Republicans Just Voted To Allow Terror Suspects To Purchase Guns — Again

On Tuesday two individuals who had become radicalized committed a mass shooting in San Bernardino that killed fourteen and wounded twenty-one others. It is now known that these individuals had been in contact with suspected terrorists under surveillance from the FBI.

On Wednesday, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced an amendment that required terror suspects on government watchlists to undergo a background check before purchasing a gun.

According to Feinstein’s office, the Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act would:

  • Allow the attorney general to deny the purchase or transfer of a firearm or explosive to a known or suspected terrorist if the prospective recipient may use the firearm or explosive in connection with terrorism.
  • Maintain protections in current law that allow a person who believes he has been mistakenly prevented from buying a firearm to learn of the reason for the denial, and then to challenge the denial, first administratively with the Department of Justice, and then through a lawsuit against the Justice Department.

Section Two of the bill explicitly states the federal government is:

Granting the Attorney General the authority to deny the sale, delivery, or transfer of a firearm or the issuance of a firearms or explosives license or permit to dangerous terrorists

So not only would this bill work to prevent guns going into the wrong hands, it would allow those seeking a gun to appeal to the government to get a gun if they feel they have been wrongly denied one. Everyone in Congress should support something so simple, so clean-cut.

But of course the amendment was voted down in a 45-54 vote, completely along party lines. Democrats for, Republicans against. So once again, the Republicans decided to bow down to the will of the NRA and put American lives in danger. As it’s been reported through the Government Accountability Office that over 2,000 terror suspects in the United States have legally purchased guns between 2004 (when the assault weapons ban ended) and 2014.

Even in the wake of the deadliest shooting in the United States since Sandy Hook being committed by radicalized terrorist sympathizers, the Senate couldn’t muster up the courage to pass even this common sense legislation.

Senator Feinstein rightfully blasted the Republican-controlled Senate for failing to pass the commonsense piece of legislation:

If you need proof that Congress is a hostage to the gun lobby, look no further than today’s vote blocking a bill to prevent known or suspected terrorists from buying guns and explosives…If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous to buy a gun. Unfortunately that commonsense idea failed to attract enough votes to pass the Senate. Police chiefs and law enforcement groups have unequivocally stated that closing this loophole is critical to strengthening our national security. And common sense tells us we’re less safe until we do so.

This bill which is supported by former President George W. Bush has been since 2007, shows just how out of touch Washington is and how powerful lobbying interest like that of the NRA is.

The House Version of the bill was introduced by Republican Representative Peter King (who had ties to terrorism himself) and had 42 co-sponsors, all Democrats. It has yet to reach committee.

Republicans last month voted to require background checks for Syrian refugees. Now they vote down background checks for suspected terrorists?

The madness has to stop. The stranglehold in D.C. has to stop. People are dying and terrorism is getting the upper hand.

Featured image via Wikipedia

  • Jackie Garnett

    This is one of the most dangerous and disgusting things the republicans have done. They have no conscience and certainly do not care for the people they represent.

    • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

      yawn … the key word here is SUSPECT. Seriously, do you libturds not understand the idea of due process? Just because someone is suspected of a crime doesn’t mean we take away their constitutional rights until AFTER they are convicted of said crime.

      • TheNameGame

        who are you talking to? You may think you’re talking to a whole category of people called liberals, but you’re not. Republicans were all for this bill before. Did you disagree with it when they did? I hope so for the sake of consistency. Also, you do realize that constitutional rights are absolutely taken away everyday despite due process. Even through due process, we have our justice system following the $$$ and jailing people with disproportionate standards or wrongfully convicting people all the time. I’m not with/against this bill, as I need more information on it than this brief excerpt

        I really think people’s perspectives of the world is being molded by social media, TV, and mainstream news sources that are interested in ratings, not real journalism.

        • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

          Also, you do realize that constitutional rights are absolutely taken away everyday despite due process.

          I do, which is yet another reason I’m a lifetime NRA member. Were it not for their efforts, my right to bear arms would be severely diminished by now. Now what we need are groups to aggressively defend our OTHER rights that are being taken away. Unfortunately, most other issues don’t get people nearly as riled up as does the prospect of having our guns taken away.

          • Jackie Garnett

            You still didn’t answer TheNameGame’s question. Were you for this bill when it was introduced and passed by the Republicans?

          • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

            Republicans were all for this bill before

            Far too vague a statement for me to respond. I for one don’t recall a bill like this being supported by Republicans. If he’s not lying about this, then I probably don’t know about it because I’m fairly young, However, the answer in either case would be NO, his silly attempt to paint me as a partisan hack completely aside.

          • Russell

            I cannot find a bill like this that was ever supported by the republicans in the congressional record.

          • Russell

            If the NRA still fought for the type of responsible gun ownership it used to, then gun ownership would not be such an issue. People WOULD have to get checked out, gun shows would not have exemptions and training would be required. The FACT is that the NRA no longer gives a damn what 85% of it’s members say. If they did they would be fighting with that 85% who are OK with gun registration reform. But the NRA only has ONE task these days, and that is to sell more guns, because the gun mfgs pay them more than you do.

          • Russell

            It is the dramatic rise of IRRESPONSIBLE GUN OWNERS that is causing you the headache you have now. That and the fact that you really dont care about the innocent dead.

          • religion&politics

            Oh, we do care, we just refuse to accept blame for these deaths, especially since (1) CA already has the type of gun restrictions being pushed by Obama and the left, and (2) there is no evidence at all that these restrictions will stop people like this in the future, since they both passed background checks and used weapons already against the law in that state.

          • alexander

            You are mistaken in the fact that the firearms used were all CA illegal. The handguns were bought legal……but the semi-auto rifles were bought thru what they call a “straw purchase”. Bur all these weapons were legal by CA State law. The magazines used were bought out of State. All 30 round clips, taped together for 60 rounds total. As a matter of fact, they know what store they came from…..and even know the original buyer of the long guns.

          • religion&politics

            The pictures of the seized Ar15s provided by the police show them to be of the non-CA legal variant. Long guns with detachable magazines are not legal in CA, nor are standard-capacity magazines.

            However, the fact that they are able to track these weapons to the dealers and to id the straw purchasers shows (1) that the current laws are working as intended, and (2) that this type of law does not stop people like this. Increasing the penalties on straw purchasers, perhaps to the level of accessory to whatever crime is committed with the gun, would almost certainly help. Disarming the rest of us will NOT help.

          • jtmkinsd

            Wrong…it’s the hype driven by media and the rabid anti-gun lobby.

          • Lou9999

            Here we go…..irresponsible gun owners. Hahahahaha. 600K people went hunting in Wisconsin last year. Guess what…no shootings. I am not a member of the NRA, but you are blaming an organization that not one member has been accused of these mass murders.

          • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

            I understand your frustration, but that’s just plain immature.

            Do you care enough about the innocent dead to get trained and carry concealed?

          • religion&politics

            If that were true, why does a solid majority of Americans still hold them in a favorable light?

          • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

            Wow. No, registration is a confiscation risk, which is a threat to the right of the people, and that’s why it’s always been a no-no.

            Christ.

      • JustTheFactsMa’am

        ‘libturd’, how original. Hear that in your mommies basement? But the point remains, if someone is a SUSPECT and they’re not allowed on planes, and you’re ok with that, then I EXPECT that person should also be prevented from purchasing weapons.

        • http://religionandpolitics.org/ religion&politics

          When the right to air travel become enshrined in the highest law of the land, then you can get back to me. Our laws state quite unequivocally that our rights are not to be taken from us without due process. Your simplistic little diatribe doesn’t take the actual law of the land into account.

          • Russell

            So, then, you are saying that because it is a right (though you have the meaning of the constitution wrong, but OK) to own a gun, terrorists in the US also have that right, and when people die, we just have to accept that. YOU ARE ONE SICK HUMAN BEING. (Term used loosely) Are you going to be OK when it is your Mom, wife, kid, brother???? What family are you OK with being killed so you can own an assault rifle??? Do they know that?

          • religion&politics

            No, my interpretation of the constitution is the same upheld by the SCOTUS 3 times since 1875. The 2A is in INDIVIDUAL right, no matter how much people like you wish it weren’t.

            Foreign nationals? NO, they are not citizens so they should not have the right. However, US citizens are protected by our constitution.

            Mere suspicion is not enough to take away someone’s rights. However, as long as you’d be willing to curtail these people’s OTHER rights (1A rights, 4A rights, 14A, etc), then maybe I’d be up to agreeing with you. However, it seems that you hate guns so much that you’re willing to trample all over this one particular right.

            What does owning an “assault rifle” (wrong term btw) have to do with keeping suspected terrorists from purchasing weapons anyway?

          • Lou9999

            Still blaming the weapon and not the individual. SMH.

          • http://www.sparky3489.webs.com Scott C

            What is the individual without the weapon?

          • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

            You need to get reliably informed on gun matters. You are ignorant and bigoted.

        • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

          And you are quite wrong in your expectations and that is quite easy to explain to you if you haven’t gotten informed by now on your own.

      • thecolonel1

        Anyone who uses a word like “libturds” is obviously thinking on a level no higher than a 12 year old, and cannot possibly be taken seriously.

        • religion&politics

          Yet you can’t bring yourself to actually respond to this “12-year-old”‘s argument directly, huh? Interesting.

          I hope you apply the same argument to your buddies at this site who constantly refer those who disagree with them by a host of interesting, nasty names. Somehow I doubt it.

          • thecolonel1

            You have either taken too many drugs, or not enough.

        • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

          Actually, it’s justified at least in this instance. It’s very stupid people who are concerned about the no fly list, confused vs. the no buy list for guns we already have.

      • Russell

        DUE PROCESS is served when the person on the list fights it, and gets off the list. EVERY TERRORIST IS JUST A SUSPECT, UNTIL THEY ARE NOT.

        • religion&politics

          Sooooooo, “innocent until proven guilty” doesn’t apply to suspected terrorists?

          So, it sounds like you agree with Trump that we should put all Muslim immigrants into a registry so we can track them. Is that right? I suppose you also support shutting down mosques where suspected terrorists attend church, eh?

          Dude, you’re sounding more like a conservative than a liberal at this point. Is that really what you want?? Or do you hate guns so much that you don’t care about the restriction of this one particular right?

        • jtmkinsd

          You just don’t get it do you. An allegation in this country is not grounds to suspend one’s rights (even though it happens).

    • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

      Actually, it was the correct decision. We already have a no-buy list for guns, the NICS.

  • jtmkinsd

    I suppose it doesn’t matter to anyone that Ted Kennedy was on a “watch list”…5 times? Grow up people.

    • Russell

      NO. It does not. Each time he took the effort to get himself off of it, he did not cry baby that it is someone else who should do that for him. YOU grow up, and tell people to solve their own problem. The person on that list who IS a terrorist, might just kill someone you love.

      • jtmkinsd

        So let me get this straight…you believe it’s okay to strip someone of their constitutionally guaranteed rights when they are, through no fault of their own and with no notice or due process, included on some “list”? There were a few times in history when this kind of behavior was acceptable…I’ll leave it to you to figure out when that was.

      • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

        You’re confused about the NICS vs. watch list.

  • Pamela McAllaster Orr

    Belgium, France and California have strict gun laws. You can’t just walk into a gun store in California and buy a gun. Attacking the 2nd amendment isn’t the answer. Radical Muslims are not too concerned about breaking the law. The killer wife was background checked before she got her visa, how well did that work out?

    • Lou9999

      Sounds like a background check problem. But at least the 10,000 Syrians will be well checked out…..choke.

  • Russell

    No one is ATTACKING THE 2ND AMENDMENT. Have you been paranoid all your life? Listen, lets say you somehow WRONGLY

  • alexander

    What stops a “Good Guy” with a gun from turning into a “Bag Guy” with a gun ????

    • Lou9999

      Morality.

  • Melvin Smith

    Could we get away from all these efforts at attacking the second Amendment and Simply apply what is done in regard to the 15th Amendment to the Second? Special Photo Identification required…. local registration required…. Restrict hours of sales… Restrict the number of places to purchase…. If it’s good for the 15th, isn’t it good for the 2nd? Placing restriction, registration, special hours, and special Identification doesn’t mean people can’t vote or own guns no does it?
    Article XV.

    Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude—

  • http://peopleofarms.com/ Odysseus M Tanner

    Articles like these seek supporters who don’t mind being duped.

  • Billy “The WiZaRd” Angus

    The GOP ought to be executed for their act of high treason!!!

  • Billy “The WiZaRd” Angus

    Curses on the NRA!!
    Curses on the GOP!!!
    They’re all nothing but P.O.S.!!!
    Curses!! Curses!! A THOUSAND CURSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!