WATCH: ‘Responsible Gun Owner’ Shoots 8-Year-Old Daughter Dead While Braiding Her Hair (VIDEO)

Well, here we go again. An 8-year-old girl is dead because her own mother dropped a gun while braiding her daughter’s hair, and it discharged shooting the daughter in the head.

Honestly, why the F*CK do you need a freakin’ gun to braid your daughter’s hair? Are there terrorists in it?

Marsha Lynch told police that she was brushing her daughter’s hair when a handgun fell to the floor and discharged, striking both of them.

Police said the bullet went through Marsha Lynch’s leg and struck her daughter, Sharia, in the head. Sharia Lynch died before she could be airlifted to the hospital. Marsha Lynch is continuing to recover from surgery at Floyd Medical Center. Three other children in the home – an adult son and two young daughters – weren’t injured.

Wait, stay with me, here comes the best part. Henson said investigators are confident the incident was accidental; they’re not investigating this as a murder or intentional shooting.

What. The. F*ck? How can you even respond to this as a logical person? A mother was careless with a non-safety’d gun which she was obviously messing around with in some way while she was braiding her daughters hair, causing her to drop it and have it go off accidentally and kill the little girl. Nothing to see here, according to the cops. Just another case of “spontaneous patriotism” in America. When the terrorists hear we will risk shooting our own children rather than be “disarmed”, surely they will surrender.

Watch the newscast coverage from 11 Alive, Atlanta below:

CBS46 News

Featured Image: CBS46 screen capture

Terms of Service
Please login to Facebook to comment

55 Comments

  • Rahne KCN says:

    Of course, nobody’s going to back Sharia’s law.

  • Otto Greif says:

    Another example showing why Obama supporters should not be allowed to own guns.

  • Independent says:

    Of course an article by a liberal lolol, key word “disarmed”, nice wording too with “responsible” to twist your point as the left usually does haha. Real journalists don’t push their ideological agenda!

    • Patrick Peppers says:

      I’d stay away from Fox news in particular and American news in general if you don’t want biased reporting.

    • Chiennoir says:

      Of course! Another post by a right-winger, with no less than 5 grammatical errors and nothing to say about the actual content. Get a life. No, wait… get an education. Then get a life.

      • Independent says:

        My time is precious so errors aren’t a priority in responding to stories that were not political but leave it to a liberal reporter to. Actually I’m independent because you’re 2 party system is just a facade. So keep sheeping along with the libby dems in lala land. Your ASSumptions are hilarious

      • TheTruthHurts says:

        Liberals NEVER have grammatical errors, on account of how intelligent and enlightened they are! You might want to check that space after your ellipsis or capitalize the ‘g’ in “get an education” before you criticize others’ grammar.

        • Chiennoir says:

          There doesn’t need to be a capital letter after an ellipse. Only after a full stop or a colon. Take that and stuff it up your Strunk & White.

          • TheTruthHurts says:

            That’s usually true, but “word… word” looks like the end and the beginning of two sentences to me. I think “word … word” is more common, although I imagine it depends on your style guide. My logic isn’t faulty, either way. Also, you should look up the definition of “ellipse,” oh enlightened one.

          • Chiennoir says:

            Wow, you certainly picked an important hill to die on, didn’t you?

          • TheTruthHurts says:

            So, suddenly grammar is unimportant because you aren’t as good at it as you thought? :) I haven’t died, and I’m not on a hill. The truth is, sweeping generalizations (i.e. “the poster is wrong about stuff because they are too dumb to use proper grammar”) is illogical, academically lazy, and bigoted. Mexican immigrants sometimes struggle with English grammar. Are their opinions not valid as a result? How about inner-city kids? Rednecks? Hipsters? What other group can we count out because they weren’t taught grammar?

          • Chiennoir says:

            Still defending that hill. Too funny. (Sentence fragments. On purpose.)

          • TheTruthHurts says:

            Are you mad that you’re wrong?

    • LostSok says:

      Okay, I “guess” you have a “point” since you put quotes on certain “words.” No way you could just be an “idiot.”

      • Independent says:

        And no way you could be a blind sheep of the libby flock. Independent would get you out from under their thumb and wake you up to the facade of my team your team read/blue bs.

  • Jim Chavez says:

    good thing she was armed, i guess braiding hair is very dangerous

  • TheTruthHurts says:

    Clearly, the woman wasn’t a responsible gun owner, or parent. How did the gun fall? Was she holding on to it while braiding the hair? Did it fall off a shelf? How can I keep my evil gun from spontaneously shooting me?

    I’m going to go with accident, as opposed to murder, considering the woman shot herself in the leg…

    • Lostchild65 says:

      So no consequences for the gun owner who killed her daughter are necessary?

      • TheTruthHurts says:

        Where did I say that she shouldn’t have any consequences? She broke the law, and needs to go to court, although I think a lighter sentence might be appropriate, considering she probably understands the consequences of her actions in an especially poignant way. Even if she’s allowed to have a gun again, I think she will have learned her lesson.

        I take issue with the headline. Clearly, the woman is not responsible at all. Mental illness? Alcohol? Drugs? Negligent parent (look at Sharia’s hair in the photo)? I don’t know any gun owners who would defend this idiot.

        • Lostchild65 says:

          Exactly, you said absolutely nothing about consequences for this woman who killed this child, which she obviously deserves, hence my question.
          Do you actually believe that this killer should be allowed to possess a weapon in the future?

          • TheTruthHurts says:

            Yes, forgive me for not immediately invoking the full wrath of the justice system on a woman who is probably lying in a hospital bed right now, thinking about how she accidentally KILLED HER EFFING DAUGHTER! 300 lashes for owning a gun in the first place, and 200 for being a stupid black woman who didn’t get a free abortion. Is that what you’re looking for?

            I’ll let the court decide whether or not she should keep her gun. I have a feeling she probably won’t want to touch a firearm for a very long time.

          • Lostchild65 says:

            Do you always resort to hyperbole when asked to clarify an ambiguous statement? Seeing as your user activity is blocked I would assume so.

          • TheTruthHurts says:

            What was ambiguous? My statements didn’t pertain to what you wanted them to, but that doesn’t make them ambiguous.

            You asked very pointed questions trying to indict me for not immediately calling for the legal system to chew this woman up, did you not? That warrants some hyperbole.

            My user activity is my own business, and my own level of privacy is completely off the topic, Ad Hominem. Generally, to answer your question, I am extremely patient and civil with grabbers like yourself, but for you, I made an exception.

        • Danny Wade says:

          Yes, every responsible gun owner reacts with horror when someone else doesn’t observe perfect safety practices, and says, “That could never happen to me, because (a) I have gun safety knowledge, and (b) I will never, ever screw up in that one area of life.”

          • TheTruthHurts says:

            “Perfect safety practices.” It sounds to me like Sharia’s mother completely ignored safety practices, and probably doesn’t know any gun safety rules.

            (c) Because not applying basic gun safety knowledge and common sense could cost me or others their life, just like if I veered into oncoming traffic on the freeway. I think you get it!

    • Raggaray says:

      I remember an ex NFL player who went to prison for shooting himself in the leg.

    • D Jean Benway says:

      accident that WAS preventable !!

      • TheTruthHurts says:

        Absolutely. Clearly, gun safety was not high on the priority list. What kind of moron would put a gun in such a precarious position AND have a round in the chamber with the safety off/without an internal safety?

  • marty lambert says:

    I think it’s cute and shows a lot of patience for Otto Grief to post something like that. I’m sure it took time, since he’s clearly only qualified to be writing with crayons or more likely his own feces.

  • Dominic Blais says:

    this is what happens when we let republicunts have kids

  • Raggaray says:

    Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. This mother was braiding her daughter’s and killed her with her fingers formed in the shape of a gun. Recently some people who were anti gay changed their tune when they discovered that their children were gay. What will it take for the people who say guns don’t kill people to change their tune?

    • Paul Craven says:

      Right guns don’t kill people, people kill people so the people should be licensed and required to pass a certification class. They should also be required to carry insurance just like we have to to drive a car.

  • Michael Gillespie says:

    Careless, clumsy gun owners and unsafe firearms, a potentially fatal combination. Any firearm that will discharge accidentally on being dropped is an inferior and dangerous piece of junk. But that is America today, a country in which criminally negligent corporations are allowed to manufacture and indiscriminately market inherently and unnecessarily dangerous firearms for purchase and use by poorly trained fools who have no legitimate need of them in the first place. Ain’t corrupt government and run-amok capitalism grand!

  • digger22 says:

    why was a loaded weapon without safety locks and clearly not on safety laying around children that it could be knocked on the floor anyway. why is she not in jail for manslaughter and endangering?

  • Erin says:

    Does killing your own offspring as a result of stupidity count as a Darwin award?

  • MaxMan says:

    It quite blatantly wasn’t meant seriously - it’s a reference to the commonly used (often misused) phrase.

  • PaC SGM (R) says:

    The national enquirer of the internet has spoken……
    I knew a kid that got killed when he was caught between a parked car and one backing up, what’s your point?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *