Enough To Make A Republican Sick: Obamacare A Success Says American Medical Association

It’s certainly no secret the Republican Party has spent a LOT of time trying to make the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) go away. After six votes to outright repeal the Act, there were over 50 votes on defunding measures which would have crippled Obamacare, and on delaying implementation of certain provisions. Still, like “The Little Engine That Could,” Obamacare chugged along, doing what it was designed to do — give people access to affordable healthcare.

Well, that little train has done its job — at least according to the American Medical Association (no slackers when it comes to analyzing health data). In an abstract published in The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), an analysis was performed of the first two open enrollment periods of the Affordable Care Act. The conclusion?

The ACA’s first 2 open enrollment periods were associated with significantly improved trends in self-reported coverage, access to primary care and medications, affordability, and health. Low-income adults in states that expanded Medicaid reported significant gains in insurance coverage and access compared with adults in states that did not expand Medicaid.”

In layman’s terms —

  • 10.2 million Americans have received private coverage through Obamacare.
  • Another 12.2 million have been covered by Medicaid and the Children’s Health Program.
  • Costs for Medicaid have dropped dramatically and the program is fully funded for the next thirty years.
  • There was an 11.9 percent decrease in uninsured Latinos; a 10.8 percent decrease in uninsured African-Americans.
  • States with Medicaid expansion programs showed the most improvement in coverage and healthcare availability.

Even in the face of these overwhelming statistics, we will soon be hearing Republican candidates on the attack.

OBAMACARE IS A FAILURE!

ELECT ME!

REPEAL IT!

Is that really what is best for this country? We believe the answer is a resounding HELL NO!!!

Featured image courtesy of theobamadiary.com

  • Dan Mask

    You could have 100% coverage and the GOP will still find it to be a problem program because of who implemented it.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=541856128 Mike Rose

      Obama could find a cure for cancer and the repubs would blame him for putting the oncologists out of work…

  • MistressTime

    It doesn’t matter what the tpubs think. Obamacare is here to stay. Thank God.

  • Denton Young

    What I find hilarious is that RomneyCare, to give it its CORRECT name, was originated from the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation and first implemented on a state level by Governor Romney in Massachusetts. You’d think that the Republicans would be (deservedly) claiming credit for this awesome program, not fighting against it.

    • Joe Langella

      There is a vast difference between what is state run and what is federal run.
      One is legal one is not plain and simple.
      The 18 enumerated powers granted to the federal government does not include health care the states have that power.
      That’s the difference overreaching federal government leads to totalitarianism which we are getting closer to every day

      • Rick morton

        Wellll…according to the Supreme Court of the United States, it is legal.

        • Joe Langella

          Rick Morton
          That’s the problem
          We allow the overreaching supreme Court to rule the country .
          I bet you did not think it was legal when they said internment was legit or citizens united or hobby lobby did you?
          If you would just read the constitution you would realize they had no power to even rule on it as it is not one of the 18 enumerated powers granted to the federal government.
          This county was built on those laws that allowed us the freedom to prosper.
          The more the government does for us the less freedom we have.
          That’s why we continue to evaporate the middle class neither side wants the middle class to prosper because if middle class was abundant there would be less need for government dependants.

          • Eli Cabelly

            So you want to kill people, Joe, just because they’re poor.

            Got it.

          • Joe Langella

            Eli Cabell
            Save the sarcasm for people gullible enough to buy it.
            I don’t
            I would love to see everyone be able to afford insurance we still have 30 million that don’t so this is just a band aid on something that needs surgery.
            I just don’t want the inefficient federal government running it.
            Why is that so hard to grasp?
            What federal agency can you name that has been efficient?
            It surly is not the V.A. because I have used them and there a joke.
            There are many ways to reduce the cost of health insurance and without getting into the specifics of that it’s going to take lots of research and compromise for that to happen
            But what we have now was built to fail everyone knows that even Johnathan Gruber said it it’s designed to bring in single payer down the road when it does fail
            Which will not be better than what we had before Obama care

  • David Bailey

    Here we go again, deluding ourselves into thinking that the recitation of ACTUAL FACTS regarding a particular issue will persuade Republicans to change their minds. This tactic simply does not work . . .

    - Doesn’t work in attempting to prove the value (and necessity) of the ACA.

    - Doesn’t work on climate change.

    - Doesn’t work on Planned Parenthood (GOP will NEVER come round to support their essential work on women’s health matters, no matter what the evidence).

    - Didn’t work in the Hobby Lobby decision made by the Supreme Court quite recently: they sided 5-4 with Hobby Lobby, who stated they BELIEVED that certain contraceptives induced abortions, despite the FACTUAL evidence presented by medical experts that the contraceptives in question did NOT do this.

    Democrats need to make their case at a more emotional (rather than rational) level. So instead of abstract data on improved coverage and better access, tell the stories - all the many, many stories - of real people who are alive today precisely because the ACA afforded them the possibility of obtaining needed treatment.

    • Joe Langella

      David Bailey
      More emotional?
      That’s all democrats do is make decisions based on emotions not logic
      That’s why every policy you have fails

  • doridori

    That greasy smell in the air is all those Republican overly large Lizard Brains (scientifically proven with MRI s! So cool!) frying inside their pointy little skulls… Good, let’s now get to work cleansing the gene pool.. You have to pass an IQ test before you can father a child!

    • Joe Langella

      Doridori
      But that would mean their would be no democrats left?

      • Eli Cabelly

        Young people tend to be more liberal than older people. That means that republicans tend to have democratic children.

        • Joe Langella

          Eli Cabelly
          That true I was a democratic until I learned what they stood for.
          And lots of people like the idea of having government take care of you from cradle to grave.
          They tend to be the ones that don’t like competition
          Or not ambitious.
          Once one finds that hard work will bring rewards
          Is when they tend to switch to republicans.
          Almost everyone receiving benifits from the feds tend to be democrats
          Hard to compete with free stuff from others .

          • TweedleDee

            Joe, you have no idea what a liberal is. You spew the same gop crap that the rightwing yakkers have been. Most red states (Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana and you know the rest) are the biggest recipients of Federal help. Truth be know, the goppers numbers are shrinking. The only reason they are still relevant is voter suppression, election fraud, gerrymandering and a bunch of low population “red” states that get 2 Senators like everyone else. The gop controls the Senate and the House even though by popular vote they get trounced every election. This too is changing as new laws like Oregon making voter registration automatic and states giving redistricting duties to a citizen panel instead of the state gerrymandered politicians. If it wasn’t for the under handed ways of the GOP, they would already be history.

          • Joe Langella

            TweedleDee
            Every word you wrote are the same talking points that democrats have been spewing for years.
            Unfortunately for you most are false narratives.
            Let’s take the south first.
            While the pecentage of people in the south receiving benifits might be higher it does not reflect the total numbers of people collecting benifits by far.
            That’s the false narrative your trying to sell.
            I actually had this debate with my liberal friend and we both pulled up the numbers from every state and added them up which was a tedious process.
            We both came up with the same figure which was 16 million more people in
            blue states receiving benifits.
            Bottom lie is it’s a false narrative your trying to sell on this issue.
            As far as gerrymandering goes what makes you think your side is not doing the same thing?
            They are.
            Just look at the new hud director Castro that is moving the poor democrats to the affluent suburbs to change the demographics.
            In other words gerrymandering.
            I live in Oregon and the new law is designed for fraud as there is no I D required

  • damitajo1

    Sorry - but this is not the position of the AMA. Instead, researchers wrote a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association - which is a research publication, not the official voice of the AMA. Change it. PS: I support Obamacare.

    • Joe Langella

      damitajo1
      you do realize that only 9% of doctors belong to the AMA right?
      Hardly a endorsement worth a line.

  • Joe Langella

    Only in the mind of the brainwashed left is the A.C.A. a success.
    Do you mean the proposed rate increase of a average of 23%?
    Or the deductible average going up to 5000. A year?
    And when the subsides run out in 2016 for the insurance companies do you think the rates will go down?
    I would gate to see what you consider a failure?

    • Basil Malik

      even if your statement is factual… I guess in your repugnican universe insurance companies weren’t raising the premiums every year?

      • Joe Langella

        Basil Malik
        You correct it would still go up because of so many not being able to afford the insurance.
        Obama care did not fix that problem did it?
        Out of 4o million uninsured only 9 million at best could afford it even with the subsides. And those subsidize run out on the insurance companies side next year.
        That’s because Obama care just put a band aid on something that needed surgery. .

        • Basil Malik

          You’re exactly right! The republican healthcare program created by the heritage foundation does not do all national health insurance should. THen again the rate of increase for premiums have been reduced and millions denied for preexisting conditions can now get insurance. To many that is life saving. I know your shtick isnt for saving anybody’s life til yours is on the line… but it sounds like you support single payer,

          • Joe Langella

            Basil Malik
            No I’m not if favor of the government running our health care system.
            Tell me one government agency that is run effectively? Waiting,waiting???
            That’s right there are none and never will be.
            A single payer would be better than what we have now but having the government run it would not be any better than the insurance companies.
            I would love to see the profit of health care taken out someway and plenty could be done to lower the cost and the pre-existing rule that the A.c.a.brought was a good thing as are a few other but overall
            It is just welfare distribution it picks different winners and different losers with a few exceptions.
            Do you remember the promise that Obama made that premiums would go down 2500.00? Only to have it go up that much?
            That’s the problem with government it never does what it says it will do how many examples do you need to figure that out?

          • Basil Malik

            blah blah blah… its been how many years the verdict is in. THe ACA has met or bettered expectations only limited by low information folk being duped into opposing their own best interest. Otherwise we would have single payer but you know low information folk scream the loudest what they’ve been told to scream.

          • Joe Langella

            Basil Malik
            The sad part is that low information voter your talking about is yourself.
            Have you seen the forecast from the C.B.O?
            They expect premiums to go up 23% this year and 52% next year when the subsidies run out for the insurance companies.
            of course that`s just the premiums let alone the deductibles will also be increased some as high as 10.0000.
            at that point it`s nothing more that catastrophic insurance which will bankrupt most of us.
            but of course you won`t look at this because it goes against your agenda

  • David Wang

    Two lives I know were saved, first chance at preventative visits, found cancer, treated quickly. Don’t like it, F%^$$# You. Tell that to the people you tried to MURDER.

    • Joe Langella

      David Wang
      For everyone that you say saved their lives I can name someone who lost there’s.
      That’s the problem it didn’t fix the problem it just made different winners and different losers.
      All Obama care is is welfare distribution like a modern day Robin hood it takes from the haves and gives to the have nots.
      And my opinion on that is it’s un American because this country was built on winners willing to work hard for there dream and that is slowly being taken away.

  • ajani

    whats new ?

  • Joe Langella

    TweedleDee
    But the numbers stay the same that’s what your missing.
    Big liberal cities have more people than the whole states your talking about.
    Poor people tend to flock to large cities because of transportation issues etc.
    But when you look at it from outside of your ideology large cities are all liberally run and have been for years.and they all have the same problem too many people collecting benifits and not enough working to support them raising the cost for the few left that have to work.
    Eventually middle class gets squeezed out from the plundering that is liberals being too generous with other people’s money.