Obama’s Planned Executive Order To Raise Wages Outfoxes Republicans AGAIN

The GOP is literally handing Obama all the credit for righting the wrongs in this country — and we’re okay with that!

President Obama is taking matters into his own hands again on an issue that has negatively affected millions of families across the nation with a plan to order the raise of wages that have been stagnant since the recession.

Bloomberg reported:

President Barack Obama is preparing to do what the U.S. economic recovery has been slow to accomplish: raise the wages of millions of Americans.

His administration is drafting new rules on who qualifies for overtime compensation, forcing more businesses to pay time-and-a-half after 40 hours of work. Many employees now earning as little as $23,660 a year — below the federal poverty line for a family of four — aren’t entitled to overtime pay because they are considered managers.

Currently, wages have been slow to rise and are still on average $1500 lower than the average wage in December 2007, before the massive recession began, with the median household income at $54,500 in February this year and the last six months have been the most sluggish of all, even as unemployment continues to drop off and the stock market continues to skyrocket.

The plan being hatched by the Obama administration would essentially ensure salaried workers are being compensated fairly for their overtime. Often managers are hired on at a set rate but work more than 40 hours a week, meaning business owners are getting away with not paying the federally mandated time and a half wage for time that exceeds 40 hour weeks. Business owners have found a way to, once again, get richer off the backs of their employees.

While Congress chases their tails on the issue of raising the federal minimum wage, President Obama can still order the raise for salaried workers which helps millions of people who are often forgotten about in this wage war.

And it’s hurting millions of families because not only do their jobs take them away from their spouses and kids by having to work long hours, but they aren’t being fairly compensated for their time, and that is hurting the economy.

Sherrod Brown, a U.S. Senator from Ohio said:

This is absolutely one of the best practical ways to give people the on-ramp to the middle class. When you strip people of their overtime pay, which is what’s happened over the years, they really don’t have a chance to get ahead: They’re working harder and harder and not seeing real pay increases.

People are working harder and harder these days to keep their jobs, and business owners know their employees feel “replaceable” so they are exploiting their workers to keep wages low. Now that unemployment is at its lowest since 2005, it’s time to talk about compensation and wage increases.

More money in the pockets of the working class will undoubtedly boost the economy, but still Republicans repeat their long debunked claims that increasing wages means killing jobs.

When the Executive Order is put into action, Republicans who complain about this on Fox News will undoubtedly lose some support, because overworked/underpaid salaried workers are Republicans too. If this wage increase does help the economy like it’s projected to, then the GOP lawmakers who are obstructing the increase in minimum wage will have to atone for why they are actively hurting the economy and the American people.

If businesses try to counter Obama’s plan by cutting salaried workers, they will add more workers to the growing pool of hourly employees which will further help the struggle to get hourly wages increased in this country. Either way, business owners will have to pony up and pay their employees a more livable wage.

This order is about fairness. Once Obama adds his signature millions of workers will be fairly compensated for the hours they work at their jobs, and Republicans will look more useless and obstinate than ever.

H/T: Politicus | Photo: Wikipedia

Send to Kindle
  • danielistical

    Wages have not been slow to rise,,,,,THEY HAVE BEEN STOPPED by the republican congress

    • Shawn Johnson

      Please show me even one attempt by Dems to raise minimum wage. Didn’t think so.

      • Franklin Radcliff

        you’ve got to be joking or retarded.

        • Shawn Johnson

          Typical liberal, attack those who oppose. Like most Democrat idiots, you confuse talk as action. Maybe you can link me to a bill proposed by Dems to raise minimum wage.

          • Melinda Craig

            H.R.1010

            S. 460

          • Shawn Johnson

            Is that a link? You know that if Dems proposed to raise minimum wage and it was shot down by republicans, it would have been the headline of EVERY news source for months. You know that as well as I do.

          • Melinda Craig

            Does Disque allow links?? Are you bereft of the basic skills needed to find these for yourself? How stupid do you think WE are?? Obviously not as stupid as you are

          • Shawn Johnson

            If a bill was proposed to raise minimum wage and was shot down by republicans, it would have been front page news on EVERY news source in the country……..for months!!!

          • Melinda Craig

            14,700,000 Results on a very simple google search for ‘bill to raise minimum wage.

            So easy, even a caveman could have done it.

          • Internet Astronaut

            This is what a moron looks like^

          • Barry K Jackson

            You have to know that when a Republican asks you for an example of anything in the digital age,it’s because they only want to believe what Fox News and other Republican-based websites have posted. You can put up a reliable source here,and if a Republican didn’t say it, it can’t possibly be true. That’s why I don’t waste my time posting them. Hell,they have the internet. Let them look for themselves. I believe in checking out opposing sides,but I’m not so lazy or brainwashed that I have to depend on somebody else putting all the information out there for me.

          • brian

            not when the rpeubs own the media dumbass, like fox news, guess WHAT? when you support BIG BANKS, AND YOU SUPPORT BIG BUSINESS, and you support the RICH, wgho do you think owns the media, who do you think has the most money to spend on campaigning and propoganda….that’s right the party thatsupports the rich…the REPUBLICANS! did you see FOX NEWs talk about Ebola and Ombama all the way up to the last election, and once the election was over, EBOLA hasn’t bene mentioned since…why you ask? its called propoganda

          • Cindy Bott

            why do you keep asking and then not excepting the answer?

          • Josh Weinstein

            Because Republicans are resistant to TRUTH, FACTS, KNOWLEDGE and REALITY.

          • Shawn Johnson

            When I ask a question about minimum wage and get answers talking about veterens……..not sure why you would wonder why I didnt ACCEPT it.

          • Carib9uc

            Hey idiot, veterans are mentioned in the article and if you were one you would know that the republicans are denying us a lot.

          • Ralph A Jansen

            Um…I take it you aren’t a veteran, or you would research and see that the problem is multi-faceted. The military makes their request, and then congress (well up to now) has usually added a lot of money to this request. The talk now, with the new change in leadership is cutting back on the pay raises to Soldiers, even though their is still a discrepancy between Soldier pay and civilian pay. The military has gotten the shaft since President Bush has left office.

            In case you missed some important things, I am a veteran, and I don’t know what you are talking about.

          • Carib9uc

            Just because you are a veteran doesnt mean you are up to date on what is going on with veteran benefits. Maybe, unlike me, you arent receiving veteran benefits so that could explain it as well. I stay informed on veterans benefits and in fact there is a veterans group where I work.

          • Ralph A Jansen

            That is a problem that the military has been having. All the benefits that are lined up that no one is signing up for. (You do know the GI Bill is a benefit and that any veteran (well honorable veteran) can use that?) There are many other benefits that do not require anything special to receive. (ACAP to get out of the military is a VA benefit. So, who failed to complete their mandatory ACAP?)

          • DPepp

            See my post above, that is, if you can get your head out of your ____ long enough to look!

          • Shawn Johnson

            You have no post above.

          • timpundit

            Hey MENSA, that’s the bill’s title , look it up. You know, lkike a mature adult would. Stop digging yourself into a hole. Several people have shown you the bills the Dems put forward.

          • Melinda Craig

            14,700,000 results when I googled “bill to raise minimum wage’

            Storm Front, The Conservative Dog House, Breitbart and Fox weren’t among any of them. I guess it depends on where you get your ‘news’.

            14 MILLION, did ya get that Jr? 14 MILLION

          • Gabriel A Secas

            s for your attacks on liberals; why are you incognito?…

          • Carib9uc

            You just want someone else to do the work for you, typical Republican. Why dont you provide a link to a bill proposed by the Republicans to raise minimum wage since you know so much.

          • michael

            JUST GOOGLE THEM A$$

          • What would Studs say

            Troll

          • MarkTemporis

            Guest accounts are the first refuge of the coward.

          • RickMeister

            …when you use democrat as an adjective it’s ‘”democratic” idiots’ moron, not democrat idiots. Ain’t ya got no learnin’ ?

      • Melinda Craig

        Votesmart dot org is a non partisan site that shows all of the bills offered and how each person voted on them. Plug in the name of your favorite politician and see what’s been offered and how they voted. Consistently, every single Republican has voted NO on every piece of legislation that would have brought jobs, brought jobs back to America, prevented jobs from leaving America and on bills for to help our veterans. Even one jobs bills specifically for homeless veterans. One is for a program for suicide prevention for veterans.

        The next poor excuse will be ‘but look at the pork on those bills’, to which I say: 1st. SO WHAT? This is the way EVERYTHING has been done for years. NO excuse.

        2nd: On the bill S 1982 which would have enhanced and extended Veterans benefits was voted NO on February 27th, 2014 and the reason EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN voted no on it was because THEY weren’t allowed to add their own pork.

        There is a video on youtube of Mitch McConell promising to NEVER work with our President. To make him a ‘one term President’ And he has been true to his word. There are 367 pieces of legislation being obstructed that would help the working poor, the middle class and our veterans.

        Republicans mention the bills sitting on Reid’s desk, and claim 40 of those bills are Jobs bills. Well they’re NOT. None of those bills provide jobs for those who need them. And over 40 of the bills ‘sitting on Harry Reid’s desk are to repeal the ACA.

        WE overwhelmingly as a majority voted for President Obama TWICE to lead this country. WE want what he says he wants. Congress needs to work with him to give US what we voted for.

        If you don’t like the policies he’s tried to implement then WIN a Presidential election with the candidate of your choosing.

        • Shawn Johnson

          You might have to start looking at the dilly amendments liberals ate adding to these bills too. A lot of those are meant to fail, so they can rile the sheep.

          • Melinda Craig

            The next poor excuse will be ‘but look at the pork on those bills’, to which I say: 1st. SO WHAT? This is the way EVERYTHING has been done for years. NO excuse.

            2nd: On the bill S 1982 which would have enhanced and extended Veterans benefits was voted NO on February 27th, 2014 and the reason EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN voted no on it was because THEY weren’t allowed to add their own pork

          • Ralph A Jansen

            It is quite possible that the military itself was against this for political reasons. Veterans benefits cost a lot of money, and considering that politicians want to spend money on everything else this country does not need, the veterans have become one of the first groups to be affected. Veterans in the know would rather back a conservative who actually cares about the military and anyone else who actually cares about the military.

            Ever since Obama came into office, the military and veterans have been shafted. (so much easier to see when you are part of it.)

          • MarkTemporis

            A Conservative who really cares about the military? Find one. I challenge you to find a conservative who cares about anything other than his bank account. The worst record on veteran’s rights belongs to John McCain, who apparently believes veterans should either marry a beer heiress or die out on the street.

          • Ralph A Jansen

            You are talking to one. Umm…so this whole issue with the VA hospital that is occurring under the Democrats watch is not as bad as John McCain, who is basically a RINO? Wow…you care so much about veterans you ignore the major issues they face. All talk, zero action.

          • Gandalf

            You have been served, LOL

          • redgriffin

            Guest please start reading you post before you hit send. It might make some arguments better with words like silly not dilly.

      • Terry Vourantonis

        Way to go Guest keep upholding your uninformed opinion, even when you are wrong ! As always !

      • Carib9uc

        Better yet Guest, show one attempt by Republicans to raise minimum wage, that is the better question. Didnt think so….LOL

      • Jim Kennedy

        Stupid Republicans. Go back to watching Fox Faux News and continue to lower your I.Q.

  • Linda Parra

    Was caught in that ‘Salaried Employee’ trap for a number of years. Learned to never calculate what my hourly wage really was. It was just too depressing.

    • Shawn Johnson

      Should have moved on to another job then. Man to Dr. “My leg hurts when I do this.” Dr. to man “Stop doing that.”

      • Franklin Radcliff

        yes because there is a plethora of job openings in America right now. You really are just retarded, aren’t you. Don’t bother responding. The question is rhetorical and I already know the answer.

        • http://diashoni.tumblr.com DiaShoni

          He either has not been paying any attention whatsoever, or he’s trolling.

          • DPepp

            Trolling. No one is that stupid!

          • timpundit

            Have you met Louie Gohmert?

  • Cracking Ceilings

    So true for teachers… they are salaried, but work many “overtime” hours and are never compensated. That’s true for so many others in the work force, too.

    • Shawn Johnson

      Summers off……horrible.

      • Melinda Craig

        What’s wrong with you? ‘Summers here are less than 8 weeks long. Ever heard of Summer School?

        • Shawn Johnson

          Only 8 weeks??? OMG!! Most work summer school for more money. Don’t try to bullshit. We can all go see teachers salaries.

          • Melinda Craig

            seriously, most of us want an educated populace and know most teachers spend more time doing their jobs while not actually at school and spend money on supplies they are never compensated for.

            Typical Fright Wing Nut Job you are. It’s really sad that you think you don’t deserve better. That you have fallen hook line and sinker for the hate and division promoted by your party, against your fellow Americans.

          • Gandalf

            Example of the uneducated.

          • Victoria Gutshall

            Some years ago I was working at Wal-Mart and there were a couple of teachers who worked there part time to help make ends meet. On top of that, while I worked there I had a friend who got her teaching degree and moved to North Dakota for a teaching position. One day she and I figured out what her hourly rate would be (not even counting all the unpaid work involved in lesson planning, etc.) and she was making LESS than I made at Wal-Mart! On top of that, she is stuck with thousands of dollars in student loans to repay. Don’t get me wrong, I’m NOT defending Wal-Mart, it was a terrible place to work and no one could raise a family on what you make there, but when a TEACHER makes less than a Wal-Mart employee, something is dreadfully wrong.

      • Victoria Gutshall

        UNPAID summers off. Teachers salaries are a disgrace anyway, and then to have 3 unpaid months each year? Yes it is horrible.

  • Ricardo Rebelo

    Just the Emperor being himself…

    • Gabriel A Secas

      he has signed less bills than bush and precious presidents; and he has improved all sides of the economy despite the conservatives’ efforts to make him fail;…

      • Ricardo Rebelo

        Even if it was true, WHICH IT F%&/ ISN’T, does that give him the right to act as an emperor? Because it sounded like you think it does…

        • shulkman

          GWB, 8 years, 291 executive orders.
          President Obama, 6.17 years (so far) 205 executive orders.

          And considering that a President is empowered by the Constitution to make Executive Orders, your “emperor” comment is junk. He’s acting like the President. Good thing he is too, since Congress isn’t doing anything to help the American People.

          • Ralph A Jansen

            Yes, but his executive orders cannot spend money, because only congress has that power. (Yet some of his executive orders require money to be spent. If he has money to spend, then I believe he can. In some of his executive orders, he doesn’t have any money to back them up, yet it is still happening. Hence some new investigations finding out if money has been used illegally.) Congress would do things that helped the American People if the president didn’t attempt to make congress his lap dog. There are three branches of government for a reason. One makes the laws, one executes the laws, and the other makes sure those laws follow the constitution. When a president tries to make laws, either by executive order or by bullying congress, the whole government system falls apart. The President does not have to represent the people, that is the job of congress. When a President tries to get the congress the represent himself, one can see the problems that may develop.

        • Randy Hiner

          Whatever pisses you regressives off, it’s worth it.

        • Melinda Craig

          In what way does he act like an Emperor? Name ONE thing he’s done any differently than any Republican president that would define him as an ‘emperor’ You can’t. You fcutnuts NEVER can.

          • timpundit

            He doesn’t. This poster is just regurgitating talking points from the fox republican channel or some other equally lying site like The Blaze or World Nut Daily.

        • Gandalf

          Well since your party looks up to Putin, who is more or less a dictator/emperor, and complain that Obama should be more like him……

        • Daniel Schealler

          An emperor is a monarch that rules over an empire. An empire is a geographically extensive group of diverse states, ethnicity and cultures.

          The president is not a monarch, and America, despite wanting to and trying to become an empire, isn’t an empire.

          I think that when you said ‘emperor’, you actually meant something more along the lines of ‘dictator’. A dictator is a ruler who wields absolute authority.

          So when Obama signs an executive order to get stuff done without an express majority support from congress, you think of that as him exercising an unrightful authority over government and the American people.

          That’s also spurious, because as others have pointed out the authority of the president to issue executive orders is actually built in to how American government works. But if you’re going to cast spurious aspersions against someone, you can at least do so in a way that is accurate regarding your underlying intent.

          So don’t call Obama an ‘emperor’. Use words like ‘dictator’ or ‘tyrant’.

          • Ralph A Jansen

            The problem is the kinds of orders being given. Some of the orders given are on topics that are to be handled by congress, not the president. That is what the issue is. The president has absolutely no control on how money is spent. That belongs to congress. In that regard, the Senate has no control on how money is spent, that remains with the House of Representatives that is to represent the people. That is why any money spending bill has to find life in the House and not the Senate. (Hence the big spat a few years ago with the Senate over a budget I believe. It was completely out of order because the Senate tried to start a bill that spent money, which is unconstitutional.)

            Some of the executive orders released recently require money to be spent. Conservatives have issue with this because, constitutionally, the president cannot do this. Also, some of the elements of the executive order fall in the purview of congress, not the president.

            An important note is that this game has been played before. Democrats and liberals are trying to spin this as something new, but this has all been done before. President Jackson refused to enforce laws passed by congress in regards to Native Americans, for instance. There is so much more going on, but liberals seem to be blind to it.

    • Auntie Techy

      you should have paid attention in civics/government class, turn off the fox news and educate yourself

    • sf49ers80

      You’re not very bright if you believe this President has no right to actually run the country. Why would any person be the President if they have no ideas how to make things better?

      • Vartra Antonelli

        Because they are a modern Republican. I’ll give the Grand “Ole” Party proper respect, emphasis on the “Ole”, as in the Republican Party of old, back when they did things for the people and the Democrats were the ones working against the people. However now this same party is Hades-bent on driving the average American, anyone who is part of the 99%, into the ground and under it.

        • Ralph A Jansen

          Some people say where there is smoke there is fire. In this case there is no fire because it is the Democrats blowing smoke. There are a lot of reports on Republicans doing this and Republicans doing that, when in reality, nothing has been taking place. President Obama holds a conference on fiscal responsibility and basically holds congress captive. Do this or I will do this. Look at everything I am doing, congress is doing nothing. This is not how the political system is supposed to work. The congress is supposed to represent the people. That is what compromise is about. Yet Obama has pretty much made it clear that he has no desire to compromise. How can you expect to be represented if the President has no desire to compromise. His way or no way. We have a three branch system of government for a reason. None of the branches are supposed to ever act unilaterally, or the people suffer. If any branch holds any power it is congress, and in congress, it is the House of Representatives. They represent the people, and control the money.

          The President has stated that he will act unilaterally without representing the people (basically representing himself.) The media then fabricates a story to attack people, doing their best not to mention what is actually happening. It is called manipulation, and liberals are the masters of manipulation.

      • Ralph A Jansen

        Congress runs the country. The president enforces the actions of congress (laws). The Supreme court ensures that the actions of the other two branches fall in line with the constitution. The president DOES not have the right to run the country. It is a three branch system. Does anyone remember what occurred when President Obama won his first election. He attempted to create a whole new office and invade the white house. The officials at the time said that that had never happened before in the history of the country, and refused this. I don’t think anyone remembers this though.

  • Jerk99

    Too bad Republicans are too ignorant to understand what is happening and vote for their leaders anyway.

    • Ralph A Jansen

      Actually they understand all to well what is going on. (Remember, in research it has been shown that a Tea Party member is more scientifically sound than a liberal. They also tend to know more about what is going on then those who receive talking points in the mail or through facebook.) There is little truth on the internet because anyone can write whatever they want, fabricate research, and the sheeple will believe them. Perhaps that is why so many liberals…and a few conservatives are so easily misled?

  • Donald Congleton

    This is BullSh_t! What the Administration has done is changed the way that unemployment is measured. Salaried workers have always been screwed by the number of hours worked vs pay this is nothing new.

  • Michael Montgomery

    This is a numbers game hidden in smoke. You raise the so called salary level up to say 55,000 from the existing 23,660 you will not see individual income rise. As a matter of fact all it will do is create a couple more jobs for the additional workforce fillers. If you have a general manager and two subordinate managers. Each work 10 hours over a week on salary for 30 hours. At time and a half that is 45 hours of pay. Why pay the increase in pay to get them back on salary when you can simply hire another 40 hour a week employee and save 5 hrs labor cost? Then you can tell them if you exceed your 40 with the additional help you are terminated and we will find someone that can stay below it. Many companies refuse to let their employees work overtime already. So you loose the salary label and stay at the same pay and worse loose pay if you fall below the 40 for the week. Also the benefits can be cut further by hiring yet additional employees for the same job reducing hours below the minimum for benefits like insurance and ensuring they all stay under. This is not a fix.

    • Melinda Craig

      Let’s give it a try, trickle up for once. At least the working poor will have had a chance.

  • Herbie_Love_Bug

    @Guest Breitbart is a dead cocaine junkie

  • UncleBucky

    Don’t feed the “guest” or any other kind of trolls. They like the attention, just like a pet that likes its bottom rubbed.

  • Dan Francis

    I have one thing to say: GO MR. PRESIDENT!!! GOOOOOOOO!

  • http://www.lexalexander.net lexalexander

    Article would have been much better if it had given some indication who’s affected.

    • Ralph A Jansen

      There in is the rub. If you know much about politics and status quo, then you would understand this (if the article is even being truthful) to be a publicity stunt, and apparently will only affect a small number of people. (Managers making salary, not the average Joe worker making salary. In other words, those who would fall towards the “rich” side of the spectrum, not the average worker who receives salary because if they made hourly they would break the bank.)

  • Ralph A Jansen

    The problems raised by this article have existed for decades. (I know, I had this kind of job back in 1999, and the discussions about salaried positions had already been going on for quite some time.) Back when Bill Clinton was president the word going around was that one should never accept a pay raise to salary. This is a problem that has existed for a long time, and will continue to exist. Democrats will pull these out to beat up on conservatives, but there will never be a fix. This is called…politics. (poly-many ticks- blood sucking pests.) Then the media runs with a nonexistent story as a bunch of clueless cheerleaders. All the while, nothing really changes. The response by the people who want to rile everyone up usually affects only a small number of people, and this change is considered harmless to the status quo. You will never see a move to make every salaried position, or a large number of salaried positions into hourly wage positions. It will never happen. The abuse of this will never stop either. The boss will try to fool you by saying we are going to give you a few thousand dollar pay raise, while putting you on salary instead of hourly. You may have been making seven or eight thousand more while on hourly due to overtime, so you just took what is in essence a pay cut.

    News media such as this site should stop pandering to politicians and talk about things the way they really are. Fox new is a little better about this when they just put out information without the editorializing.

    I think the mission of media today is to keep people’s eyes off the truth. Perhaps if you did more research and look at how America was year ago, and how America is now, you might get an idea of what is going on.

  • aleatharhea

    Why the emphasis on managers? Non-managers work just as hard, often much harder. In my last job - during the Bush years - I was routinely pressured into working tons of overtime, for absolutely no money, and they kept telling me I should be glad I had a job.

  • Ralph A Jansen

    Yes, the democrats have been very good at wasting our money. (Put it into perspective, the Democrats controlled congress until last year, so….) Congress has not refused to compromise. The President has promised to be transparent. Cameras and the public are shut out of the actual discussions, and we have no idea how the final answer was reached. The actions of our president have no parallel in history. Conferences on fiscal responsibility. Can you name one president besides Obama who has led congress in a discussion of fiscal responsibility? (After he and his wife fly to the same place, on the same day, on two separate planes requiring money to basically be thrown around.) Oh, also trying to make First Lady paid position. (Not like he doesn’t have enough money already.) Just who do we have in office?

    Every time congress called for compromise to not shut down the country, all they heard was no. Compromise is not, accept my position and we will call it compromise. President Obama has been my way or the highway for a long time now. Now that Republicans actually have control, congress is doing things. (I forget how many bills they said that Reid was just sitting on. I think it was well over 500.)

    The President is not the primary contact for dealing with foreign governments. President Wilson found that out the hard way. (Did you ever wonder why we have the United Nations and not the League of Nations…(so Marvel sounding). The Senate is the approval authority for any treaty or international agreement such as the one that would come out of any talks with Iran.

    The media has not been presenting any facts as they have been the voice of the administration and not the truth. We can no longer trust the media to present any truth, and it has been that way for some time now. (Decades even.) They are very good at manipulating people because many people only get their information from the media. (Conservatives call them “low information voters”.) I bet you are one of those who believe that there is a race problem in America perpetuated by conservatives, that there is a war on women perpetuated by conservatives, and that conservatives founded the KKK. (Actually, democrats founded the KKK, read your history.)

    There are quite a few people in congress who call themselves conservatives, who actually are not. They did not vote according to the base who voted them in. There is a case where a candidate was found to be a democrat who had switched parties prior to running as a candidate.

    Also, from what I understand, we are one of the few countries in what we call the civilized world, that does not require identification to vote. Of course if we require identification to vote, and other such measures, liberals won’t be able to bus people to other voting precincts like they did in 2012. (Or register Mickey Mouse to vote like they did in 2008. That was actually funny. Not to mention registering dead people.)

    As for how government is supposed to work, yes I do know. I also know that the president is acting on things which the constitution forbids. (For instance, this whole immigration thing is not mentioned in the constitution, where it says that anything that is not mentioned is left to the states…)

    • Vartra Antonelli

      Alright, since you pay no attention to fact, I’m done responding to you. You have proved in your last response that you pay no attention to fact. That is all I am going to say and nothing you say after this will be listened to. You say “Compromise is not, accept my position and we will call it compromise. President Obama has been my way or the highway for a long time now.” but that is not the facts. The facts say Obama says “If you send me this that I am absolutely and diametrically opposed to I will veto it.” and congress sends him EXACTLY that and complains he won’t compromise. Also you point to the democrats being the ones wasteful in congress until this last midterm, but you CLEARLY don’t understand that the party in minority has full power to block and shut down everything the majority party does, case in point the six years prior to this midterm. So you take your non-facts and shove off. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts. When you realize accept that, you can come back to the big kid table and talk.

      • Ralph A Jansen

        I forgot how they blocked Obamacare. Sorry

      • Ralph A Jansen

        Did anyone ever tell you not to drink the kool aid? Having been in the military, I have had first hand experience with some of those policies that were my way or the highway. The lied to a lot of people, and ignored many Soldiers in decisions made. (Did you know that over 75% of marines were opposed to decisions made that directly affected them. His way or the Highway. They ignored everything. Now look at where we stand. There is a supposed war on women by conservatives that a woman actually acted shocked on TV and asked since when? Tensions in this country are at an all time high, and the fire is being fed by liberals. (Conservatives are reacting, as those who attempt to keep the status quo (what conservative means in politics) react to actions taken by liberals.)

        You may believe that liberals are not divisive, so why else would liberals create the KKK?

  • Andrew White

    Money isn’t real. It has only what value you put on it. Live less expensive lives and your money will be worth more. Buy frivolously and your expenses will always exceed your income. I could care less what is payed wage wise. Long live communism

  • joecooling

    Again the bully Republicans push Obama down and steals his lunch. Again Obama plants a turd sandwich for them to steal.