FOUND: The Most Misogynist Sign Of All Time Belongs To a ‘True Christian’ (IMAGE)


While perusing my news feed for some derp to share, I was fortunate enough to come across a picture that personifies the ideals of the Christian right.

Using bible verses as sources, this (I honestly can’t tell if it’s a man or a woman) makes the argument that women should be the subservient homemakers they were in the 1800’s.

Subscribe to our Youtube Channel

14288_1606880569544930_3193191820839391625_n

 

If this were just the fringe beliefs of a single dufus, or even the rantings of a small group of regressives, there wouldn’t be much to worry about, but more and more we see evidence that the extremists of the Christian right’s ideology is spreading into mainstream conservatism.

Don’t believe it?  Type “women should” into Google and have a look at the suggested results:

women-should

Rebooblicans have spent a great deal of time and taxpayer money pushing for women to be sent to the back burner of America. While not so blatant as the imbecile who took the time to have this piece of misogyny professionally made, (you can tell because nothing is misspelled), their hatred for the strong, independent women America is so proud of shines through in their archaic, sexist legislation.

Equal pay?  Nah.  Make decisions about your life and your body based on what’s best for you and not the bible-thumpers down the street? No way. Demand justice if you’re attacked and raped? It’s your own damned fault. Child-care so you can further your education or go back to work?  You decided to have a baby, you can pay for it.

So what should women actually be?

  • Loud.  Scream from the rooftops that without your contributions America would go directly into the toilet. More women are getting degrees these days than men, and when the good ol’ boys fade into oblivion it will be your wisdom and experience that moves America forward.
  • Keepers of equality. Real men and women don’t want a whipping post to do their dishes, they want an intelligent partner to share their life-experiences.
  • Submissive to Nobody. Pretty self-explanatory.
  • Absent from churches that demand this kind of idiocy.
  • Care-Takers of children. Absolutely true, though that burden falls as squarely on a man as a woman.  We should all be care-takers to our children. We should all be teaching them that in our ever-evolving world people like this jackass have no place.
  • Dressed however the hell you want to be dressed. Period. For a group that is so afraid of Sharia law this seems like quite the conundrum, doesn’t it?

The bottom line is, this person and whoever thinks this way shouldn’t be taken seriously, of course.  The problem is there’s an entire base of GOP supporters who, whether they are vocal about it or not, believe this garbage to be true.

Luckily there’s an entire country full of women who have already, and will continue to, prove them wrong.

Featured Image: Pinterest

 

 

Terms of Service

111 Comments

  • Kenneth Henderson says:

    The top picture of the lonely, desperate, oversized, idiotic Teabagger is an old photo. Yes its important to realize that these bozo exists, and no his point is not valid. He is just a lonely loser who will never find a decent woman because of what he stands for. (He’s the type that goes trolling for prostitutes, and then once he’s done with them, does his penance by going to church on Sunday, thinking he belongs, but I bet even his fellow church followers laugh, snicker, taunt him behind his back. He’s the lowest of the human common denominator. He’s the pathetic pity case.)

    • Jeremie D. Harget says:

      You know, I am with you all the way until you said “oversized”. We don’t need body shaming here.

      • Kenneth Henderson says:

        How is calling this lug oversized, body shaming? Its called honesty. I’m oversized (5’4″ 280lbs) and yet I’m comfortable with the way I look. Its called having confidence, and this “person” obviously doesn’t have it.

      • Kenneth Henderson says:

        Also, sometimes being politically correct has the opposite effect. When you call someone physically or mentally challenged, and you consider that politically correct, to the person you are referring to its disgraceful. Trust me I am not a politically correct person, I refrain using the word retard, but other words like disabled, handicapped, in my book are just fine. (Also my wife is disabled, she proudly calls herself a gimp, or she’s part of the “crip club” as in cripple. She finds the term challenged to be rude and disgusting, as to her, her Cerebral Palsy and Spinal Cord Injury are not a challenge but her everyday normal. See what I’m getting at?) I think you need to thicken up your skin a bit. Just my honest opinion.

      • regressive whitetrash GOP scum says:

        why not? the creep with the anti woman photo is fat because of his poor choices,,,beer and fried food and no exercize

      • Kim Serrahn says:

        But he is oversized, no getting “around” that. (pun intended)

      • Melissa Stern Meredith says:

        I think it is fair to bring up this man’s weight. He bases his opinion on women on information in the bible, yet he violates the 7 deadly sins. Gluttony is a sin that this man is obviously committing.

      • suki says:

        FAT IS FAT! GET OVER IT.

    • Jerry Callender says:

      WHAT???
      I thought it was a woman holding the sign, and now you try to convince me it’s a dude???

    • M Diaz says:

      “and no his point is not valid”
      sure it is. it’s in the bible.
      those that are editing the bible are the extremists, this person is not willing to
      undermine the SUPPOSED authority of the buybull…

  • James North says:

    Ahhh, a return to the “good old days”…1920, 1930, 1940, 1950

  • lilyannerose says:

    These jackasses must be SO JEALOUS of Muslims.

  • Kristin Evans says:

    Maybe that lady is right…

  • Laurie Neufeld says:

    Looks like the sign holder has forgotten to read the part of the bible detailing the seven deadly sins…

  • Helena48 says:

    I thought it was a woman? Is that really a man?

  • Sunwyn Ravenwood says:

    He (or she or it) is too wordy. The Nazis got the whole message into 3 words.
    “Kinder, Küche, Kirche” or “Children, Kitchen, Church.”

  • strongislander says:

    That thing holding the sign: is it even human?

  • Curtis Scarbrough says:

    To make this even more idiotic, I think that’s a woman.

  • Neptune says:

    That thing is being honest, that’s disgusting BuyBull is worthless.

  • Rick Derris says:

    Judging by the looks of him, he hasn’t known a woman in the biblical sense in a loooong time.

  • Lib_IN_YOUR_FACE says:

    I guess that worked in the bronze age or whatever. Try making that work in a modern relationship!

  • John J. Mulrooney says:

    Does the fat lady’s rumpled blue sign refer to the “Dead Bible?” That surely is prophetic. The Fat Lady sings as the sputtering Christian Evangelist semi-century succumbs to the dead weight of its own colossal ignorance. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust, bullshit to steamy bullshit, all soon lost on the wind, leaving only the pain and the stain of its own hatred.

    • regressive whitetrash GOP scum says:

      very well written,,,,highly accurate——I hope I see that in my lifetime as I hate all religions; especially American Taliban-ism

  • regressive whitetrash GOP scum says:

    PRAI$E JEEEE$U$!!!

  • RAS says:

    I think the only way this loser will get a woman is if she is totally lacking in self esteem and completely compliant, so…it’s a strategy for getting a wife!

  • Rhonda Thissen says:

    Wow. The comments about this guy’s physical appearance are just sad. What possible difference does it make what he looks like? His ideas – or rather lack thereof – are the problem, not his body size or appearance. How about we grow up and not act like the Party of Stupid?

    • Neptune says:

      Right, some sick buttwipe slinging poop at females in public using his religious dogmess should not be ridicule on all levels if he’s obese, got it!

      You’re the sad, and most likely obese, person here.

      • Rhonda Thissen says:

        Exhibit A. Thanks for proving my point.

        • Neptune says:

          Its obvious you’re proving your own point by trying to protect this obese lowlife simply based on how much this buybull thumper has gorged on crap since birth. Your buybull says what about GLUTTONY?? Its a SIN, dumb ass!

          Proverbs 23:20-21 warns us, “Do not join those who drink too much wine or gorge themselves on meat, for drunkards and gluttons become poor, and drowsiness clothes them in rags.”Proverbs 28:7 declares, “He who keeps the law is a discerning son, but a companion of gluttons disgraces his father.” Proverbs 23:2 proclaims, “Put a knife to your throat if you are given to gluttony.”

          • Rhonda Thissen says:

            Seeing as how I’m athiest, all of that “buybull” bullshit is completely irrelevant to my life.

    • regressive whitetrash GOP scum says:

      perhaps because a persons outside (usually but not always/see: medicl conditions) is an expression of whats INSIDE

      • Rhonda Thissen says:

        So you’re saying that people who are not conventionally attractive outside are equally unattractive on the inside? Bull. Shit.

        • regressive whitetrash GOP scum says:

          not at all,,,,,,,,,,
          im saying that when we make poor BEHAVIORAL choices which collectively lead to us looking slothlike and unkempt I am 100% accurate in saying that the sloth (QV) is suffering spiritually and thus is unattractive
          ====================================
          maintaining balance is hard; becoming lazy is easy–
          laziness is NOT atrractive–
          im not talking about personal tastes-
          Im talking about not caring about yourself

    • Jerry Dever says:

      Rhonda – these folks don’t get what you are saying because true liberals are hateful, spiteful, elitist, close-minded sheep. they can be as politically incorrect as they want but if you dare say something about rachel maddow or certain terrorists currently running amok in europe and you will catch all kinds of hell.

      • Rhonda Thissen says:

        Ummm, hello, I’m liberal. But thanks for playing.

        • Jerry Dever says:

          you may be but many of the sheep on this thread think they can be as mean-spirited as they want but are the first ones to try and control someone else’s words (especially someone that they don’t agree with). you are obviously open-minded enough to attack the issues but not the person.

  • Debby Berg says:

    Oh good another douchebag with a sign

  • David P. Turnbole says:

    The above moron is uneducated and beats off to child porn on his computer.

  • PamB1 says:

    The closest that dumb, unkept, ugly guy ever got to a woman, was the day his Mother gave birth…………WHY do you think he is such a woman hater…………..They smirk at him.

  • Neptune says:

    Someone remind this obese freak that his buybull tells him that he MUST put a KNIFE to his fat turkey neck if he’s becoming OBESE, for its a SIN!

    hahaha, oh the irony of stupid self righteous people!

    Proverbs 23:20-21 warns us, “Do not join those who drink too much wine or gorge themselves on meat, for drunkards and gluttons become poor, and drowsiness clothes them in rags.”Proverbs 28:7 declares, “He who keeps the law is a discerning son, but a companion of gluttons disgraces his father.” Proverbs 23:2 proclaims, “Put a knife to your throat if you are given to gluttony.”

  • Suzanne Ennazus says:

    As an Anglican, I find those Christians from the bible belt of the USA
    strange, as they completely ignore anything Jesus said about loving
    others and not judging, while they only follow the Old Testament. NT
    says this:
    Galatians 3:28
    There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

  • Suzanne Ennazus says:

    Surely he must be a troll though, as if he was a real Christian, Jesus said the most important things are loving others, not judging etc, but he seems to have spent ages finding a couple of verses to make it look worse, while ignoring others that promote love. Like how Jesus spoke out against stoning, when he said he who is without sin should cast the first stone. Spoke out against bigotry towards others with the Good Samaritan story. Said we aren’t male or female, as all one in Christ etc.

  • Dan Atatakai says:

    This person needs to be NEUTERED.

  • Henry Plantagenet says:

    The Man Least Likely to Reproduce. And thank god.

  • Larry Dague says:

    Yea because women line up for him…lol

  • Whaddya want me to do? says:

    Type “Obama is” into Google for some real laughs

  • Benjamin Dover says:

    Hows this, fucktards? As the father of 2 daughters, if any imbecile came around spouting this kind of nonsense, I would think long and hard about exercising my second amendment rights. The religious right and Tea Party are doing all they can to water down the gene pool in this country.

  • fbear0143 says:

    My question continues to be “Why do so many women still vote against their own best interests??”

  • cpopin says:

    Google doesn’t display anything, if you type, “women should”.

    • blabbermouth says:

      Perhaps they once did (who knows?), but thanks for testing the assertion being made. This is how science works, in fact. Nice going!

  • Brian Hayford says:

    Anyone want to bet that that guy is still a virgin?

  • Patrick O'Malley says:

    and the picture of a glutton

  • godivademaus says:

    Okay, if the author’s thrust here is to say these types of fundamentalists are “not” the minority of Christians, then you haven’t done your research. Mainline Protestants–members of such
    long-established, moderate-to-liberal denominations such as the American
    Baptist Church, the Disciples of Christ, the Episcopal Church, the
    Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Presbyterian Church, the
    United Church of Christ, the United Methodist Church, and the Reformed
    Church of America and Episcopalians–don’t usually do the sort of thing depicted here nor do they hold the misogynistic viewpoints so bread and butter to the Christian Fundamentalists. We call them “Fundys.” I get personally offended when the media uses the shorthand of Evangelicals to mean the Fundamentalists or the far-right conservative Christian identity types. But the plain fact of the matter is that the Fundys, the far-right conservative Christian identity types ARE the minority… by a really large margin. Do I agree that their vocal minority is problematic in our society? Absolutely, no question. But please, stop writing stuff that lumps these sorts of fundamentalists in with the larger, established, Christian denominations.

  • Gregg Brennan says:

    Says the guy holding a sign while sporting a mullet I haven’t seen since 1988, and who probably hasn’t seen any pussy since his mom squirted him out of hers. What a loser.

  • JanMutcher says:

    Titus is Not a book of the bible.

  • kelemi says:

    Sadly, many “True Muslims” could give these “True Christians” pointers.
    Wonder why so many are so critical of religion?

  • Nickie Kalla says:

    Absolutely agree with this article 100%! And I am a Christian. If it weren’t for Christian’s there would be a lot more of us that is for sure. Times change! We don’t live in a world where we sacrifice animals anymore, but I’d be willing to sacrifice this guy to Mars. I hear they are seeking willing candidates for one way tickets.

  • john Johnson says:

    If you think this is bad, you should listen to Phil Robertson’s views. The Duck Dynasty patriarch has publicly said: “An older man should marry a girl before she’s 14. So he can teach her what’s expected of her.”

    • Meepestos says:

      The last sentence in your post caught my eye while scrolling through posts and for a split second thought it was a quote from an official in Saudi Arabia.

  • Michael Clark says:

    See, here’s the deal: if you want to use the Bible as a reference, you need to read the WHOLE Bible, not just the parts you like. There are plenty of lessons there, indeed.

  • Stevecorbin says:

    Didn’t know they had cameras in the Middle Ages.

  • Leroy Hall says:

    fundamentalist Christians do believe what the above sign reads. The Bible even says what the above sign says. It also says that women shouldn’t wear make up. But Fundamentalist Christians also believe we are under Grace and not under law. Therefore the teachings of the Old Testament are not law, but history. Me? I am an agnostic. I believe a woman can be anything she wants to be.

  • Guest says:

    And that guy should blow it put of his. . .

  • Joanie Hepsworth says:

    And that honey of a guy should blow it out his . . .

  • Stephen Wood says:

    This won’t be a popular comment, but although the guy is misguided in his approach, those who believe in the Bible, agree on some of the things he probably was trying to accomplish. The scriptures he used for his poster are referring to specific cultural problems being addressed to believers in the first century christian church. Taken out of context or being applied to the world at large is a huge mistake and he should have known better. For the record, the roles of men and women are different, regardless of your belief system. We have different contributions to make to our home. Trying to make everyone the same is as insane as this guy’s misguided poster.

  • pennyjane says:

    “learn to (expletive deleted) grammar dude.” see you there, minus the mindless vulgarity of one who hasn’t learned to express himself without it. it’s called inference, you wouldn’t know about that, it’s one of those things one must be at least mildly intelligent to process.

  • pennyjane says:

    i am transsexual…..”it” describes inanimate objects, that obviously isn’t me…you are correct. “them” is plural, it is not appropriate to refer to one person as “them”. we don’t get to change to semantics of the language we’re using….you can’t co-opt the meaning of one pronoun to make it palatable to yourself and expect the rest of the language users to comply. if one is gender confused and unhappy with any of the pronouns presently in use then they can make up a new one for themselves and go through the long, tedious process of educating the public and then gaining acceptance for it….but you don’t get to change the whole way the language works….that will never fly.
    the “it” used in this article….i didn’t take as gender referenced, i think the writer was calling into question the animation of the subject….i think the writer wasn’t convinced of the humanity expressed.

  • pennyjane says:

    well….since the writer provides us with no context for the picture i guess we are supposed to just blindly think whatever he thinks. no context leaves me to wonder if this might not just be sarcasm, it sure sounds like it. the guy might just be pointing out how absurdly misogynist the bible is and how ignorant “true christians” are to consider that misogyny still relevant in our culture. the picture, for all i know, was taken at a counter rally where westboro type morons really were expressing blatant misogyny….this guy was just, in absurd, sarcastic terms, pointing an arrow at their own stupidity. charles, context is important to your story.

  • Mike says:

    I’m certain that this fine specimen of American male is beating women off every hour.

  • James Salomon says:

    I wonder if this guy has ever felt the touch of any woman other then his mom. Based on the sign he is carrying he has some very deep seated anger issues. I’m not going call him out for his ideology. It must be very difficult being him.

  • Gayle Satterfield says:

    Well at least we know this dude isn’t going to be enforcing his “rules for women” on anybody. Seriously, this dude is never getting laid, ever.

  • Lawrence Tyler says:

    How about Lardzarous (Lazarous)

  • Jesusiscomingandheispissed! says:

    Is that a man or a woman?

    No one would want him/her anyway.

  • Brian says:

    This is the typical delusional view of ” conservative CRISTIANS” especially men who are self proclaimed conservative Christians . the republican view of women is despicable just like their view of children, ( children should be seen not heard) The racist, misogynist twisted views of degenerate morons like this guy holding up that ridiculous sign is common where republicans are concerned. DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!

  • Ventress Dugan says:

    Ugly outside and ugly inside! We women have fought to many battles to let this(?) whatever preach crap!

  • Missladyhawke ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ says:

    So, she is going against the thing she is protesting?

  • [email protected] says:

    Man or woman, ugly just the same. Inside and out.

  • Ricardo Rebelo says:

    So what?! I don’t see anything wrong with that

  • 2Smart2bGOP says:

    As if being ugly was that guy’s only impediment to getting laid, he has to go and hold up a sign, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *