Republican Candidate Ben Carson Believes The US Constitution Was Only Written By And For Christians

During his first news conference after Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson blew up social media with his controversial remarks about Muslims, he defended those aforementioned comments, complaining about the ‘politically correct culture.’

Carson stands by his comments that a Muslim should never be in charge of the United States, and that Islam, as a religion, is inconsistent with the United States Constitution.

Ok, folks … time for a lesson in civics. The United States Constitution, as written, is a completely secular document (for those lunging for the dictionary, that means non-religious). While the founding fathers were believers and practiced their religion, they were also strong believers in the separation of church and state. That is why you only see two — yes TWO — references to religion in the entire document. The First Amendment contains the words “respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” and Article VI prohibits ‘religious tests’ for public office. That’s it, folks. There is no mention of a ‘national’ religion, Christianity or other religion. PERIOD.

So it’s kind of bothersome when a candidate running for the highest political office in the land excludes the representation of a number of registered voters (albeit a minority, but voters all the same). And when given the opportunity to get a Mulligan, Carson said,

“Sharia law is completely antithetical to Americanism. We need to fix America, and we need to get people to actually start listening and being capable of understanding our Constitution.”

Wha-wha-what??? Carson has taken the practice of sharia law in Muslim countries and superimposed it on the United States, as if there is a movement afoot to replace the Constitution. The hate rhetoric is strong, and only seeks to foster continued anti-Muslim sentiment in this country. Maybe Carson should read a little and start understanding the Constitution himself before attempting to incite the masses.

Featured image courtesy of theatlantic.com.

  • GoodEssence

    Listen better. Carson said that he would not “advocate” the election of anyone, Muslim, Christian, or other, who did not place the Constitution at the apex. He wants no theocracy of any stripe. Carson did not say that the Constitution precludes a Muslim president. He said that Sharia is incompatible with the Constitution, and that he could support a Muslim who stated that Sharia should not be applied in the United States if the person acted accordingly.

    • Christopher Morris

      Ben Carson as a Dominionist Christian Fundamentalist disqualifies him by his own standard

    • The_Random_Sample

      Carson supports a tax system based on a church tithe. He’s almost as theocratic as they get - although, admittedly, Huckabee, Cruz and Santorum are all worse.

  • Ricardo Rebelo

    It WAS written by Christians… Was it not?

    And besides, you’re an idiot Katherine Bernadette… Stop the spinning and stop the word twist!

    • Gehennah

      Many of the writers were Christian, not all of them.

      But it was not written only for Christians.

    • The_Random_Sample

      No, actually, it was not. Most of the founding fathers were Deists, not Christians. Although Washington attended Episcopal church services, he typically left before communion. This is one of the reasons they advocated separation of church and state - particularly Madison (the author of the Bill of Rights) and Jefferson.

  • jim6661

    No Ricardo, it was not. Most of whom we would call the “major” Founding Fathers leaned toward Deism. Thats the belief in a “clockmaker” type god that Christians would not recognize. I think if Darwin had come along 100 years earlier they would have been Atheists. Of course that is speculation.

  • Howard Bonds

    Sorry, but Ben Carson is right. It was written for Christians. Religious liberty was not achieved in this country until 1978…up until then their was no such thing as religious freedom in this country. Although they said some cute words about freedom. they were a bunch of homicidal religious fanatics.
    The American Indian Religious Freedom Act

    • Christopher Morris

      Really perhaps you should read the Treaty of Tripoli that shows you are ignorant of history and civics.

      • Howard Bonds

        Hello the religious freedom act was signed in 1978….Maybe you should learn about reality instead of storytime fabrications from an 8th grade history book. its cute and it sounds good, but its a lie.

        • Christopher Morris

          The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1796 by the people who wrote the constitution and founded this Nation thus you need to repeat the 3rd grade for reading comprehension and basic history. It also proves you are wrong and ignorant. The Relevant portion Article 11, states:
          As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

          • Howard Bonds

            Here we go again. You are fast to learn nonsense but slow to grasp reality. If that is the case, than please explain how the government funded the harassment and terror of native peoples into the Christian religion with government-funded boarding schools ect…get a grip on yourself. The government and its people have no problems inflicting Christianity on who ever it pleases. You cannot even testify in a courtroom without putting your hands on a bible. 1978 is the year the religious freedom act was signed not 1796.

          • Howard Bonds

            I await your witty retort.

          • Christopher Morris

            I can not have a battle of wits with you as you are woefully unarmed.

          • Christopher Morris

            There is no requirement to use a bible to swear in it is completely optional if you wish you can swear in on the Dictionary or even as was originally done on your testicles though in your case I suspect you will have an issue finding them first. . The oath requires no books. The Constitution itself the founding document mentions Christianity never and it in fact has only two references to Religion one that forbade it from being used as a religious test which you and Dr Carson should read up on and the Establishment clause which enshrines separation and State. Then there is the numerous writings of those who wrote the document one of which I have referenced and quoted here. The lack of basic intellect and civic and historical understanding is the issue. Now please go back to your hole and leave the intellectual discussions to those who have intelligence.

          • The_Random_Sample

            You are mistaken about not being able to testify in court without putting your hand on a Bible. All the states, as well as the federal courts, allow witnesses to swear OR AFFIRM they will tell the truth, under penalty of law.

          • Gehennah

            I’ve been sworn in in court twice as a witness, neither time did I have to use a Bible.

  • Ricardo Rebelo

    Well…

    • Howard Bonds

      ya that’s the moment you realize white people will love anyone of color as long as they say the same bigoted racist nonsense all conservatives love to hear. Never mind that white people are liberals too…but who knew whites were racist against each other? You do you bigoted twit.

      • Ricardo Rebelo

        Aren’t you the common libturd?

    • Christopher Morris

      Carson has support among a small group of crazy people not the American People and certainly not African American Community.

      • Ricardo Rebelo

        I guess you are right… The African American Community pretty much supports killing it’s members and nothing more…

  • hans evansonsupplymarijuana

    See Available strains Good medical marijuana 4 4 3) 7 3 2-5 7 7 0
    for Pain, cancer, insomnia We got some MEDICAL marijuana/weeds real
    Mary Jane good for and we do also provide medical cards to all our
    clients willing to buy meds for their sick and doesn’t have a card JNHJJJHJHJHH

  • The_Random_Sample

    Roy Moore, Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, and writer Bryan Fischer both take the position that the First Amendment protects only Christianity. Fortunately, there are many SCOTUS decisions to the contrary.