Righties Go Crazy Over Video Of Muslim Bakeries Refusing To Make A Cake For A Gay Wedding (VIDEO)

Right wing sites are having a great time, ripping liberals as they promote a new video of a man trying to order a cake for a same sex wedding from a Muslim bakery. “See,” they’re saying, “liberals are ripping Christians for being bigots, but, look at MOO-slims!!!” Of course, the video fails on several levels.

The video comes from Steven Crowder, who runs a site called Louder With Crowder. In almost six minutes of video, Crowder manages to be both homophobic, AND racist, along with getting his facts wrong.

Crowder opens by saying, “You’ve no doubt heard about the controversy of some states passing laws to protect religious freedoms.” This is followed by a clip from the movie, Sling Blade, where the main character, played by Billy Bob Thornton, says, “Not funny ha-ha, funny queer.” So, right out of the gate, Crowder admits that these laws are intended to allow discrimination against gay and lesbian citizens.

Crowder grumbles about the media making a big deal of “hateful Christians” refusing to bake cakes for gay weddings. But what about Muslim bakeries, he ponders? Well, of course, he has a video.

The video is so heavily edited that it is actually hard to tell what is going on. A gay man, or one who is playing a gay stereotype more likely, tells bakers that he wants a cake for the wedding of two men. One baker does appear to be telling the man that he will not make the cake, but in the other cases it’s not totally clear. In one instance, after the man describes what he wants on the cake, the woman behind the counter appears to say “ok.”

There are a number of comments that Crowder throws out about persecution of gays and lesbians in Muslim countries. This has been a popular theme of the right in recent days. Even Sean Hannity discussed it on his program with convicted felon Dinesh D’Souza. But, nobody has explained what the connection is to American law. Are they saying that the U.S. should allow the same kind of persecution that some Muslim countries allow? Or, are they saying that these laws aren’t so bad, because other countries do things that are worse?

Crowder misses the point.

Crowder is so into his righteous indignation that he misses some key points.

First of all, the media, that he complains about, has been talking about a Christian bakery refusing to bake a cake for a same sex wedding, because that was the subject of several court cases. If a Muslim bakery somewhere has refused to bake a cake for a gay couple, that couple apparently didn’t take the issue to court. And, since Christianity is the largest religion in America, it stands to reason that the issue would be covered as it relates to Christian owned businesses. So, Crowder fails in his condemnation of the media.

Second, owners of Muslim bakeries are subject to the same laws and regulations that Christians are required to follow. So, if a law says that Christians can refuse to serve gay customers, so can Muslims. If the law says that businesses have to serve everyone, both Christians and Muslims have to serve everyone. Crowder seems to miss the point that, had this been a real situation, and not a publicity stunt, those Muslim bakers were probably in violation of the law, as well. That is, if they indeed had all refused to make the cake. Crowder actually undercuts his implied argument about how much less tolerant Muslims are, when he admits that there were many Muslim bakeries that agreed to bake the cake. Which is exactly the same situation with Christian owned bakeries, so what exactly is the point, other than an attempt to smear Muslims?

Of course, Crowder has to play the “persecuted Christian” card. He claims that Christians are under attack all over America, but he can’t even point to a legitimate case to back up his argument. He offers the case of a Canadian clergyman who was prosecuted under a hate speech law in 2007. The evidence that Crowder displays on screen as an example of Christians being persecuted is an internet story about the pastor’s conviction being overturned. And, since when did Canada become part of America? Strike one.

His second piece of “evidence” about persecuted Christians comes from an opinion article written about the Affordable Care Act’s requirement for contraception coverage. That is a dubious claim to begin with, but it has since been put to rest by the Supreme Court’s “Hobby Lobby” decision. Strike two.

The third instance of Christian persecution Crowder points to, is the case of Wesley Modder, a navy chaplain. Crowder says that “gay men wanted to ban [Modder] from the navy, simply for his views on marriage.” According to the Military Times, Modder’s superiors cited several instances where the chaplain offered “inappropriate counseling” to sailors, including a comment that he had the ability to “save” gay people. Strike three, and, he’s out!

Here’s the whole, sometimes offensive, always ridiculous, video that your right wing friends are certain to be talking about, via YouTube:

Featured image via screen shot from YouTube

 

Send to Kindle
  • Terry

    They love to selectively edit things to make their point more clear…or muddled. If they didn’t refuse to make the cake, why is he screaming persecution? The American Right has a persecution complex.

    • Randy Breeser

      Of course…persecution is the road to infallibility. Once you can convince yourself of you own victim hood, you can justify any action. No discrimination or bigotry or flat out lies are out of bounds for the teavangilists or faux news worshipers since they are under attack from the liberal media and need to fight back. Right and wrong no longer enters into it when you can say “the other side does it to”.

      • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

        “the other side does it to”…. To who? You didn’t finish your sentence?

        • Randy Breeser

          meaning that in general any kind of reaction is justified when you can point out that the other side does the same thing. Referring to those who will not address the right or wrong of an action but simply justify their re-action by pointing out that there is a double standard on the other side, Even when that double standard is only assumed as was done by those commenting on the video.

          • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

            Are you saying the right should have the right to hang Gay boys and teens from the jib of a digger at the local football ground and start stoning women as well… Yea Sounds legit for xtians…

          • Randy Breeser

            I think you mis-interpret my response. It is the conservatives that refuse to debate the facts or the question of right and wrong but rather justify their actions by simply trying to point out that we liberals promote a double standard even when they only assume so.

          • Sam W

            But you see, the double standard was not carried out by the people doing the real condemming. That would be the true Liberals that stand up for the rights of everyone, no matter what kind of asshat they can be at times.

        • Darren Cohen

          Yes, she did finish her sentence and it is perfectly clear. Not sure what’s giving you trouble.

          • RoseSalevy

            I believe the reply began as a confusion in the grammar: “the other side does it to”, should have been, “the other side does it too”.

    • buricco

      Case in point, James O’Keefe

    • Sam W

      Right and he did not do a random sampling, he ONLY went to muslim owned bakeries where he knew what the out come would be.

      • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

        I thought the video was a mess cobbled together in some kids bedroom after school. Nothing more than blatant baiting. Even if the vid was done properly and it did show real refusals, it is no excuse to allow so called kristians do the same. The concept is reminiscent of the kindergarten playground….

    • Hugh Everett

      Good for the Muslim bakeries.If somebody comes into your place of business and you don’t want to serve them, just politely explain that the product will be expensive, and they might not like the quality.That’s not discrimination. You have a First Amendment right to be a terrible service provider.

      • JoeNCA

        He also did it in Michigan where, for better or for worse, it’s perfectly legal to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.

      • Terry

        I hope that’s sarcasm…otherwise, I have the first amendment right to blow their spot up and get people to boycott their services. I see a “Going out of business” sign going up in the future…

        • Hugh Everett

          You certainly have a First Amendment right to boycott, picket, and protest the bakery.When the federal government tells me who I must associate with and do business with in my own establishment, that’s tyranny.If the Klan came into your bakery and demanded a KKK Anniversary cake, I would love to see your reaction. You might bake a cake for them, but I would be afraid to take a bite of that cake.I can guarantee you the Supreme Court will eventually uphold the right of association and the right of religious conviction, just like they did in the Hobby Lobby case.

  • MyPetGoat1

    Not even going to watch…ass needs to get a job over at Fox!

    • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

      He doesn’t even have enough talent for Faux Snooze….and that bar is about as low as it can go without digging a trench…!

  • Dennis Frisby

    Can anyone explain tome why a WHITE, YUPPY ‘GAY’ man go to a Muslim Bakery for a Wedding Cake?

    • Greg Torres

      I dont know. Good cakes?

      • Dennis Frisby

        hehehehehehehehehehehehehehhhehehhe

    • MG

      Answer: Because it’s the beauty that is America.

      • Dennis Frisby

        So, a tired old fake gay on a edited video is buteeeeful?

        • Morgan O’Brien-Bledsoe

          No the freedom to pick a Muslim bakery if you want to is beautiful.

    • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

      Not a gay man and only trolling the Muslim bakers….Giant fail by a moron, frankly and a so called “kristian” one at that

    • Darren Cohen

      Because you can be white, yuppy, gay and Muslim all at the same time, just like any other religion.

    • Bobby

      You totally missed the point.

      This video of blatant discrimination went viral and the liberal media chose to completely ignore it just days after preaching for boycotts of Indiana. Either the Muslim bakers are wrong AND Indiana is wrong or neither is wrong. Yet in liberal media fantasy world, somehow, Indiana is wrong but the Muslims aren’t.

      • Brian L Clayton

        The reason liberals don’t care is because it’s obviously fake and there’s nothing to comment on….but, I’m sure the conservatives will find a way to make a scandal from it.

        • Bobby

          “It’s obviously fake”?? Really? Wow, you are that delusional that you just can’t admit that the liberal media is being hypocritical on this? Incredible.

      • JoeNCA

        Is that horse you keep beating dead yet?

        • Bobby

          Nice attempt at deflection but you’re still a hypocrite if you think the religion of baker matters when the said baker refuses to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

  • CognizantImpiety

    IF it were true, which it likely ain’t, then my take would be simply this:

    Fundamentalism is fundamentalism no matter the religion.

    Xians saying it’s OK cuz the *other* religions do it is kinda like saying they
    would jump off a bridge cuz the *other* religions did. Childish at best.

    • Greg Torres

      I agree that it is probably not true. But his point is at least partially that we are quicker to condemn christians for their bigotry. And this is true. The majority group often bears receives greater scrutiny. Fundamentalist islam us every bit as bad as fundamentalist christian but liberals will be less tolerant of criticism of islam than of christianity. Opposite of conservative reactions.

      • Goddes FourWinds

        Bigotry is bigotry, no matter where it is.

        - A Liberal

      • SoSezYou

        AND that’s a lie and YOU know it. Liberals want a SECULAR society , free of ANY religious influence. You want to discriminate and have LAW allowing you to? Wrong country.

        • Conservativessuck

          No, Mr. Willfully Ignorant, liberals want everyone to adhere to a little thing called the U.S. Constitution…you probably haven’t even heard of it.

        • cezook

          Liberals want a society where no one is allowed to shove their religion down anyone’s throat.
          This country was founded on the constitution, not anyone’s religion.

        • Steen Goddik

          how odd, that you feel a need to tell lies about others.

      • Captain Garrett

        Nope. I don’t want anyone to be discriminated against. But in this country, the power to discriminate falls largely into the White, Christian camp. There are a lot more of them with a lot more power over a lot more people.

      • Morgan O’Brien-Bledsoe

        You are 100% right. Christan’s are our largest religious group so, yes, they do take the majority of the scrutiny. That’s because they have received the majority of the privilege also. When one group get’s all the privilege when the time of revolution comes they get all the backlash. While liberals will go after a minority group that’s attacking another minority group that makes it the super minority and that means it happens less. So we have less opportunity to go after them.

        • Bobby

          But this was a perfect attempt to go after a minority group for discrimination and all you get is crickets from the liberal media. What hypocrites.

          • JoeNCA

            It has nothing to do with who did it. It has to do with where. If a Republican-majority Michigan state legislature passes legislation banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and the Republican Michigan governor signs such legislation into law, then there’d be a case.

            But it isn’t, and there isnt a case.

            You can sue someone for not breaking the law.

          • Bobby

            I already slaughtered this argument in a different comment.

            I’ll reiterate because I’m feeling generous.

            Your argument is that because Michigan ALREADY has laws allowing discrimination that it’s fine to discriminate but because Indiana tried to pass laws to discriminate, that is a problem.

            When I was 5 years old, I could’ve ripped this argument to shreds never mind now.

      • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

        Tell me, when exactly and in what state has Muslims enacted hate laws that target Gay people in particular. When and who was the last Muslim you heard coming out with the sort of hatred that emanates from the ugly mouths of such great kristians as Mitch McConnell, Teddy boy Cruz, Sara Palin or any one of many far right kristian Teabagger Repukelicans.. Just one example… One!

        • Bobby

          Umm… did you even watch the video?

          • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

            so you answer a perfectly legit question with a question and a silly one at that as I have actually commented on it elsewhere in this thread. Clearly you didn’t read through the comments and certainly didnt comprehend my question. Clearly my first question didnt register with you. In which state have Muslims had laws enacted that would dis enfranchise Gay people….????

            My question has nothing to do with a fake video which is over two years old and has been edited so much as to leave it unintelligible. So answer the questions I posted if you can with subterfuge.

          • Bobby

            Discrimination is always wrong.

            There is no requirement for a religious group to be actively trying to enact laws in order for a single act of discrimination to be discriminatory.

            According to you a Christian bakery refusing to bake a cake for a gay wedding is discrimination but a Muslim bakery doing the same is not?

            Also, the video is not fake and suggesting it is when we can all watch it and see that it’s not is disingenuous and ignorant.

      • Darren Cohen

        Your opinion without anything to back it up is meaningless here.

        • myfeethurt

          Really? Meaningless here like it is the gathering of the elders of the high court. Nothing but opinions come out of here, most void of fact so I think everyone is on a level field.

      • JoeNCA

        If a Muslim bakery in an area where such discrimination is illegal did discriminate in this way, they’d be subject to the exact same laws.

        Which in Michigan there are none. You can’t take someone to court of they didn’t break a law.

    • Darren Cohen

      That wasn’t what he’s saying. He’s saying Christians should get away with it under the law because other religions are getting away with it under the law. Of course, that’s blatantly false. As the article points out, if the customer doesn’t file suit, the business will get away with refusing service, no matter what their religion.

  • Michelle Klein-Hass

    If this is really true, I would find it equally repugnant to a Christian baker refusing to make a wedding cake for a gay marriage. Or a gay baker refusing to make a wedding cake for a straight marriage. Or whatever. To quote a meme that has been circulating, “We’ve been through this back in the ’50s and ’60s. You don’t get to choose who sits at your lunch counter.”

  • okiejoe100

    Well; there is room in Islam and Judism for discrimination. Both the Talmud and Quaran teach hate for the gentiles, and infidels. True followers of Christ however, are taught to love your neighbors even as love yourself. To do unto others as you would have them do unto you. To love your enemies. Jesus also taught us not to concern ourselves with the splinter in our brother’s eye when we have a beam in our own eye. So no matter how bad a sinner you think someone is, you are equally as bad a sinner if you judge them. God will judge everyone, including gay people. For someone to practice hate because of their “Christian beliefs” is nothing short of insulting our Lord.

    • Darren Cohen

      So you believe the parts of your bible that talk about Jesus, but god was a bigot back when he inspired the writing of the older parts of the bible? I guess he just ‘evolved’ on the issues?

      • okiejoe100

        I don’t know so much as to whether he evolved, or if he just decided to go in a new direction, but he sent Jesus Christ. The Talmud is not the “inspired” writings of the older parts of the Bible. (neither is the Quaran).

  • SoSezYou

    Only someone who has stupid as a basic operating status would find this to be a librul gotcha. If anything it proves the Indiana law, as proposed was flawed because it would allow Muslims to discriminate just it would have allowed Christians to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.
    He only proves the law is wrong and immoral…and of course deeply unconstitutional.

    So laugh it up, baggers.

    • Bobby

      The video was filmed in Michigan.

      0 = the amount the liberal media cared about this so yeah, ummm, that qualifies as a “gotcha”.

      • JoeNCA

        And in Michigan it’s perfectly legal to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. So there’s no “case” to be had.

        • Bobby

          Wow, great comeback.

          So Michigan already has laws that discriminate against gays so you have no problem when gays are discriminated against in that state but when Indiana tries to pass laws that allow it to discriminate too, that bothers you.

          Not only hypocritical but you lack even a basic understanding of how to argue.

          • JoeNCA

            It’s upsetting, but what do you do? We already don’t shop there, and there’s no legal recourse. Attempts have been made at every session to change the law, but have been blocked by a Republican-led legislature and a Republican governor.

            What more are we expected to do?

  • Morgan Glassco

    Notice that those shops never cited their religion? I feel businesses should get to refuse service but they should not be able to cite religion. We will inevitably go to war with ourselves when we finally have a conflict where two different religions are trying to assert their “freedoms”. Religion is a protected class in many instances federally, how dare anyone try to suggest they should have more “freedoms” that another citizen because of their beliefs.

    • jeffie washere

      I was going to post this (and did on the video comments a few days ago). Also, Colorado just had a ruling where it was okay for a baker to refuse to make a cake because what was on the cake was discriminatory. The same could be said about the cake in this video. Terrible false equivalency.

    • Satan’s Taint

      If you have a business open to the public, it’s all of the public, not a handpicked customer base. WTF is wrong with you people?

  • Morgan O’Brien-Bledsoe

    I love how he keeps pointing out how it’s illegal to be gay in a lot of countries in the middle east. Last time i checked we are NOT the middle east.

    • Bobby

      You missed the point.

      Where’s the outrage from the liberal media? They are silent on this but had no problem attacking Christian pizza shops (and rightfully so). All we ask is that they be consistent. Discrimination is ALWAYS wrong.

      • JoeNCA

        Where’s the conservative media upset that 147 Christians were killed in Kenya?

        • Bobby

          Looks like Disqus won’t allow links. But if you Google “fox christians reeling kenya” you’ll see the conservative media is all over this and you are, once again, completely wrong.

          • JoeNCA

            And ISIS beheadings of gay people were all over Huffington Post and gay media.

            So what’s your point?

  • Elizabeth L

    so, we are to compare Christians and Muslims….are there any others to throw into the mix? Doesn’t really matter which religion does it? Bigotry is bigotry, no matter the source. Everyone in America is free to have their opinion….but it isn’t right to discriminate if you own a business that serves the public.

  • donco6

    Another point about the video - he’s asking these bakers to put a picture on the cake. At least, that’s what it looks like sometimes - hard to tell, because it’s so chopped up. And the baker looks to be saying they can’t do THAT, but someone else down the street CAN.

    • RoseSalevy

      That is correct. In the Muslim faith you will only find patterns or abstract symbols, representative art is not allowed. Only The Creator is able to make representations. So, you’ll never see a portrait of the Prophet, even though he is the most revered person of the faith. Not sure how they get around that with photography, but Muslim newspapers have photos.

  • Daniel Teore

    you keep saying gay is not accepted by muslims over seas and that they are being killed, yet you fail to mention that christians in larger numbers, over seas are being killed as well.

    • Steen Goddik

      As are Muslims.

      • K.B.

        and Atheists.

    • JoeNCA

      Yeah weren’t 147 Christians just killed in Kenya?

  • Mark Kramer

    His point is clear, LGBTQ militants never used Muslim bakers as targets, the typical trap was never used against them and he is 100% right to show the hypocrisy.

    • Bill Sech

      Indiana State Government surrounded itself with Christian priests and nuns and specifically targeted United States Citizens for discrimination. The Muslims do it too defense is the whining of little kids caught beating up on their little brothers and sisters and are childishly trying to weasel out of it.

      • Bobby

        It’s not a defense. You missed the point.

        He’s saying the Muslims are also wrong. Or does discrimination only count in your book if it’s from a straight, white, Christian, man?

    • JoeNCA

      It has nothing to do with Muslims. It has to do with Michigan. It’s perfectly legal to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in Michigan. There’s no case to be had. Even if they did ask and they refused, that would be the end of it, because there’d be nothing to sue for.

      There is no hypocrisy, just business owners should be aware of local, state and federal laws that may apply to them, which may be different, just like the pizza place.

  • Adam

    once i saw video of the white house destroyed by an alien spaceship, did not mean it was real, this thing is so heavily edited i am surprised they kept the same outfits the whole time

  • Erik Widmann

    You are an idiot sir.

  • Sam W

    So what is your point? That the persecuted and stigmatized populations can be prejudiced as well? Tell Tell me how this absolves the unholy acts of the ‘ruling class’?
    Does the fact the put upon and persecuted are now prejudiced, mean that it is OK for the others to wage their prejudicial wars? I think NOT.

  • Auntie Techy

    deflection plain and simple. we’re not so bad look at them thar moo slims, back during slave days the same type of people said things like “their own people sold them first” and “we love our (nword’s) we take care of them like we take care of our most expensive and useful tools” this is inbred ignorance I don’t know if it can ever be unlearned.

    • myfeethurt

      Auntie, I think the whole purpose was just to show the skew. Look at the final four game press conference. Black player says “f@&k that ni¥£er about a white player. Crickets from the media. Picture the reversal, and there is expulsions, NCAA fines, apologies from the school president etc, etc. He said he was just joking. OK, as long as it was in jest. Done.

  • Chris geo

    Well first off the Muslim bakers did refuse to make the cake so in that this article did fail in proving a “falsehood”. Another thing to consider is this as a business owner I don’t need to have a reason you agree with to not serve you. I wool argue in 99% of refusal of services the two parties severely disagree on something thus the refusal to serve. Now if I refuse service it is certainly within the rights guaranteed by our first amendment for you to tell people about it and organize and in general hurt my business. That is how a “free market” works. What conservative Christians seem to be saying is please Mr. government regulate free speech to protect us from having to compete in a free market. Yes what is missed by almost everyone here is the party of less government, get off my lawn folk are actually rallying for more government regulation and not just regulation but regulation on personal freedoms. Because remember I can refuse to service you for any reason I already have laws that support that. What the conservatives want in a law is one that prevents those refused from taking action. …however I don’t think that any one has the right to sue over refused business. Unless it is a breach of contract is. Customer already paid and business originally agreed but later said no….anyway. Its clear that as usual in today’s politics both sides got it wrong.

    • Darren Cohen

      If a business can be shown to consistently be refusing service to a particular group, such as blacks or gays, or if they admit to it, they can and should be sued over it.

      Government is not inherently evil. It does a lot of good. This is one case where regulation is absolutely necessary.

      It is mostly the ‘party of small government’ that tries to fix problems that don’t exist with more government regulation. They want to suppress voting to fix nonexistent voter fraud, they want to ban marriages that harm no one and in general have government tell people how to behave in bed, they want government to indoctrinate my children in their religion at school, etc.

  • Michael

    It looks like they won’t (can’t) put a picture on the cake. Small bakeries may not have the equipment.

  • Stev Abdelkoui

    this guy is annoying !!!!!

  • me1952

    Should Muslim grocers have the right to refuse to sell liquor? Should HIndu grocers have the right to refuse to sell meat? Should the baker have the right to refuse to bake a cake for a white supremacist celebration because the views of the supremacists violate his religious convictions?

    Geez, almost looks like lots of people run their businesses in accordance with their religious convictions.

    • JoeNCA

      If you don’t want to sell it, don’t offer it.

      Problem solved.

      • me1952

        I agree, business people should be allowed to make those decisions, and to base their business decisions on their religious convictions.

        • JoeNCA

          I agree. If offering wedding services might violate your faith by providing them to the wrong people, don’t offer them!

  • nycmcmike

    This video is the most heavily edited and chopped piece ever.

  • John Hancock

    OMG!! This is so ridiculous!! Enough of this s**t!!!

  • Bobby

    Really?

    You’re actually going to defend the liberal media on this? Now I’ve seen
    everything. Just admit defeat and move on. You are a
    HUGE, MASSIVE hypocrite if you’re going to sit there and say that
    Muslims discriminating against gays is fine while Christians doing the
    same is wrong.

    Let’s make something clear: Discrimination is ALWAYS wrong. There are
    not different rules for different groups. If it’s discrimination when
    Christians do it, then it’s discrimination when ANYONE does it.

  • Bobby

    Tea Partiers are more educated than Democrats and even Republicans.

    Also, the majority of the US and Europe’s citizens support the death penalty. Look it up.

    • meinmd

      Why should anyone look up something that is not out there to begin with?

    • Bobby

      Sigh, apparently Disqus won’t allow links anymore but Google “Tea Partiers are more educated” and “Europe’s view of the death penalty”… 1st link both times.

  • mikieb

    OMG really you did a horrible job with this stupid you have no clue on how to work a person and Trust me your way was way too over the top wouldn’t do it for you do to your pushy..how dare you assume the middle eastern places would BLOW you up, God help us…stereotyping

  • JoeNCA

    He’s also asking in Dearborn, Michigan, where discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is perfectly legal.

  • JoJoViolet

    All I can say is that the bulk of the commenters here need a remedial class in reading comprehension. It seems most of the commenters are arguing with each other, not realizing they are on the same side.

  • JoeNCA

    In nearly all cases, the couples had worked with the vendors before, knew them and trusted their work. As you put it, it’s a special day and they wanted someone they could trust.

    Instead, they said, “We don’t do that for your kind. Go find a random person in the phone book instead for you special day.”

    Because Jesus.

  • JoeNCA

    As long as they don’t put swastikas on any cakes, then they don’t have to.

  • JP

    The real point in all this is that everyone, gay or straight, is a local, state and federal tax payer. All businesses in this country benefit either directly or indirectly from our taxes. They do not have the right to discriminate, at all, a tax payer, period. Don’t care if they like it or not, what religion they are or not, that’s the reality of the situation.

  • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

    What, cleaning the loos…

  • Pádráig O’Gáirmléadháigh

    In answer to all the homophobic morons on this thread who are tilting at windmills; When Crowder goes to a State where discrimination of ANY kind is illegal and makes an intelligible Movie about Muslim discrimination in the US then we will believe him. In the mean time he is just a big mouth with no talent and nothing intelligent to say or contribute to the narrative, other than lame and false attempts to prove that another Abrahamic cult is a hateful a his own, but mainly to create division and hate!….

  • Dot

    I would boycott any store who wouldn’t make a cake out of bigotry in their religion, so what’s this film makers point? That Muslims are just like Christians? I’ve been saying that for years. Except presently radical Muslims kill more people than radical Christians. But most of the radical Christians live right here in the US where we have rule by law, and they know they will be hunted down and arrested, unlike in the Middle East.

  • meinmd

    So…Christians == Muslims or is it Muslims == Christians in their actions? Wonder if that bakery will be closed down and someone starts a GoFundMe account for them? /sarcasm

  • srluke

    On the first strike, Canada is part of America and they consider themselves as Canadian Americans. The correct remark should have been, “Since when is Canada part of the UNITED STATES? Strike one.”