Painfully Ignorant Sean Hannity Doesn’t Get Why Gays Are Upset At Indiana Law, But Not Sharia Law (VIDEO)

Sean Hannity was joined by convicted felon Dinesh D’Souza on his Fox News show, to talk about the new “Religious Freedom Restoration Act” in Indiana. Never one to miss an opportunity to bring the Muslim religion into the conversation, Hannity wants to know why gay rights supporters are upset about the new Indiana law, but aren’t upset about Sharia law.

Hannity observes that homosexuals are mistreated under Sharia law, and says,

Gays and lesbians, they might disagree with me on gay marriage, or they might disagree with somebody — a religious person as it relates to their Christian views, but why are they so silent on the bigger issues of the day, which would be taking on radical Islamists?

Well, Sean, it might seem odd to you, but gay citizens in Indiana are seeing their rights threatened by Indiana law, not by Sharia law. But, that’s how Fox rolls. Everything has to be tied into the larger theme of “the Muslims are coming, the Muslims are coming!”

D’Souza responds to Hannity by making the observation,

Not only do you not see the left talking about gays and lesbians abroad, but even at home, you’ll rarely find homosexuals trying to force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for a gay wedding. In other words, this is a selective attack on Christianity.

The possibility that maybe American Muslim bakers (or, for that matter, Jewish bakers, or bakers with any religious beliefs other than Christianity) have never refused to bake cakes for same sex weddings doesn’t seem to have entered D’Souza’s mind.

Hannity doesn’t get why liberals are more upset over gay rights in Indiana than women’s rights in Saudi Arabia.

Hannity doesn’t get why the left isn’t concerned about gays being persecuted in Muslim countries, or, why liberals aren’t upset about women not being allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia. D’Souza thinks he has the perfect answer for that.

If they [liberals] were to mount a strong attack on radical Islam and its treatment of gays and lesbians, that would strengthen American foreign policy. That would make the case for more U.S. involvement or intervention. They don’t want that.

American liberals won’t condemn radical Islam’s treatment of gays and lesbians because it would “strengthen American foreign policy?” Maybe American liberals don’t have time for that because they’re too busy fighting radical Christianity’s treatment of gays and lesbians here at home.

Of course, Hannity also has to get in a subtle shot at Hillary Clinton, by bringing up the Clinton Foundation. He suggests that maybe that organization should stop taking money from countries that oppress gays and women. Those countries, according to Hannity, include Saudi Arabia, the UAE (United Arab Emirates), and a country that exists only in Hannity’s mind — “Imam.”

Here’s the conversation, via D’Souza’s YouTube channel. It’s seven minutes of Hannity insanity.

Featured image via screenshot from YouTube

Send to Kindle
  • marecek21

    Well, I would say that conservatives are more concerned with the infringement of rights occurring foreign countries than they are will such infringements at home. With this in mind, whose position makes more sense?

  • mary morgan

    Maybe because it would hypocritical to complain about what is going on in Saudi Arabia while it is happening here Shawn? Or because Saudi Arabia can choose to live the way they want and Americans can live the way they want?

  • SoSezYou

    Sean Hannity’s premise is flawed based on some crazy notion in his head that LGBT people are just fine with Sharia Law. I suppose, Sean thinks if you aren’t on TV calling for the Annihilation of the Moooslims then you must agree with everything they do. Also, the Indiana law affects Americans and is being forced on Americans….why does someone have to decide if they like a law or not based on the laws of a foreign country?
    The whole premise is idiotic and naturally is based on the ongoing racist dialogue from Fox News, trying to incite hatred against American Muslims. Of course they are always trying to do the same -incite hatred and violence- against ANYONE who aren’t as extremist as they are. Amazing we have basically a terrorist organization operating 24/7 on cable news. Using fear and disinformation to spread ignorance.

    • RAdkinson

      Marcus lit you up on RawStory. You arent even allowed to debate on that site!!! He shut you down FAST!

  • texasken

    Perhaps the article misses the Sean’s point. Tim Cook went all ballistic about the Indiana law and yet he and his company are making money off Apple stores in countries that KILL gays. This is the same sort of hypocrisy that NOW exhibits regarding the “war on women”, yet they do not decry the genital mutilation of young girls by muslims. This article suggests that all the gay activists are just “too busy” (sarcasm font employed) to speak out against the travesties displayed by intolerant people elsewhere in the world (and now here, by muslims). Give me a break. Your schedules are in no way that crowded. And regarding his comment about Hillary: her foundation does take from those whose countries and whose philosophies are bad for women and gays, so as a potential Presidential candidate, that is a relevant topic.