Mike Huckabee: Supreme Court ‘Cannot Overrule God’ On Marriage Equality (VIDEO)

Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee spoke to the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference in Houston, Texas, on April 29, in advance of an expected announcement of a presidential bid. Of course, Huckabee, a former Baptist preacher, had to weigh in on the Supreme Court’s upcoming ruling on marriage equality.

According to CNN, Huckabee told the conference,

I respect the courts, but the Supreme Court is only that — the supreme of the courts. It is not the supreme being. It cannot overrule God. When it comes to prayer, when it comes to life, and when it comes to the sanctity of marriage, the court cannot change what God has created.

In the speech, which CNN described as “sermon-like,” Huckabee touched on a variety of social issues that are of concern to Christian conservatives. One of those is the various “religious freedom” laws that are appearing in many areas of the country. Huckabee told the crowd that Christian business owners were being “criminalized” for refusing to participate in things like same-sex weddings. He said, “Somebody’s got to be willing to take on the institutions that challenge and threaten our ability to believe as we believe, because when religious liberty is lost, all liberty is lost.”

Just what definition of “marriage” does God use?

Those opposed to marriage equality have been saying recently that marriage is between one man and one woman, “as ordained by God.” But, the Bible offers an array of marriages that were “ordained by God.” In 2013, the Huffington Post reported on an op-ed by three religious scholars, that pointed out the different types of marriage that had the blessing of the almighty in Biblical times.

In the op-ed, which is no longer available from the Des Moines Register, where it originally appeared, but which is quoted at length at Patheos, the authors point out that the Bible approves of marriages that range from monogamy, to marrying your brother’s widow — even if you are already married. The authors also say that polygamy was ok, as it was practiced by both Abraham, and David.

University of Iowa professor Robert R. Cargill, one of the authors of the op-ed, told the Huffington Post that the Bible endorses many types of relationships, but that professors shy away from discussing that fact, for fear of the backlash they would receive. Cargill said that the “argument against same-sex marriage is wholly unsustainable. We all know this, but very few scholars are talking about it, because they don’t want to take the heat.”

Maybe the Supreme Court can’t overrule God on marriage equality. But maybe it would be a good idea for God to issue a clear ruling on the subject. Until that happens, we only have the so-called “divinely inspired word of God,” that Mike Huckabee and so many others claim to be experts on, to go by. And that says that God is probably cool with marriage equality.

Here’s a report from the Huffington Post, on what the religious scholars had to say about the Biblical definition of marriage:


Featured image via Gage Skidmore/Flickr

Send to Kindle
  • http://www.thebajeezus.com/ The Bajeezus

    Will somebody please explain to me, as if I were a child, how this kind of rhetoric isn’t treasonous? How can a person square the circle of living under the laws of one country while subverting them if they are not compatible with the laws of a foreign dictator? Personal religious liberty is one thing, but subverting the laws and ideals of an entire country for the sake of imposing theocratic law? How is Huckabee not being investigated for calls to treason?

    • v2787

      Because he’s not an elected official, and he has the right of free speech. He’s a theocrat, of course, but he still has the right to say what he wants as long as he’s not holding public office.

      • http://www.thebajeezus.com/ The Bajeezus

        Oh, of course, I get that he has 1st Amendment rights. But he WAS an elected official, is likely to run again, and his speech is aimed toward lawmakers. HE doesn’t have the power, but his goal is to influence lawmakers in that direction. That’s more of what I meant.

  • PeedroPaula54

    As Jon Stewart pointed out, “Before the last century, it wasn’t one man and one woman. It was one man and his new piece of vagina property.”

    • stevie1910

      Did Jon Stewart also point out that the first mentioned bigamist in the Bible iwas a descendant of the murderous Cain? Did he make mention that Lamech the bigamist was also a murderer and the he wrote a song bragging about the murder? See Genesis 4:16-24 Then go to Matthew 19:1-8

      • PeedroPaula54

        No. Why would he? And why should I? I had my fill of scripture growing up in church, thank you very much.

      • RB

        No, but I read a Dr. Suess story that was pretty interesting and has more credibility than the book you’re referring to.

        • harebob

          Agreed At least it has some clever rhyming parts.

      • Philip Schafer

        What has that to do with what PeedroPaula said? Besides, if the fictional Cain were real, his wives would also have to be his sisters, right? That would make him an incestuous bigamist to boot. Inbreeding aside, if all of humanity sprang from the alleged first family, It would be pretty stupid of God to oppose bigamy since a lot of women would have been required to get the human race up and running. Cain would need a rather large harem, I would think.

  • stevie1910

    The question is how does God define what a marriage is? Who would know better than the Son of God:….”Have you not read that He that made them, at the beginning made them male and female and said,’ for this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two will become one flesh?’ So then they are no longer two but one flesh.” Matthew 19:4-6

    • talonts

      Useless trivia. Marriage has existed far longer than the Bible or any Abrahamic religion/belief has. IOW, longer than man’s creation of “god”.

      • stevie1910

        What ever

      • Tony Thompson

        Shhhh. The truth really hurts some individuals.

    • Tony Thompson

      That question and the answer that you’ve chosen are perfectly fine-in a church where they belong. This country is a secular democracy (in theory), and its laws are not and should not be decided by a book of mythology that only some citizens follow. There is a reason the separation of church and state exists. It benefits believers like yourself and non-believers like myself. You wouldn’t want to have a religion imposed upon you or be forced to adhere to the beliefs of other religions, would you?

      And really, I have to laugh at the fact that you’re quoting a collection of manuscripts composed over the last few thousand years and whose authors understood very little of humanity or the world around them. But hey, if you want to believe in one of the thousands of mythical gods humanity has created, go for it. Just keep your god and your beliefs out of public policy.

      • stevie1910

        Have fun

    • raytheist

      There is no copyright or trademark on anyone’s marriage license. Doesn’t matter what the Bible says. Marriage is a social construct, with rules and guidelines developed by whatever society it is practiced in. Humans have been implementing all sorts of social institutions for over 100,000 years; European humans domesticated the wolf over 10,000 years before ANY of the currently popular gods were even invented. So, anybody’s god can dictate to his followers how their marriage ought to be, but it has no bearing on the rest of us.

    • Sherri G

      There are 40,000 versions of Christianity, 1,000 versions of the Bible, and 3,000 different Gods and Goddesses worshipped around the world. YOUR version does not get to be shoved on the rest of us!

      Marriage is a CIVIL contract which can be traced 10s of thousands of years ago…I.e. WAY BEFORE Christianity ever existed!!! It was a civil contract to populate the tribe, settle disputes, create allies, and share resources. To say its NOT a constitutional right or a secular event clearly shows ignorance. You can get “married” via a wedding 50 million times but if you don’t go to a CIVIL building, pay a fee, and have a CIVIL JUDICIAL STAFFER sign off on that very important piece of paper, you will NOT be recognized as a couple nor receive any employee, city, county, state, or federal rights or benefits as a married entity.The church didn’t begin serving weddings until the 15th century.

      • stevie1910

        Interesting

  • http://apainedlife.blogspot.com/ Carol Levy

    Huckabee has banned me from his FB account because I have the nerve to couner his lies with truth and facts from unbiased sources (as opposed to his facts from Fox and right wing mouthpeices.)
    This guy and his brethren are the face of the American Taliban wanting the US to become a theocracy of their religion and having to follow and do what they think they is right as opposed to the actual US where we have the right to have or not have a religion and actually have thoughts and speak out

  • 2Smart2bGOP

    Mr Huckabee; please read, then re-read the First Amendment to the Constitution of The United States. Then go away and STFU.

  • mimi2832

    I love Betty!

  • Garrett Menard

    Yes it can MICKIE; JUST WATCH!

  • Sherri G

    There are 40,000 versions of Christianity, 1,000 versions of the Bible, and 3,000 different Gods and Goddesses worshipped around the world. YOUR version does not get to be shoved on the rest of us!

    The church didn’t begin serving weddings until the 15th century. Marriage is a CIVIL contract which can be traced 10s of thousands of years ago…I.e. WAY BEFORE Christianity ever existed!!! It was a civil contract to populate the tribe, settle disputes, create allies, and share resources. To say its NOT a constitutional right or a secular event clearly shows ignorance. You can get “married” via a wedding 50 million times but if you don’t go to a CIVIL building, pay a fee, and have a CIVIL JUDICIAL STAFFER sign off on that very important piece of paper, you will NOT be recognized as a couple nor receive any employee, city, county, state, or federal rights or benefits as a married entity.

  • v2787

    Huckabee is referring to HIS version of God. After all, that’s what religion does: it creates a version of what they think is best (which usually coincides with what is good for the “leaders” of that religion) and then tells everyone to adhere to that vision or else God will be pissed. They love to create God in their own image.