to make a difference, but there are also those in the opposite spectrum that don’t know anything about United States history.

  • Patrick

    does Gov. Brewer similarly object to the Supreme Court granting corporations the same “personal” rights as citizens?

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      The LGBT community must not have lined her pockets.

      • Serene Queiruga

        That is the statement of the year, Deborah!

  • Suzanne

    Dear Ms Brewer,

    Even my Tea Party neighbors think you are an ugly human being. I concur.

    Signed,
    1 Liberal Democrat

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      It IS amazing how even people on the far right don’t defend her, isn’t it?

  • longtail

    Governor Brewer may dislike alternative lifestyles, and that’s okay, but she’s not actually allowed to step on other people’s rights.

    • http://thepoliticali.blogspot.com Deborah Montesano

      Right. Not a hard concept to grasp, one would think, but the far right amazes me every day with their lack of understanding of our government.

  • Richard House

    Jan Brewer doesn’t even understand the concept of respecting others. Look at how she treated our President elect.

    She loves herself some attention though. Look how long it took her to Veto the right to be a gay bigot law. Wagging a finger in the face of our Commander in Chief like she is someone way more important than she is. It’s like a bench player demanding to be put in for the game deciding play who hasn’t played all game. She has no clue as to her insignificance.

    • Elizabeth

      She has no respect for the highest office in the land, can you imagine how much of a hissy fit she would throw if it was the other way around?

  • Serene Queiruga

    Marriage equality should never be about Democrats or Republicans. Of course, Republicans seem to be the ones that oppose any kind of equality in ‘Civil Rights’, but this is a personal issue and not one that should ever have to be debated or opposed within Government. Arizona is a very racist & homophobic state (mostly politicians), so I’m very happy that the decision was forced upon those who blindly deny the basic fundamental right.

  • Matt Phillips

    If it had been left up to the people, women still wouldn’t have the right to vote and Brewer wouldn’t be governor.

    • Matt Phillips

      Many might argue that the people spoke through the congress and state legislatures in the process of delivering the right to vote to women. Can we sit here now and even imagine that half the adult population of this country used to not be allowed to vote because of their gender? The marriage equality issue is at its base the same story and the same fight.

  • Phil

    This woman will be gone soon enough and hasn’t the brain power to score any sort of job where she will have any political influence. However the usual punishment from my watching the Wizard of Oz is they have a house dropped on them. Sadly that has not been the case with the Wicked Witch of the Desert Southwest. Begone, Brewer, you have no powers here.

  • Bill

    I know… off topic, but her eyes are totally freaking me out!

  • Orionsangel

    The good thing is these dinosaurs don’t have to evolve. They’re not the future. They’re the past. The world is moving forward. They’re going away.

  • Janey

    Great article up until the sexist last line. Wow. Seriously?!

  • Denise

    Gawd, I can’t stand Brewer! There is so much wrong with the backward state of AZ as it is. She’s a huge part of that and one of the determining factors that drove us out of the state. She’s the epitome of hate and bigotry.

    • Elizabeth

      She looks hateful.

  • Lala

    So, it seems that Governor Brewer really needs a junior high civics refresher course, because she obviously doesn’t understand the actual set up of our government or legal system. Maybe Arizona should consider having a basic Civics test for potential candidates before their next election.

  • Fiesty Magoo

    I think the real reason Ty Largo was blown out of his chair was that Tom Horne was servicing him.

  • Terry

    Jan Brewer is right up there with Wisconsin’s Scott Walker and Texas’s Rick Perry. All three are terrible excuses as governors. I’ve never referred to Brewer as an asshole like the other two are so truly are but she is in the same category. Be nice for the country to be rid of all three of them!

    • klangston25

      I would add Mary Fallin from my home state of Oklahoma to that list. I was born in Oklahoma but moved to Las Vegas when I was 12 and lived there for more than 25 years. Last year I moved back to Oklahoma. It is so bizarre to go from a purple state like Nevada (although Clark County where Las Vegas is much more liberal than the rest of the state) to a deep red state like Oklahoma. Even the Democratic candidate for governor brags about how conservative he is.

  • Canuck

    Why do some straight people care if gay people get married? How does it affect them? Marriage is about pair-bonding, commitment, and social recognition. Why are they so threatened?

    I’ve never heard an argument against allowing it that makes any sense.

    We’ve been listening to hateful condemnation of the the “gay lifestyle” for decades based on very specific stereotypes - going on about how the lifestyle is unhealthy.

    So now, they want to get married and be monogamous… but they can’t do that either?

    It’s idiotic. Gay people can get married - accept it and worry about something that actually affects you instead of trying to trample on the rights and happiness of people you don’t even know.

    • Jan Calloway

      I am not supporting the idiots against people marrying whoever they like, my only point is its not straights that are against it, its the religious and ignorant.

      • Canuck

        You’re right… well adjusted straight people don’t have an issue with it.

      • linnyqat

        Actually my 73 year old mom is not at all religious - she raised us, for a time, in the United Church (in Canada - a fairly liberal denomination), until she got tired of rousing us out of bed on Sundays. She stopped going herself and hasn’t done or said anything remotely religious in years. And yet, she is adamant that same-sex unions not be called “marriage”. She does think they should have all the same legal protections that a marriage allows, but does not want to share the term.

        When pressed, she just kept saying, “it’s not the same thing!” I told her she was being homophobic and that made her cry. Anyway, all this to say, some people oppose it for non-religious reasons, even people who would think of themselves as liberal in most respects. I think it is more generational, though, and attitudes like hers are quickly dying off, as her demographic does…

        • Elizabeth

          I’m close to her age and never had and still don’t have a problem with it…don’t understand why anyone does?? Don’t make your Mom cry though…..

          • linnyqat

            Well I did feel pretty bad about that part. I haven’t brought it up since :)

    • The Olympian

      Fear? Ignorance? Improper parenting (by their parents)? There are a lot of reasons why they do not like marriage equality.

    • Angela

      Simple. She has the right to live as she pleases and everyone else has the right to live as she pleases.

      • Canuck

        What is that supposed to mean? If everyone has the right to live as they please why does she care if they get married? Why doesn’t she STFU and mind her own business?

        • Angela

          I think maybe you should re-read what I said. Problem with judgmental people like her is they they can’t understand that everyone has their own views and ideas, they think that anyone who doesn’t think or live the way they do is doing something wrong. More than that, people like her think that people who don’t live as she does should be corrected and she probably thinks it’s doing them a favor.

          • Canuck

            Sorry.. I did miss the nuance in what you wrote. I agree and it underlines the point that nobody can explain why it affects them in any way if gay people are allowed to get married.

          • Elizabeth

            It doesn’t affect them, but it does affect government, insurance companies and some employers who might have to dole out extra benefits and they in turn try to turn this into a religious or this is going to ruin your life and marriage thing for their own greedy purposes….end of story, nothing more in reality and for that reason if nothing more is why this has to stop and LGBT people should have the same rights as everyone else.

    • RON_KING

      Start with hating the very concept of “same-sex” sex, then add opposition to treating “them” as anything other than “free targets” for every complaint you might have in life, then add “religious” justification for classifying “them” as “not human” and thus worthy of dignity and rights of a free citizen. Mix it all in with paranoia and a sense of persecution and you get “Martha! Git yur GUN cuz them Gays are coming to rape you and our dog!”

    • JR

      Look at Jan Brewer, she hasn’t been laid in years. If she’s not getting any then neither is anyone else.

    • Fred Powell

      I have been saying pretty much the same thing for years. I couldn’t care less if they marry, but I’ll bet it means a lot to them.

  • John

    “A full-on rant against marriage equality”? If you read Brewer’s statement, she doesn’t even mention her opposition to marriage equality. She simply says that this is a decision that should be left to the people and their representatives - not the courts. I would hardly call that “spewing out hatred.” Be fair to the opposition, who still make up some 40% of Arizonans.

    • Jan Calloway

      so if the people wants a law that discriminates against people and is unconstitutional and it is one of the over 50 states and regions of the USA, you are all for it?

    • Jay Winston

      There is nothing to oppose here. Would it be acceptable for someone to oppose equality For someone of a different race? For someone of a different ethnic background? A different religion? Someone with special needs? The answer is absolutely not. It is so frustrating to me that people find this issue of gay marriage or, as I put it, Equality for same-sex couples, to be one that they have a right to oppose. No matter what you believe personally, opposition toward fairness and equality for all people is simply not an acceptable argument.

    • Michael Hallmark

      How would you feel about a statewide referendum on a woman’s right to vote? Do you think that’s an issue “that should be left up to the people and their representatives”? Or segregated schools or lodging?

      Rights don’t get to be voted on. They only get to be reaffirmed by judges who have an obligation to do what our constitution already mandates.

    • DeborahMontesano

      She talks about judges ‘creating rights’ based on ‘personal policy preferences’ — as if people who are gay don’t have rights — and further that the courts are basing their decisions on ‘personal agendas’. If that isn’t hateful toward the gay community, I don’t know what is.

    • The Olympian

      The claim that Judges should not get involved in any issue means that you interpret that issue as a political issue and not one of Civil Rights. I agree that judges should not get involved in political issues, but judges have been at the forefront of all civil rights issues. She is saying that she does not believe that this is a civil rights issue. Of course, that is pure ignorance, stupidity, and poor parenting brought to the front…

    • plantwomyn

      This decision about what John? You claim that we should “be fair to the opposition”
      yet you find it necessary to obfuscate the opposition’s position. Brewer premise,
      that the courts are basing their rulings on a “personal agenda” or “personal
      policy preferences” is not only obtuse, it’s false. Brewer goes on to insist
      that “It is not the role of the judiciary to determine that same-sex marriages should be allowed” when it was her administration that asked the federal judiciary to do just that. All the while ignoring the fact that the Constitutional mandate of the judiciary is to determine whom is included under the protection of the Constitution and to insure that our laws are adjudicated fairly and equally.

      Nowhere in the state of Arizona’s brief does it claim that the federal courts have no jurisdiction over marriage laws. In addition, federal courts have historically ruled on state marriage laws dozens of times. So, Brewer is playing to her ill-informed base when she denies empirical facts.

      So fairness goes both ways and requires that we acknowledge the TRUTH about our positions. Brewer has to lie to herself and her citizens in order to express her opinion. If she has convinced 40% of the population of Arizona that her lies are the truth, it says more aboutthe citizens of Arizona than it says about the 60% that are on the right side of history. Pretending that Brewer’s statement isn’t about marriage equality is ludicrous and positing that claim makes your post irrelevant.

      • John

        The belief that “it is not the role of the judiciary to determine that same-sex marriages should be allowed” is legitimate. In fact, the only time the Supreme Court has ruled on a state marriage law was Baker v. Nelson (1971). The Court dismissed the case for “want of a substantial federal question.” Clearly, federal courts are not following that decision, or are distinguishing it, but the belief that the courts should stay out of the debate is not disingenuous or untruthful. I suspect there are at least four justices on the Supreme Court who would agree. But I suppose all of that is besides the point - the real point here is that marriage equality supporters tend to demonize their opponents, as this post shows. They claim they “spew out hatred” and are bigots if they give the smallest hint of opposing marriage equality. That is not a healthy political discourse and will tend to harden people in their beliefs.

        • plantwomyn

          John you’ve omitted over a dozen rulings over the last 100+ years. Loving v. Virginia being the most famous. You also fail to take into consideration the FACT that after 1971 DOMA and Lawrence v. Texas and Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry ALL created “a substancial federal question.
          Once a law is codified it becomes inherently reviewable by the federal courts. Pretending that instead of cases being filed, the SCOTUS somehow demanded to have a voice in “the debate” is most definitely disingenuous and untruthful.
          What is also disingenuous is pretending that this is merely a difference of opinion and those that oppose marriage equality at this point aren’t already hardened in their beliefs.
          After decades codifying hardened beliefs into law, after fighting in the courts, after loosing thousands of our brothers and sisters before they could enjoy full equal citizenship, NOW, NOW you want to make nice and have “healthy political discourse.
          Too late.

  • Jan Calloway

    “It is not only disappointing, but also deeply troubling, that unelected federal judges can dictate the laws of individual states”. They would not had to get the Federal courts involved if they simply abided by the lower courts decision, either way they lost.

  • estfar

    Jan Brewer is like most of her party and the pundits they buy, a woman whose head has been perpetually stuck up her own A- -. Let’s hope she will eventually simply end up in eldercare and not sitting in the highest seat in her state.

  • Max Headroom

    The only thing I find offensive and objectionable about this case, is Meghan McCain’s spelling.

    • Michael Hallmark

      What’s wrong with her spelling?

  • Elisabeth Shaw

    I really wish someone (maybe a gay undocumented immigrant) would do something about the grand canyons in her face.

  • Vince Vuong

    Jan Brewer is white trash. I’m a Republican and she is white trash to me. No understanding of the rule of law and how federalism affects the state’s powers. You’re a governor for pete’s sake. If she could have her way, Mexicans would be in concentration camps and blacks would still be segregated. That is HER conception of the rule of law and she is just white trash that needs to be taken off this Earth by our good and loving God. Period. No Joke — I pray that people like her die off so we can re-purify the Republican Party of internal stupidity.

    • Skeptical Cat

      Your prayer for her death is amusing, perhaps you would be better served worshiping a different god?

      • Vince Vuong

        And what? You worship the Devil? I don’t know who you are but I have done a lot of good in my life, given to charity, used God’s name only in the most positive light. I get my flaws but don’t try to weigh your version of holiness against mine. Cause at least I am looking out for humanity while you’re looking out for your political interests and God is always on the side of the good.

        • A. Neumann

          I’m pretty sure what Skeptical Cat was saying is, praying for someone’s death, even a troll like Jan Brewer, is not very Christ like. And isn’t that who you Christians claim to follow and emulate?

          • Vince Vuong

            I am more worried about how dirty and trashy the Republican Party has gotten because of people like Jan Brewer mouthing off about the law when she has no idea about how the rule of law is established. She to me is worse than Hitler and is not part of the Republican Party. She is not a Christian. She knows nothing about Christianity — she is like the Devil, she will say anything to win votes while sacrificing everyone’s souls in Gods eyes to the Devil for her own political gain.

          • A. Neumann

            And this is exactly why religion does not belong in politics. You equate the Republican Party with “true” Christianity and since Jan B. does not fit into your idea of what that is, she should be summarily executed. The rule of law says that, in this country you are allowed to say any stupid thing that you want and if you are a politician saying stupid stuff, you are removed with ballots not bullets. Your concern for the Republican Party reminds me of the “true believers” concerns that the Taliban is becoming corrupted. When religion ruled the world, it was called the Dark Ages.

          • Joy Milligan

            “Cause at least I am looking out for humanity while you’re looking out for your political interests and God is always on the side of the good.”

            “I am more worried about how dirty and trashy the Republican Party has gotten because of people like Jan Brewer mouthing off about the law when she has no idea about how the rule of law is established. She to me is worse than Hitler and is not part of the Republican Party.”

            Contradict yourself much, Mr. Vuong?

          • Vince Vuong

            She is not Republican. She is a Tea Partier. Please separate the two because having some new-age form of Hitler be called a Republican is an insult to the GOP. God help America when she starts putting people in concentration camps cause she says it is the rule of law — the leathery football knows nothing about the law…

    • Jeff Bowles

      Most of the GOP front-men and front-women are white trash with fake power.

  • Chuck Reeser

    My feeling is if don’t agree with theses clowns vote vote vote

  • con-hunter

    “It is not only disappointing, but also deeply troubling, that unelected federal judges can dictate the laws of individual states, create rights based on their personal policy preferences and supplant the will of the people in an area traditionally left to the states for more than two hundred years.

    Simply put, courts should not be in the business of making and changing laws based on their personal agendas. It is not the role of the judiciary to determine that interracial marriages should be allowed.

    Historically and traditionally, that power belongs to the states, and to the people. If society wants to recognize interracial marriage that decision should be made through our elected representatives or at the ballot – not the courts.”

    Jan brewer if she was a man 50 years a go (cuz ladies aint up to bing guvners)

  • The Olympian

    You know, I prefer to think of their opposition not as hate, but as intellectual backwardness. I tend to not prescribe bad intention when ignorance and improper raising works just as well.

  • Kelly Tracy

    Please people VOTE! We need to get rid of these people, most of all Cathi Herrod who is the crazy person that convinces our top into all these stupid laws. If you don’t know who she is, please read up on her. She spews hate under the guise of a true Christian. Doug Ducey is all wrapped up with her so please find out what she is like and then think real hard about Ducey and Brnovich. Cathi Herrid is the one that lobbied and pushed through SB1062!

  • Jim Rome

    Jan Brewer can’t help it if the people she represents are bigots. She’s not supposed to guide them on principles of fairness and reason. Oh, wait.

  • Rogue Chimp

    What’s equally appalling is that the governor is not only hateful, but is completely clueless that the judge made the decision in accordance with the Constitution - the law as conceived by elected representatives. Republicans are miserable nitwits.

  • Jim

    After seeing the video of this rude, arrogant, bitch, Jan Brewer sticking her finger in President Obama’s face at an airport in Arizona, I thought the secret service should have painted a target on her back with the words ‘Arizona Governor” in the center and dropped her off over the border in Nogales, Mexico at 2 in the morning. Mean spirited, nasty assholes like Brewer should never wind up in government.

    • Elizabeth

      Let’s not forget how they get there though!

      • Jim

        Right, sometimes they win elections. And then, sometimes like with GW Bush in 2000 in Florida, they steal elections. Then there’s the old tried and true American method of buying elections. This is what Republicans refer to as the right to choose.

  • Stephen Geraci

    Great article thank you.

  • Seriously

    This is an issue that gets used to stir the political pot, so that politicians can avoid dealing with the real issues. Who cares who marries whom…live and let live.

  • Janet Burr

    It is the same old story. They are afraid it’s catching.

  • Justin Russell

    14th Amendment to the US Constitution Section one. Pay CLOSE attention to the last part:

    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
    and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
    States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
    enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
    citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
    life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
    person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Then a gain with a state constitution with a preamble that states can one truly expect anything but idiots to get voted in?:

    We the people of the State of Arizona, grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do
    ordain this Constitution.

    Look folks… The First Amendment of the Constitution allows for personal Freedom of Religion… but it also states that the government shall NOT impose religious beliefs on the people. This is a DEMOCRACY not a THEOCRACY. Want a theocracy, ight I suggest moving to Iran?

  • BryantTucker

    I wouldn’t wish marriage upon anyone.

    • Lisa Irwin

      My husband and I always say they have every right to be as miserable as the rest of us. :)

  • Joel

    I love it when people cite that the judges are “unelected.” We have this system in this country. You don’t hear that when judges rule in a way that these people support.

  • gschloff55

    Man she is such a hypocrite. She doesn’t think it’s right for the higher-ups to tell the states what to do, but she wants to rule over the people of Arizona and push *her* assinine agenda.

  • http://ericinmiami.blogspot.com Eric Vasallo

    Very well written

  • wendy k rasmussen

    Don’t call her a witch…it’s demeaning to us pagans and real witches. <|:(

  • Vergent Bill

    If you do not agree with SSM, you do not have to RSVP.

  • Paul Dourlet

    With a 50 % divorice what the hell is holy about marriage in America ?Should not matter to people one way or another.

  • Kyara Peacock

    A Republican I can actually respect. A HUGE rarity for me! You go Meghan McCain!

  • xvet

    I would think she would be happy since it will cut the number of abortions.

  • Veritas1965

    I think it’s overkill to say she went on a hate-filled rant. What she stated is simply her opinion, nothing more. What she may feel in her heart is another matter, one we can easily speculate about at another time in other circumstances. She simply asserted state’s rights. That is not inherently a “hateful” thing to do. We in the gay community (myself included) need to use the word “hate” judiciously, otherwise we come off as branding — labeling — demonizing — anyone who might disagree with certain positions we’d like to see go a certain way. I don’t like this woman any more than any decent human being does, but she does have a right to express an opinion without being called a hater by the media.

  • Robert Davis

    The argument of “States Rights” in this case, is no different than the outdated “Jim Crowe Laws” in the south.
    A law that violates the rights of an individual.. whether it is approved by the people of that state or not… is unlawful. That is the only reason why the federal judges even had the right to step in. Someone like John McCain… who considered himself and old-school libertarian.. in the same steps as Barry Goldwater should have known that. (Though I guess Barry followed his libertarian ideals right out of the oval office because of his refusal to support the civil rights act… so probably not.)
    Point is, it doesn’t matter what state it is. (And I live in one of those Defense of Marriage act states)… if the law violates those rights… it’s dead in the water regardless of how many people in the state support the denial or rights to ‘those people.’