GOP Senator’s Tactics On Iran Approval Bill Screw Over His Fellow Republicans

Senator Tom Cotton’s (R-Ark.) efforts to derail the bi-partisan, Congressional review bill for any agreement reached with Iran are failing, along with Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-Fla.). Both parties in the Senate have agreed that debate on the bill is over, though, despite many other amendments not making it to the floor for a vote thanks to Cotton’s efforts. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky,) is expected to finish up consideration of the bill, freeing it from partisan gridlock.

According to Politico, Cotton tried to force a vote on an amendment of his that would have required Iran to disclose the history of its nuclear program and shut everything down. Given that the U.N. negotiations aren’t heading in that direction, such an amendment would have caused President Obama to veto the bill.

In other words, Cotton still doesn’t understand how this works, and he clearly doesn’t understand that the U.S. is working with other countries that are part of the U.N. to reach a deal with Iran. Cotton seems to think that the whole thing is between just the U.S. and Iran, and that Congress can influence what Iran will ultimately be required to do in return for lifting economic sanctions.

Rubio wanted to require that Iran formally recognize Israel as a state. It was Cotton that derailed that, too. Democrats were starting to consider how to accommodate Rubio’s amendment, but Cotton pushed Democrats away from considering any further amendments. Because of that, even McConnell couldn’t ask for a vote on Rubio’s Israel amendment.

Republicans were hoping to force Obama’s hand by shoving harsher instructions for the negotiations onto him. So Cotton’s tactic pretty much just screwed over fellow Republicans, because now that won’t happen either.

Politico reports that Sen. Bob Corker said he thought Cotton may finally understand the full impact of what he’d done after having to sit at a lunch with his colleagues as they found out they weren’t getting votes on their amendments. Cotton’s spokeswoman, however, says he was simply using “parliamentary tactics” to “fight for” stronger legislation.

So, it comes down to this: Cotton is just another maverick who thinks he sees a bigger picture, but really only sees what he wants to see. The true bigger picture doesn’t matter to him. He’s not only trying to cause problems for Obama, he’s also causing problems for his fellow Republicans. We don’t need more of this childishness. We need less.

Featured image: via Gage Skidmore. Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 via Flickr

Send to Kindle
  • Menmy3

    Would he PLEASE go back to the kiddie table??

  • grandpamike1

    Thank you Arkansas.

  • danielistical

    Iran has been chanting death to America since operation
    Ajax in 1953 when the United States overthrew the Iranian government and
    installed the SHAH untill the ShaH was
    overthrown Iran was one of the United states best allies in the middle east,, The nuclear
    program of Iran was launched in the 1950s with the
    help of the United States as part of the Atoms for Peace program. The participation
    of the United States and Western European governments in Iran’s nuclear program
    continued until the 1979 Iranian
    Revolution that toppled the Shah of Iran

    Iran never has and now do not have nuke weapons,,never
    have, They do not possess the technology, to build nuke weapons and they do not
    posses the material to build a nuke weapon,,,,Are you worried the Iran NAVY
    will attack?

    It is LIERS THAT
    PUPOSELY CONFUSE America,,THERE IS NO NUCLEAR WEAPON DEAL WITH ANYBODY,,, Iran
    wants Power for their homes and to run the country,,,,and JACKASSES like him try
    to make it something it is not

    Obama is working
    with Iran for Nukeular POWER FOR THEIR HOMES,,,not weapons,,,if you want to someone who is SELLING Iran that information FOR
    Nukclear weapons to Iran,,talk to HALIBURTON,,,

  • Phorie

    It’s not that he doesn’t see the big picture … it’s just that he has an inability to focus on it, perhaps standing too close or just has poor vision.