The Lie About Obamacare That Just Won’t Die Sees New Life - Righties Outraged…Again (IMAGES)

The Affordable Care Act has proven to be wildly successful in providing care to Americans who would otherwise be using the emergency room as their primary care physician. Even the conservative Forbes had to admit that premium rate increases were the lowest they’d ever seen.

In short, Obamacare has turned out to be anything but the death-panel laden, tax burdening economy-killer the right-wing wanted it to be so very badly.

How do you counter such incredibly good news that doesn’t jive with your political point of view?

You resurrect one of the oldest and dumbest lies about the law ever posted on social media:

Notice the name of the page that originally created the meme is “Retire Obama In 2012.” How’d that work out for ya?

It’s important when you make stuff up that you include specific references like “page 114, line 22.” The text on that line makes no sense without lines 21 and 23. Together they read:

(c) PROTECTION OF DATA.—The Secretary shall en sure (through the promulgation of regulations or otherwise) that all data collected pursuant to subsection (a) are—

Yes, even at that it leaves you wondering what the heck it’s talking about. One thing is for certain, it ISN’T some exemption from the law for Congress, the President, or anyone else.

So how did this whole thing get started? That’s actually a great story.

In an attempt to embarrass Democrats, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) proposed an amendment forcing all members of Congress and all of their staffs to enter the exchanges:

The only health plans that the Federal Government may make available to Members of Congress and congressional staff with respect to their service as a Member of Congress or congressional staff shall be health plans that are — (I) created under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act); or (II) offered through an Exchange established under this Act (or an amendment made by this Act).

Democrats, hardly embarrassed by the amendment, went ahead and added the amendment to the law. Unfortunately for Republicans trying to discredit anything they could about Obamacare, the law specifically states that people who are offered insurance through their employers had the right to keep that insurance. The people listed in the amendment all had qualified plans through their employer, the federal government.

The amendment was removed, and in typical Republican fashion the ordeal was put into the spin machine: If congress was mandated to use the exchanges, and now they’re not, why that means an exemption for them was created.

Voila, the birth of a really dumb scandal.

In all actuality the opposite was true. In an attempt to discredit Democrats, Republicans tried to have Congress and their staffers play by a different set of rules, which in essence violates the 14th amendment. Rather than admit they’re idiots it was much easier to let the spin continue without comment or correction.

Unfortunately it failed miserably, as proven by the current occupant of the Oval Office.

Every so often the right-wing nutjobs who need to keep people angry in order to get likes and shares on their hate pages resurrect something incredibly stupid, or just start shouting “Benghazi!”

You may have heard the saying “the definition of insanity is trying the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.” That may need to change to “people who frequent ridiculous conservative Facebook pages.”


 

Featured Image: fellowshipoftheminds.com

Send to Kindle
  • Jinmichigan

    If not for FAKE SCANDALS, repubs would never be heard from again.

    • Elton Hartzler

      What was FAKE about Lois Learner?

      • rt5guide

        Lois Learner, she exists. The purported “scandal”, attributed to her, DOING HER JOB, more right wing bullshit.

      • Jinmichigan

        Elton, Please let us all know what crime has Lois Learner been charged with? Otherwise all we have is more Kabuki Theatre by repubs.

        • Elton Hartzler

          …. Crime??? My bad. I thought you said “scandals.” How ’bout Bush and Cheney? Were they convicted of any crimes?
          .

          • Johnny 5

            You have yet to point out what the alleged scandal was. You see, we all know the scandal you are referring to and it was thoroughly debunked… hence the rightwingers clinging to debunked myths. So dish, what’s this new scandal that only you know about?

          • Jinmichigan

            The right wing whining does not make a scandal, Elton. And your deflection on Bush and Cheney doesn’t either. If repubs had anything to run on, they would. Obviously they think scandals are their only chance.

      • Icewaterchrist

        Ya gotta the love the “”argumentum ad caps lock”. Guaranteed to win any debate.

        • Elton Hartzler

          … You feeling OK, today? I cut and pasted it.
          .

          • Johnny 5

            “I cut and pasted it”…. So you admit you have no original thought?

          • Elton Hartzler

            …. @Johnny 5 - “So you admit you have no original thought?” — Duh, I almost don’t know where to begin. Actually, I could write a book. My “original” thought was obvious. It was “you.” You are the news reporter who becomes the news. You were totally oblivious to the fact that your fellow traveling companion, fellow lib Jinmichigan, commented in upper case and when I sarcastically pasted his comment in upper case it didn’t even register with your liberal, closed mind. And there’s a very good reason for that. You are emblematic. You encapsulate everything dysfunctional about the modern day liberal. Bury your head in the sand and alienate yourself from the real planet Earth. Simply believe what you want to believe. That way you can continue to feel good about yourself, which is what’s really important in your life. If you really believe the IRS issue has been “thoroughly debunked” then I feel sorry for your children. They must be growing up in a cave, or worse, some kind of a liberal cult.
            .

  • charlotte

    I think that a letter by 47 senators meant to undermine the US government more important than what email server Secretary Clinton used. But what are we hearing about????

  • Robert Ruedisueli

    You might be interested to know that laws aren’t even traditionally referenced “Page (n), line (n)”

    They are referenced in traditional outline nubering.

    • http://www.photo-fix.com/ Kelly Basden

      …………………………..