The owner of Florida Gun Supply has to be one of the worst faux patriots that exist today. This is the same guy who made a video advertisement talking about how he was not intolerant, then in the same video, went on to explain how Islamophobic he is. This is the same person who is raffling off confederate flag paintings by George Zimmerman.
All that aside, this latest stunt really takes the cake.
The not-intolerant owner of Florida Gun Supply wants you to use the coupon code “muslim” for $25 bucks off any gun, and a free car wash and beer.
What a great combination. Guns and beer. WHAT COULD GO WRONG?
FGS 911 Tweet. Photo: Twitter Screen Capture https://twitter.com/FLGunSupply/status/641702739769229312
Needless to say, this did not go as planned.
FGS Replies: Photo: Freakout Nation
But wait, there’s more.
Florida Gun Supply Replies. Photo: Freakout Nation
Wafiq really gets it:
How about coupon code ‘kkk’?
Andy Hallinan, the owner of Florida Gun Supply, can be seen in this original video where he made his first declaration of his store being a “Muslim free zone,” with a confederate flag backdrop. He also thinks that all Muslims are terrorists who hate America, Black Lives Matter is a domestic terror organization targeting whites, and racism was dead in America until Obama brought it back on purpose.
Seriously? Give it a rest.
while I understand this gun shop owner is clearly part of the problem, we will not change the insane things in this country or the planet with arguing . we need a new strategy, we have been showing example after example of how the right wing bigots, racists, fake Christians, misogynists, greedy , low life, Satanist degenerate haters are destroying the world. and it just keeps getting worse everyday. we need to figure out a way to actually change things. the right wingers will always vote for insane like minded morons thus we will always have republicans , conservatives, tea bagging idiots fighting for the Satanist agenda, we all need to vote to force them out, with all the redistricting, and gerrymandering there will always be republicans, but if we really make an effort to get every American out to vote we can take back the house, the senate and keep the white house. we would need to do this every election from electing state members to our governors to our mayors. if we did this every single election we wouldn’t have half the issues we have now with the obstruction, the wasting of trillions of dollars with fake outrage about this and that, we wouldn’t have a government shutdown every time we kept women and children safe, we wouldn’t have war at every turn due to republicans outsourcing our military to corrupt corporations like Halliburton, education wouldn’t be half dead in a coma due to republican greed and extreme ignorance, more renewable energy would be at the fore front of our energy policy, big oil and king coal wouldn’t be making record profits and still getting hundreds of billions of our tax dollars in government subsidies, we wouldn’t have insane and repulsive fake conspiracy theories concocted to spread the two things republican voters hold dear to them the most . FEAR AND HATRED. eventually the party would die off, there uneducated, toothless, racist, misogynist, degenerate voters would flee the county probably join up with ISIS or Al-Qaida. the world would be a much better and loving peaceful place. please vote these cowards out lets take our country back from the rich, the corporate scum, the lobbyists the special interests and the Satanists who have destroyed so much already. this is something we need to do every election cycle, mid terms as well. if there is an election we need to find the time to go out and vote. we can do this if we all agree on how to do it.
You’re part of the problem.
Pretending they’re “fake” and “Satanic” is just feeding their fire.
Own your own crazies before you start demanding that the rest of us own ours.
Step one is to get the money out of politics. Once the money is out, or mostly out, we can discuss the actual, real issues of our time without all the hormones polluting the discussion.
Spot on. Real campaign finance reform is our most pressing issue. Without that, nothing will ever change.
With American’s electing the GOP to Congress it will never happen. American’s have become lazy to much trouble to vote. Fox news keeps polishing the same turd and the stupid buy it at their own expense.
You hit the mark in pointing out that voter apathy by Dems and independents is the way the wingnuts get power. If we threw them all out, they’d still be there claiming victimhood for themselves and vowing revenge but at least they would be neutralized in what they could do. But recognize also who finances them, the self-serving billionaires who use social conflict as a smokescreen while they pass laws and budgets that enrich them beyond measure. Publicly funded elections are the antidote, but they can’t be passed until the good guys get in, and we’re back to voter apathy. Simply put, we need to vote in every election from dogcatcher (it’s the state/local officials that rig the election rules) to president and vote Democratic for all offices. Now let’s get out there and just do it!
“we need a new strategy”
FEMA re-education camps would be so much faster than the election process. Also, I wasn’t aware that Satanists were a big problem in the U.S. or anywhere else. You know, just because you don’t like someone, it doesn’t mean they worship Satan.
“Satanist agenda”?? Huh?
Funny, for a guy actually arguing a valid point, your execution could use some work. You start off with the very reasonable assertion that “we will not change the insane things in this country or the planet with arguing“, then proceed call Republicans/conservatives with the following names:
right wing bigots
racists (twice)
fake Christians
misogynists (twice)
greedy, low life, Satanist degenerate haters
tea bagging idiots
uneducated
toothless
degenerates
Way to practice what you preach there bub.
He’s just stating facts.
You wouldn’t know “facts” if they knocked you down and sat on your ugly face. The fact that Tea Party members are actually wealthier and better-educated than the general public, including you desperate libturds, really grates on you, huh?
If you’re an example of the Tea Party, I know you’re wrong on that one.
Nope, I don’t consider myself part of the Tea Party. I lean right on most issues, but I also lean left on a number of others.
You’re entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts. You really should stop spreading hatred, bigotry, and lies against the Tea Party.
Why lie?
I really don’t understand why you libturds insist on keeping up these lies that you know full well are lies. Perhaps it’s because you can’t win in an honest debate.
You don’t do honest debate. You’re a troll.
Uh huh. You are completely unable to ever adequately respond to the arguments I make on here, and after I shred yours, all you can do is start with the name-calling. You’re the true troll here, and a coward.
“Libturd”
The fact that you all are libturds IS my argument dumbass.
How about “tea bagger,” “tea turd,” “ammosexual,” “Republicunt,” “racist,” “bigot,” etc etc etc? I guess your use of these terms, that’s just fine, right?
Yep. That’s your argument, and that’s why you’re a troll.
This is only one of my many arguments, some of which center around the fact that this site is terrible, and only serves to spread hatred, bigotry and bile, but most of which center around debunking the lies you doofuses are telling. Your arguments are limited to “I HATE conservatives” and “Tea Baggers SUCK” and the like. I wonder if you’ve ever had an original thought in your life.
Well, you certainly haven’t proven anyone wrong on that.
Awwww, look at the little butthurt libturds … quite the “epic” Twitter smackdown, do you say? Yea, totally. All that whining “you’re disgusting” for offering a 9/11 coupon code and a weekend promotion is SOOO mature and so useful. No wonder you poor little cowardly libturds are losing the gun debate so badly in this country.
right because such a well thought out respectful post such as yours is always more dignified and reasonable, tell me can you make the same point without resorting to third grade name calling? i would be amazed if you could.
They just never got over the fact they lost in 2012. Can’t wait for the whining when they lose in 2016 too. Even with that FINE group of clowns running on the republican ticket. LMAO.
I doubt seriously.
Yeah… 2016… Right! LMAO! Which one, the criminal or the communist?!
Good luck with that fantasy take you’ve got there.
Have you ever heard or read anything any of them have to offer America?
And IF you think Hillary is a “criminal” then, shouldn’t Bush, Cheney, Rove and others be in jail for having used private email servers before she did? I say she should confess to total guilt and accept the exact “punishment” as the Bush admin got. NOTHING.
And IF you had read or heard anything about Bernie, you’d see HE has the only and best focus on the things American’s want addressed, FAR more intensely than abortion, guns, religion or more wars and tax cuts.
Clearly, you’re going for quantity over quality…
You are a deluded MORON.
Like this one?
Kinda like your ilk hasn’t gotten over your sound defeat in 2014, huh? Thanks to OBungler and all his screw-ups, the Republicans made historic gains in the house and senate, and as Savannah, Hillary’s anger translator said: “because [Obama] screwed the pooch six ways to Sunday. Folks just as soon vote for a skinned possum as a Democrat [in 2016].”
You seem to be confused that GOP victories in almost totally red districts and states does not make a “mandate” across the nation.
Check the polling of GOP ANYBODY vs Democrats. They TRAIL the Dems in Congress, and almost EVERY Democrat running for president out polls EVERY Republican. But please do enjoy your little fantasy, until 2016 and watch another landslide bury the mess you call “candidates”.
Hillary no longer holds the commanding lead she did, and her polling numbers are now on par with GOP leaders in many areas. Your little “analysis” is overly simplistic and stinks of partisan hackery. I don’t know how 2016 will turn out, but I DO know that in 2014 the country was sick to death of the Dems and their failed policies. I’m sure it will come around again to having the Dems in power, as it always does, but to pretend that the Republicans are somehow “on the run” and will be “decimated” in 2016 is just your wishful thinking. Go ahead and continue enjoying your little fantasy, trying to pretend that the HMS Hillary isn’t going down in flames, and that Crazy Boy Sanders actually stands a chance in the general election. The Dems haven’t won a third consecutive WH term since WWII, and they’re certainly not going to win it this time with the train wreck that is Hillary.
oh i know well why they have this tired rhetoric, the cannot understand why it is the obstructionism, and tantrums have not endeared them to the new crop of voters who love Bernie Sanders for speaking plainly of the problems in government today and offering actual solutions instead of pandering to one base or other with xenophobia or a world of possible, but instead real solutions and action backed up by decades of follow through.
Oh get over yourself. You DO realize that you’re on IYON, right? Have you seen the way your fellow libturds act here, see the awful things they’re always saying?
calling a moron like you a moron is a deserved reply. get over yourself
derp, derp … stfu libturd doofus
i know perfectly well what website i am on , i can read for myself, but i was also taught to be better than an average mouth breather usually produced by your side of the political isle, and not that it matters but i am a registered independent with moderate middle of the road values such as feeding the poor and letting serial rapists and killers ride the needle but then all you see is “a libral commin fer handouts” if you are indicative of your consevative utopia i am quite confident that you will lose time and time again …oh and one more thing if you are so against socialism then you should show it by cutting off every little thing that your government gives you …like roads, police, fire departments, public schools…. the list is pretty big so you might need a little time to prepare
Yawn, not really living up to what you were taught, eh libturd?
Nice deflection btw
considering it is all you seem to understand i thought i best to speak your language, neaderthal. nice attempt to look adequate.
also i love to see it itching in your ind that more of these readers are backing the point of view i offer, pity you cannot say the same.
Let us know when you grow up. Thanks!
Do you know the definition of liberal?
LOL. Not even close. Here’s a much better definition:
that defines you and the subject of this article
Maybe liberals are telling you this because you are racist, sexist, homophobic, islamophobic, xenophobic, inbred, redneck bible thumping, NASCAR loving, gun toting, America loving bigot? I can’t say for sure since I don’t know you.
But I do know there are conservatives that do believe those things and it’s the factual evidence that decides, not a silly meme.
You forgot proudly ignorant and poor spellers.
Uh huh. Your fellow libturds are doing an excellent job of showcasing both their ignorance and inability to spell even the simplest words in English:
Yeah, two spelling errors in one comment by one person indicates a trend. Or not. Just peruse any comment thread at Media Matters for America (Troll Central, unfortunately) and see for yourself why your selfservative tea-toddler buddies haven’t won a spelling bee since Dan Quayle’s gaffe in 92.
You’re right, one person alone does not prove a trend. However, I find it entirely ridiculous to suggest that conservatives in general are poorer spellers than liberals, or that they are less informed. These things are simply not true, and smack of partisan hackery and willful ignorance. For example, the Tea Party is actually comprised of people who are wealthier and better-educated than the general public, but the libturds refuse to accept this fact.
http://www.nytimes.Com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r=0
Anyone using an offensive term like “libturds” is not worthy of further attention. STFU, GTFO, ESAD.
Says the guy using equally offensive terms. I love how you cut and run when faced with uncomfortable truths that you’d rather ignore. Pathetic, but not unexpected on this little hack site.
You consider “selfservative” and “tea-toddler” to be as offensive as “libturd” and the much more popular “libtard?” Seriously? You got problems, dude. And, by the way, this guy is a woman; most people pick up on that pretty easily from my screen name.
Yes I do. Add these to the ever-popular “tea tard,” “ammosexual,” tea-bagger,” etc, etc, and all the rest that I see on this little hack site all the time, and you’re going to get your little tighty whities in a bunch over a single word? Grow a pair dude.
I use ammosexual because it accurate describes those who are obsessed with their guns and believe the 2nd is the only constitutional amendment. I use talibangelical to describe people like my niece who do indeed want to impose a theocracy on this secular nation, but I have never used any other pejoratives you mentioned (go ahead and check…I dare you to find one). Surely you don’t hold me personally responsible for what others say on this or any other site, do you? By the way, I just told you that I’m a woman; I wear granny panties, not tighty whities, but undoubtedly already have a bigger pair than you. Now, finally…this conversation is over and, once again, STFU, GTFO, ESAD. Thank you for your cooperation.
Translation: “My name-calling is ok, but yours isn’t”
Hmmm, for someone who self-identifies as a “woman,” you need to learn that’s what’s good for the goose is also good for the gander.
Your failure to say anything at all against all the BS, drivel, bile, libel, and slander being pushed on this website DOES constitute tacit acceptance, and therefore YES, I do hold people like you responsible.
Blah, blah, blah. What part of “this conversation is over” do you not understand? Don’t bother answering because it’s phucking over!
Oh, is this conversation over? Is it over because I’m using too many big words for your old brain to process? Is it because yet again I’ve exposed your blatant hypocrisy, lies and name-calling? You poor thing. Don’t sweat it, this is the way that most I my interactions with you low-info libturds end, with you ignoring my arguments instead of answering, cussing me out arms running away. Pathetic.
Sure, just as there are a few liberals out there on the extreme far left that are just as bad, i.e. the trolls that infest this site like roaches. The fact that ANYONE who disagrees with you for any reason is immediately labeled with the above terms, this is the problem. Your stereotyping is imminently unhelpful, cognitively lazy, and ultimately the reason that liberals have been described by leftist Don Lemon as “far more intolerant” than conservatives. The truth may hurt, but there it is.
“just as there are a few liberals out there on the extreme far left that are just as bad”
Couldn’t agree more. This is a problem with extremism; not liberalism or conservatism.
“Your stereotyping is imminently unhelpful, cognitively lazy…”
My stereotyping? I hope that was a general complaint and not one targeted at me. I haven’t said or done anything to give you that impression.
Yes, general complaint. However, you have to realize that you are the minority among liberals on sites like this, the vast majority of whom are perfectly comfortable stereotyping and spreading hatred and bigotry against conservatives all day long.
I would just add that for every liberal site with bias, there is another conservative site doing the same thing. And those people are perfectly comfortable stereotyping and spreading hatred and bigotry against liberals all day long.
Again, an extremist problem, not specific to liberals.
Agreed. This site however is part of the problem. The stories they publish are full of hatred and bile, and cater to the extreme left
You keep missing the point, that when the “given” reasons for right wing hate, all fail the honesty test, you are left with only the “other” reasons, which include racism, partisan politics and distorted views and opinions that rile the base.
Wow, if only you could hear yourself talk. Who says my views are any less “honest,” my opinions any more “distorted” than yours?? You leftists are just as partisan, just as “distorted” in the view of the right. You really can’t see the forest for the trees, can you? Wow
It’s not “Who” that says it, it’s “reality” that says it. FACTS are not partisan, and when you base your position without any factual support, you are basing your position on something OTHER than the facts. To then rely on distortion, false facts and lies, makes your position less than honest, and incorrect. That is one reason Obama was elected, because the right, ran against their made up nonsensical claims they made about him, and the actual facts debunked their entire campaign.
And if you are keeping score, the nation has not been destroyed, gun owners still own their guns, we can all still select a religion of our choice, and the world respects us more now than during the previous admins terms.
Now think back to how the Democrats won the White House, they ran against the actual opponents, and not trying to “create” a straw man candidate they could beat, and won. Mitt said 47% of voters didn’t matter. McCain, well, he gave us Palin. Reality, trumps distortions and straw man arguments.
yawn … You don’t seem to realize that your side lies, distorts, and does these EXACT same things all the time. This site is publishing lies and distortions right now. You’re so incredibly arrogant it’s almost hard to fathom.
Have you seen John Stewart’s coverage of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid? He clearly shows how corrupt and dishonest BOTH are. How about Colbert’s recent dissing of Clinton as being completely un-genuine? It was epic.
Here is the ACTUAL definition of “liberal” from Webster:
Right. Your comment is just the epitome of usefulness and maturity.
What legislation have the Republicans passed in the past 20 years that has benefited you?
Hmmmm …
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act (2001) - benefited me by giving me a tax break and putting money back in my pocket
Unborn Victims of Violence Act (2004) - benefits me by recognizing a child in utero as a legal victim if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. (Remember, this is not the same as abortion, we’re talking about ALL children in utero).
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (2005) - Protects firearm manufacturers from frivolous lawsuits, helping to keep gun prices low.
There are many others, shall I go on?
You’re really stretching with 2 and 3, those don’t directly benefit you whatsoever, and as a matter of fact, the 3rd one directly benefits gun manufacturers, much like other laws that get passed to favor corporations over people.
Sure they do, all of them. The fact that legislation like this moves the country in the way I want to go DOES benefit me, as “benefit” is in the eye of the beholder. The third one in particular is an enormous benefit to me and all gun owners who now do not have to pay extra for their guns. Protecting gun manufacturing DOES benefit and protect gun owners. They’re not mutually exclusive.
Nah, you had to go through some severe contortions to make that somehow benefit you.
Republicans don’t give a damn about you, they just get get people like you who are stupid enough to vote for them so they can cut veterans benefits and social security for the elderly while giving your corporate overlords massive tax breaks.
You keep voting Republican and keep expecting to become one of the 1%, and it’s not going to happen.
The Republican party is anti-people
It’s a “severe contortion” to claim that the price of guns going up would not affect me, a gun consumer, directly? Yea, sorry pal.
You really should get a grip, and stop your ignorant, stereotypical whining.
Troll
Apparently you don’t know the definition of the word “troll,” now do you?
A “troll” is not someone who simply disagrees with you, especially when they can provide a cogent argument to back up their assertions. You and your tired, debunked “the Republican party only serves their oligarch masters” BS fit the definition much better. You find yourself unable to adequately answer to my question, so you resort to name-calling and hope I’ll go away. Typical behavior on this ridiculous little hack site, which is why I have just about zero respect for you libturds left. At least over on MM they can be reasonable once in a while. Here? I have yet to meet anyone reasonable.
Desjay, you are having your butt handed to you! LOL
Which Gun debate are you refering to? The one that says there are To Many Guns in America? Or Gun owners should have background checks? Or All Guns should be registered in the State where the purchaser lives? Is that really a loosing debate? You are Hilarious. Paranoid and Ignorant but still Hilarious.
You are losing the debate that says there are “To Many Guns in America” — right now there are over 300,000,000 guns in this country, almost one for every man, woman, and child.
You are losing the debate that “Gun owners” should have background checks” because the vast majority of gun sales are ALREADY subject to background checks, and congress failed to pass a “universal” background check law right after Sand Hook.
You are losing the debate over gun registration - only 3 of the 50 states require residents to register their guns with the government, and these types of laws are being repealed left and right. Almost the entire country right now is moving towards the strengthening of gun rights, not gun control.
“To many”?? “a loosing debate”?? Wow, who taught you how to spell? I’m not the “paranoid” or “ignorant” one here pal.
Nice try. Known as the “gun show loophole,” most states do not require background checks for firearms purchased at gun shows from private individuals — federal law only requires licensed dealers to conduct checks. Nothing regarding registering Gun in State where purchaser lives. Pal!!!
Paranoid and Ignorant describes you. But then again you already knew that!!!!
Huh?? The so-called “gun show loophole” is precisely the type of argument you know-nothings are losing. There is NO SUCH THING as the “gun show loophole,” as these private transactions can happen anywhere, including gun shows, and unregulated individual sale of privately-held goods is still the law of the land in this country. Your ilk have been largely unable to convince the public of this idea.
The fact that only a few very blue states require background checks between private individuals shows how badly your kind are losing this debate.
The fact that almost no states require gun registries is further proof of how badly your kind are losing this debate. Shall I go on?
*points and laughs*
Kinda like I do every time I come to troll the forums on this ridiculous little hack MM-wannabe site.
He pretty much mirror ISIS.
Apparently libturds do not believe in free speech and free enterprise… What else is new?
Wrong, this is EXACTLY free enterprise in motion.
He has his right to free speech just as others have the free speech right to point out he is spreading hate speech. Admonishing others for using the same free speech was not very well thought out on your part.
Really impressed with your immature use of buzznames. You get the rude and ignorant prize for the dayl
No trophy for him; he only comes in 4th!
Says the guy on the little hack site spewing “rude and ignorant” bs against conservatives all day every day. I’d call your use of terms like “bigot,” “racist,” “ammosexual,” “tea tard,” “tea bagger,” etc, etc, a far worse “immature use of buzznames.” Pot, meet Kettle.
you pig-boy, what government agency shut his stupid up? again, you prove you are to stupid to know everyone else ALSO have 1st Amendment rights as well.
Indeed… Racism is alive!
so you are saying you are too stupid to keep up with current events and feel the need to lie to please your imaginary “GAWD”.
So when did Obama speak up in support of our police? When did he, even for a moment, appear to have their backs? Appearance is important after all. Go ahead, we’ll wait.
I don’t have the date and time, but it was right after an ambush of police. He said directly that it was “totally UNACCEPTABLE” and more.
As for “having the backs” of police in situations that were dubious and very much in question as to the actions of police, that is NOT his job, but the judiciary.
Well, that’s quite the relief that the POTUS would have the guts to at least claim that murder of police is unacceptable #sarc.
However, this is not him speaking up in support of the police at all. This is, at bare minimum, him speaking up against murder in general, which thank goodness he had the guts to at least say something.
The Obama admin clearly does not give the police the benefit of the doubt, as they should as the highest government authority in the land (the police are also a government agency). The POTUS has acted like a POS on police issues.
Are you saying you trust the government?
right here liar;
In a statement, Obama asked for support of police families.
“I
also promised that I would continue to highlight the uncommon bravery
that police officers show in our communities every single day. They put
their lives on the line for our safety,” Obama said in the statement. “Targeting police officers is completely unacceptable — an affront to civilized society.”
You libturds have come to OWN the Black Lies Matter movement, and Obama is really not helping things at all. Sure, maybe he says a few false, token words here and there, but when he sends three of his staffers to the funeral of a despicable th ug killed by police, while waiting until the police actually start dying, targeted by other th ugs inspired by this “movement,” to say anything at all (and when he does, it comes across as the bare minimum), it comes as far little, far too late. Thank GAWD we only have one more year of this clown.
Translation: racist spews racist BS from it’s troll clubhouse talking points of racist BS. in hopes of getting a chubbie from other racist trolls and a nickel a reply
Wow, you’ve just summed up the entire purpose of ifyouonlynews in a single sentence. Nice work!
denial, projection and racist moronities sure does define you
So, by OMITTING the speech he DID make regarding violence aimed AT police, you think none of us SAW it?
I DID, he DID make one, and has mentioned it on numerous other occasions.
Nice try though troll.
Hmm, one of these things is not like the other, one of these things doesn’t belong….oh yeah, that’s it! When someone kills a cop on video, the murderer doesn’t walk away without even being charged.
You’re proof of that!
Not going to watch the video and up the views. Wonder how his promotion is going? lol
If the market doesn’t agree with the message, it will let know… The market! Not a bunch of self righteous libturds!
Sorry, nothing that tiny goes anywhere near my mouth.
as much as you obsess over my penis you really need to re-think the political creeps you bend over for
Sorry, I require a minimum of 2 inches in length before I start to obsess. I’m not the one bringing up genetalia, that’s you pal.