Bush Appointed Judge Screws Millions Of American Families By Halting Obama’s Immigration Actions

Republicans have coined themselves the “party of family values” to win over gullible voters for ages. This is, of course, complete and utter garbage because every time they have the opportunity to do something to help American families they end up screwing us without even buying us dinner first.

The latest example of how much the GOP hates families comes from Texas where U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen, a Bush appointee, has issued an injunction against President Obama’s immigration executive orders. The injuction prevents immigrants from applying for protection until a lawsuit against Obama works its way through the court.

The lawsuit was filed in December by Teapublicans in 26 states who claim that Obama’s actions are unconstitutional.

It is unclear how Republicans can determine the constitutionality of these orders when they never read past the Second Amendment, but they are trying.

In his ruling Hanen said that without the injuction, states would “suffer irreparable harm in this case.” He also said that, “the genie would be impossible to put back into the bottle,” and giving deportation protection to millions of people is a “virtually irreversible” action.

Well duh!! That’s the point! The sole purpose of Obama’s orders were to keep families (like mine) together and now, because of this judge, that is being ripped away.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest fired back at the ruling in a statement:

The Supreme Court and Congress have made clear that the federal government can set priorities in enforcing our immigration laws — which is exactly what the President did when he announced commonsense policies to help fix our broken immigration system. [Source]

This is because President Obama actually wants to keep families together. He’s not caving to xenophobia and hate.

Republicans, like the ones in the 26 states who filed this asinine lawsuit, pander to their hate filled, fear mongering, racist base and this “judge” is helping them further their cause.

Thanks Republicans! I’ll remember this when I hit the polls in 2016 and I’ll make sure everyone else I know remembers it too.

Send to Kindle
  • Carl Peal

    American families? If they are not US citizens, they are not Americans. Let them obey our laws first, then earn their citizenship like those that came before. JMO.

    • George

      “If they are not US citizens, they are not Americans” Really ? Go say that to the hundred of millions other people living on both the american continents ! Yeah true enough for you mexicans are even not humans, just slaves that you can exploit. use as target practice along the border… So pathetic !

      • Bruce Brown

        Technically that is correct. I support George in his statement and view. Coming here illegally does not make you an American Period. Seems clear by definition to me. Having anchor babies does not entitle you to stay.
        As far as hundred of millions f people living on both American continents. WTF are you babbling on about?

      • Carl Peal

        Who is pathetic? Me for stating a truth? Or you for trying to stir something up. I was speaking to Americans being US citizens. Most rational people would understand that. By your judgment, Mexicans are Americans, Venezuelans are Americans, and Canadians are Americans. In a broader context I won’t dispute that if referring to the American continents. But all citizens of those nations and more do not refer to themselves as Americans, but as citizens of their respective countries. Stop trying to instigate trouble and crawl back under your rock. How much are you paid to be a troll? End of conversation.

        • Jon Glass

          Please try to pay attention. The Executive Action does NOT make them citizens. It is aimed at providing temporary work permits and deferred status to those law abiding immigrants that have children or parents who are citizens and who have been lawfully residing in the country for five or more years. This prosecutorial discretion is within the purview of the Executive Office and facilitates the Constitutional requirements under Article II, sections 1 and 3 that the laws be executed as faithfully as possible under existing conditions such as ICE being woefully understaffed due to GOP budget cuts to enforce all the laws. I repeat…this EA does NOT make them citizens. So quit lying.

          • Carl Peal

            Glass: Perhaps you need to learn to read? The article stated that the judge was breaking apart AMERICAN FAMILIES. My comment that if they are not US citizens, they are not American families. You are correct that the EO doesn’t make them citizens. I never said it did. Now, “law abiding immigrants”? If they arrived here illegally they are criminals as they have violated our immigration laws. There is no other way to view this. Prosecutorial discretion? Obama can NOT change the laws of the nation by Executive Order per the Constitution, although he has done so for OvomitCare repeatedly among other things. To change a law it must be done by Congress, not ANY President. Regarding the cites you listed from the Constitution, they require Ovomit to uphold ALL the laws, including immigration laws, and he has NOT done so. It isn’t a question of ICE being understaffed as Ovomit’s orders NOT to enforce the laws. You are right, the EO does NOT make them citizens thererfore they are not American families. I have not lied, but perhaps you are. End of conversation.

          • Jon Glass

            Perhaps you yourself need to learn how to think Mr Peal? The EA addresses the tearing apart of the families of AMERICAN CITIZENS who have parents or children that are without visa. You seem to have missed that part. If they are families of American Citizens, then, by definition, they qualify as “American Families” and even moreso if you decide to widen the scope of the Americas to include Mesoamerica and South America. But we dont have to do that do we, since it is being applied first and foremost to families of American citizens it would appear.

      • AJLoca

        Um.. okay. I will. If they’re in one of the 50 states ILLEGALLY, they are NOT Americans. Period. When I go to Mexico, that doesn’t’ make me a MEXICAN.

        • George

          Can I humbly remind you that USA are but just a little part of the american continents (in case you didn’t go to school, there are two american continents, the northern one and the southern one). So claiming that only us residents are americans just shows the real face of many of you, selfish egoistic self-centered people, end of the story !
          Hooo And yes, I am one of the old dinosaurs from Europa. Remember ? where your grand-grand-parents came from as immigrants, not so long ago ?

      • PedroGonzalez

        George makes a typical dishonest strawman argument. What George attempts to do, is make false claims about what Carl stated or implied. Carl never suggested or eluded to Mexicans as… not humans, or as slaves, or as target practice.

  • DanaLanders

    CONGRESS has the power to legislate, not the WH! As Carl Peal writes, these ARE NOT American families, unless they are citizens, period! We, the American taxpayer will not sit quiet and allow our nation to be run over by a swarm of lawbreaking, uneducated, unskilled, unmotivated folks that we will have to support from cradle to grave. Not gonna happen anymore! We will fight tooth and nail until all these criminals get the message. Come here the legal way or stay away because we do not want you here!

    • Shannon Argueta

      Please tell me more about my family not being American when my child and I were both born here.

    • dragontech64

      “uneducated, unskilled, unmotivated”
      Way to wave the racist flag. MOST of the people who come here, either legally or not, do more of the back-breaking hard work most US Citizens view as beneath them.
      Additionally, the federal assistance programs you claim the illegals are getting at your expense, they CANNOT collect from. Citizenship MUST be established first, to collect, yet these same people are being taxed to pay for these aid programs. Rather than sounding like Rush Limbaugh Lite, why don’t you drag your ignorant ass out to do some fact checking?

      • Lockmanxo

        So cut welfare Snap, etc and put AMERICANS to work, in many cases whether they want to or NOT. I don’t care if they feel the job is “beneath them”, because after all…. equality? However I know friends who closed business and left certain states due to ILLEGAL workers.

        • dragontech64

          And I know businesses that had to close due to no workers when immigration issues were addressed by Rethuglicans trying to “Secure the border” because no “Real Americans” would do the jobs.

        • Jon Glass

          Spare us the bullshit. Do some real research instead of trying to give us the crap you have been spoonfed. 2/3rds of the people on SNAP are children, the elderly and the disabled…the rest is being taken up by people who dont make enough at their EXISTING JOBS to make ends meet because your paper heros refuse to raise minimum wage. Since you back such policies, YOU and your ilk are CREATING those working poor, not them.

          • Lockmanxo

            I would far rather help with assistance Americans WORKING and poor vs sitting on their hiney just TAKING taxpayer dollars and doing nothing. What does that TEACH??? I think most EVERY American should “contribute”. If that includes taking ANY job, OK. Meanwhile I has a neighbor across the street, EIGHT welfare brats, totally cared for by gumbt programs, while mom & dad did nothing, however they could go play B Ball, skate, etc with the kids, have BBQ’s, etc. Another neighbor had a nursing degree paid for by taxpayers, she refused to work…I want my welfare..I’m entitled.

          • Lockmanxo

            Also Joe, have you ever worked for minimum wage or less? I have, more than once. That encouraged ME to excel, learn more, to earn more, like 3x minimum, through MY effort. And as I had signed that my LEGAL immigrant wife and child could receive no “assistance”, I worked 2 and 3 jobs, while self and class educating myself. Ever picket fruit, cut vegetables? Ever worked the fields with LEGAL guest workers? Yes educate yourself. I have

          • Jon Glass

            So you think everyone should have it as hard as you had it? Thats just silly. People are not strangers to hard work, and I certainly will not begrudge someone having it better than I have had or do have. Why should you? are you so miserly and poor that you have to kill your compassion to rationalize stealing benefits from children, elderly and crippled at the top of the garbage heap? Wake up dood. It doesnt have to be that way. This is America. We are the richest country in the world…not the 3rd world country and economy you would have it be. There is no reason to starve people or make their lives miserable. Why do you promote misery? Do you seriously think that is an “American Value?” You are not the only one who seeks to get ouf of the welfare rolls..the average stay on welfare has been 4.5 years..both before Newtie did his draconian cuts with his infamous “contract on America” and since. Quit manufacturing fables to inflate your phony sense of righteous indignation with. It doesnt fool anyone but yourself.

          • Jon Glass

            You also conveniently forget that the job market got flooded with overqualified people with the crash that your 8 years of deregulation caused. People who were pulling down 100k a year were suddenly finding themselves lucky to be making minimum wage. A minimum wage is what marx said was the bare minimum needed to keep a worker alive enough to keep working. What in the hell do YOU call a minimum wage? Starvation? When there is NO upward mobility available, even when you are holding an MBA or other degree, advanced or not, your smug, learn to get better wages is simply another phony slogan to fool yourself with. Dood, white collar jobs were being outsourced…LEGAL SERVICES were outsourced to India. Those better paying jobs have not come back. So where are all those better jobs to move into with all that hard work you think is so wonderful? As I stated before, it doesn’t have to be that way, and why konservatives want to make it another nightmare of Fascism is beyond sane consideration.

          • Lockmanxo

            I;m not stealing anything from anyone. UNearned funds are NOT entitlements. I have a lot of compassion and help those out, I do not feel that is a federal government task. Not in the constitution. Your ignorance is showing. Feds are to deal with Federal stuff, the rest belongs to the States. Read the 10th amendment. I don’t want to starve others nor make them “miserable” I just want them OFF the government UNearned dole, and in the work force. Meanwhile I know people who are 3rd generation on the dole. The ONLY way to break that cycle is cuts until they decide that working with assistance beats the dole. As stated what does it teach their children. How to manipulate the dole?

          • Jon Glass

            You talk the talk but fail to walk the walk. You claim to have a “lot of compassion” but have none when it comes to seeing that the children, elderly, disabled, and working poor have no safety net for living. Hell man, you back policies that refuse it even for the military, such is your “largesse.” Your actions speak for themselves, and you fail to realize that before they became unemployable for whatever reason, they paid for what they are receiving. Reality really seems to have a liberal bias these days.

          • Lockmanxo

            Yes I actually have more, as I KNOW beyond a doubt, that a JOB and WORK will not only TEACH others, but their children etc as well. You wish to only do handouts. Give someone a fish, food for today, teach them to fish, they have food for many days. Now I see your are down to the bottom, now I’m a racist, with some half asian some half black, some heinz 57 grandchildren. That’s OK, been called that before, even by some who later apologised when they grew up and learned I actually helped them to excel beyond their wildest dreams. Same as I did my OWN children at times, tough love, you want, you earn. NO free lunch. But first they needed to LEARN.

          • Jon Glass

            More pithy aphorisms born of cornpone philosophy. Dood, teach a man to fish and he will spend every day down by the water trying to catch one. You seem determined to distort what I said to you. I was giving an example of your logically flawed claim of knowledge regarding multiple generations on the dole and how it compares to the equally mythical “black friend” of southern racists. So quit playing the victim..but then righties are notorious for demanding accountability for everyone but themselves. Stereotyping the poor does not make one a racist. The biggest recipients of foodstamps are poor white people in the Red states…you know..those states that are busy implementing the policies for the poor that you back? Thank god for SNAP eh?

          • Lockmanxo

            Actually I think SNAP is a terrible program, born by RATS to BUY votes with tax dollars. LEARN what “assistance” WAS and should return to, EXcess American ONLY farm commodities. No going to the supermarket and getting whatever you want, only excess farm goods. Don’t like fatback, cornmeal and flour, TOO BAD, get a job. Dood, have you ever seen what the world outside does to eat? Most people outside USA would love to get a sack of beans, I distort nothing, I cut through liberal hogwash to show what it really is, as it doesn’t actually “help” the poor, it makes them slaves to handouts. IE look at FACTS, when extended unemployment was cut off, and welfare CUT, suddenly people go look for a JOB.

          • Jon Glass

            What does it teach? It teaches us that you are totally out of touch with reality. You dont help with assistance for working Americans. SNAP is helping working Americans…but YOU are for policies which cut such support making the FALSE claim that they are doing nothing. quit peddling bullshit. the stats dont match your deluded fantasies.

          • Carl Peal

            Glass, have you ever had welfare recipients tell you to your face that they are better off on welfare than working? I have, repeatedly over my lifetime. Welfare was not intended to be a way of life, but it has become just that for multiple generations within families. That is fact. IMO, whether you like it or not, welfare should be cut to subsistence only, and tied to training programs to gain job skills. I will go further. IMO there should be no welfare. It should be ended, and let the Churches and Charities resume the role of providing charity. They can do so much more efficiently. Remember one thing…. Welfare is government charity. It is OUR tax dollars that pay for it against our will. That is tantamount to theft. I have a heart, and there are people that need assistance for life. I am not against special programs for them, but I don’t think we need a dependent class. I fear your views are misguided, but you try to advance them under the guise of being a humanitarian. Wake up and face facts that we can’t continue to fund everything. Cuts have to be made across the board with a few exceptions like defense. But if you feel differently, perhaps you will donate all your income to support illegals? Go for it. I wish to keep what little I get.

          • Jon Glass

            Mr Peal your opintion does not match reality. This has long been a problem for right-wing dittoheads such as yourself. Again..the average stay on welfare is 4.5 years and show that it has NOT become the “way of life” that you prefer to fantasize that it is. Charity is NOT theft. Get a dictionary Mr Peal. The only thing resembling your fictive and nonexistant “dependent class” are the elderly and disabled who cannot work…the children, leave the stats behind as they mature and matriculate into the work force. Tell yourself some more lies Mr Peal.

          • Carl Peal

            Perhaps you should research. Find out what the real impact of raising the minimum wage will be. Protesters are demanding $15/hr, and that is an unreasonable amount that will cause loss of jobs and hours, and a significant increase in the costs of products and services. Even liberal economists concede that. You do the research!

          • Jon Glass

            Mr Peal you are peddling more right-wing falsehood. Studies HAVE been done and have shown that there is little to no impact on jobs or hours or even a “significant increase in costs of products and services”

            I suggest you start taking your own advice regarding doing the research.

            But since you havn’t and won’t, here let me assist you with a few studies to get you started:

            “The Most Rigorous Research Shows Minimum Wage Increases Do Not Reduce Employment” — raisetheminimumwage

            “Today, the most rigorous research shows little evidence of job reductions from a higher minimum wage. Indicative is a 2013 survey by the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business in which leading economists agreed by a nearly 4 to 1 margin that the benefits of raising and indexing the minimum wage outweigh the costs.” — ibid (From here on, all summary statements are taken from the same source while direct reference to the source studies are provided)

            STUDY: Why Does the Minimum Wage Have No Discernible Effect on Employment? — Center For Economic and Policy Research

            SUMMARY: “Reviews the past two decades of research on the impact of minimum wage increases on employment: this study CONCLUDES THAT THE WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE POINTS TO LITTLE OR NO EFFECT OF MINIMUM WAGE INCREASES ON JOB GROWTH.

            The study also finds that a review of the minimum wage literature commonly cited by minimum wage opponents is flawed because it is subjective, relies in large part on studies of wage increases in foreign countries, and fails to consider the most sophisticated and recent minimum wage studies.”

            STUDY: Do Minimum Wages Really Reduce Teen Employment?

            Accounting for Heterogeneity and Selectivity in State Panel

            Data — Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.

            SUMMARY: Examines every minimum wage increase in the United States over the past two decades—including increases that took place during protracted periods of high unemployment—and finds that RAISING THE WAGE FLOOR BOOSTED INCOMES WITHOUT REDUCING EMPLOYMENT OR SLOWING JOB CREATION.

            The research demonstrates how a body of previous research—one frequently relied on by business lobbyists who oppose minimum wage increases—inaccurately attributes declines in employment to increases in the minimum wage by failing to sufficiently account for critical economic factors.

            STUDY: Minimum Wage Effects Across State Borders: Estimates

            Using Contiguous Counties — Institute for Research on Labor and Employment

            SUMMARY: “Provides the most sophisticated study to date of the effects of increases in the minimum wage on job growth in the United States.

            Taking advantage of the fact that a record number of states raised their minimum wages during the 1990s and 2000s – creating scores of differing minimum wage rates across the country – the study compares employment levels among every pair of neighboring U.S. counties that had differing minimum wage levels at any time between 1990 and 2006 and FINDS THAT HIGHER MINIMUM WAGES DID NOT REDUCE EMPLOYMENT.”

            STUDY: Why “Good Jobs” Are Good for Retailers — Harvard Business Review

            SUMMARY: “Harvard Business Review study by MIT Professor Zeynep Ton documents how major retailers such as Trader Joe’s and Costco benefit for higher sales revenue and profits than their low-wage competitors by investing in their employees, which reduces turnover and boosts productivity.

            For example, the starting wage at Trader Joe’s ranges between $40,000 and $60,000 per year, more than twice what many of its competitors offer, and yet the sales revenue per square foot at Trader Joe’s are three times higher than the average U.S. supermarket.”

            This should be enough to get you started Mr Peal.

            I am finished doing your homework for you — work that you should have done yourself.

      • Carl Peal

        Whether you like Dana’s views or not, that is a growing sentiment in the nation. It is not racist unless you choose to view it that way, in which case perhaps you are the racist here. If you study history, you will find that Ellis Island and other similar sites at ports of entry were designed to vet immigrants…. to make sure they didn’t pose health risks to US citizens, and that they had the means and/or skills to be self sufficient so as not to be a burden on taxpayers. That should still hold true to this day. Please note that there was nothing racial in that. Most of the people subjected to that vetting were white Europeans. But if you feel that illegal immigrants should be given preference over about 4.5 million people waiting to immigrate to here LEGALLY, then perhaps you are part of the problem, or perhaps an illegal yourself? Study your history, understand the reason why there are immigration laws. Then make your apology. IMO you need to.

        • Jon Glass

          You forget the fact that there was a great flood and a great depression which changed how people looked at inflicted poverty created by the very government that MANDATED by the Constitution to provide for the general welfare. That is one of the parts of the Constitution that you and the teapublicans seem to hate so much, but you find that congress is mandated by the Constitution in article 1, Section 8a of the Constitution of the United States to provide for the General Welfare and is authorized to levy taxes for purposes of the same. So the question you SHOULD be asking, is why are you, and those like you, enemies of the Constitution. Havnt the fighting men and women of our armed forces taken an oath to defend the constitution against enemies such as you?

          • Lockmanxo

            Idiot go real the Federalist papers. The “general welfare” was meant as HARMONY between states, not free handouts as implied by libtards too ignorant to read.

        • dragontech64

          Apparently, you miss that calling all undocumented immigrants “uneducated, unskilled, unmotivated” is making a negative comment about the group, based on race, not on the individual’s level of education, skill or motivation. That would be the very definition of racism.

    • cezook

      You don’t speak for the American taxpayer, you only speak for yourself, and in the process bare your own lack of education and reasoning skills. Those people are taxpayers too, and they contribute to the economy. If the ignorant fools ever were to be able to get all the undocumented immigrants deported, this country would sink into the deepest depression ever.
      So get a clue and remember that Google is your friend.

    • Jon Glass

      Why not actually research what is going on? The EA does not make illegals citizens. An Executive Action does NOT make law..it is NOT BINDING. So it appears that the lawbreaking uneducated, unskilled and unmotivated folks we have to support are people like yourself. And you should be fighting tooth and nail to get the truth intstead of nourishing yourself on whatever floats to the top of your political propaganda cesspool or making it up out of your butt.

      • Lockmanxo

        You are really stupid if you believe that totally. The action itself is to make it impossible to undo.

        • Jon Glass

          I am not sure I follow…what is impossible to undo? the Executive Action? If you think that, then you really need to read up on what an EA is. It is NOT binding and can be undone. Lets move onto your next lie of denial please.

          • Lockmanxo

            Obama’s ACTIONS would grant work permits AND thereby SS numbers, tax credits, and refunds. WRONG! Illegals should NEVER receive a work permit, that is for LEGAL immigrants to receive rights. UNconstitutional action.

          • Jon Glass

            You still dont get it do you. You whine about all the illegals in the country yet you insist on cutting funding for agencies to do anything about it. You cant have both dood. The bill is for keeping families of AMERICAN citizens together by granting deferred status and TEMPORARY certs. This move is NOT unprecedented, and when your beatified saints such as Reagan and Bush 41 did it…you didnt whine at all. You thought it was WONDERFUL!!! And the EA does NOT give them amnesty when your people DID give them amnesty. tsk tsk tsk

          • Jon Glass

            PS before you try to tell us what is right and wrong regarding the EA, you really owe it to yourself to see what depts are under the purview of the Executive Office which allows them to be directed by the Executive. It appears all those depts you are saying cannot be directed to do this and that, apparently CAN.

  • 1American2

    There is so much ignorance in the party of hate (repub) , all they spew is lies and more lies.

    • AJLoca

      You should check the vote tally for the Civil Rights Act. Tell me again who is the party of “hate.”

      • Jon Glass

        Mr Loca you should check the defection of the Dixiecrats and southern white supremacists from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party dood. They all went GOP on you. Grand Dragon David Duke quit trying to run for Prez on the Dem ticket and has been running on the GOP ticket. The teapublicans have been electing white supremacists and neo-nazis to pubic office, and what have the white supremacists been doing being hilited at the CPAC a couple of years ago and what where they doing having a “luncheon” at the last CPAC? Face it. Your side has become the party of neonazis, kkk, neoconfederates, white supremacists and other white trash of hate and racism. How can we tell? Because the Teapublicans have been using the same exact formula of rhetoric as used by the WW II NASD of Germany and the Fascists of Mussolini. That’s why it has become so attractive to the extremist hate groups.

  • Lockmanxo

    What a crap article. “This is because President Obama actually wants to keep families together.” So we have someone here ILLEGALLY send funds from ILLEGAL employment to an ILLEGAL person smuggler, to bring a non citizen minor child across the border ILLEGALLY, and then DHS sends the child ILLEGALLY to the ILLEGAL parent. ???? Deport BOTH. Parent violated OUR laws and further violated OUR laws with the child and we “reward them? I’m all in favor of deporting them together.

  • Lockmanxo

    Did the author note that over 1/2 of the states joined the lawsuit? Ever hear of MAJORITY?

  • Joe Langella

    This blogger and anyone who buys this lie is really brainwashed and has never read our Constitution.
    First of all the judge is 100% right.
    This unlawful president even said it 22 times on TV that what he did was unlawful it could not be more clear the president can not make like law only enforce it.
    He can use, executive privilege to suspend deportation temporally but can not issue work permits or social security cards that is where he broke the law.

  • Ricardo Rebelo

    It’s the rule of law! Get used to it! Someone needed to stop Emperor Obama!

    • Tina Marie Morrow

      You destroy any minuscule bit of credibility once you called him Emperor Obama. Grow up!

    • Jon Glass

      Really Mr Rebelo? Tell us, exactly how is an Executive Action BINDING? Show us you are worthy of being an American Citizen.

  • MascisMan

    Claiming that the 26 states involved are “Teapublican” is ridiculous.

    Here are the other 25 states involved in the lawsuit. Plenty of which are blue or were blue in 2012. In fact, this is a rather bipartisan group..

    Alabama
    Arizona
    Arkansas
    Florida
    Georgia
    Idaho
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Louisiana
    Maine
    Michigan
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    South Carolina
    North Dakota
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    West Virginia
    Wisconsin

    “Thanks Republicans! I’ll remember this when I hit the polls in 2016…”

    This coming from the person with this in her bio:

    “She has a degree in Criminal Justice and is a proud, loud Liberal.”

    As if she were voting any other way in 2016.

  • Daniel Spain

    I think they should pass certain criteria if here for 5 years or more.But if here a year or less send em back. All should get no IRS returns for the next 10 years regardless of what they made to pay fines for entering illeagally and using any welfare programs paid for by United States citizens for other United States citizens.

  • AJLoca

    If you’re in the country illegally, you are not an American. So YES… this action DOES protect American Families…. it protects them from spending tax dollars to help those who skirt the law. If only our Muslim President was as concerned about the people who BELONG here. Shannon…. you need help.

    • Jon Glass

      Get a clue. The Executive Action does not make the existing illegals citizens. You are thinking of the Amnesty given illegals by Reagan and Bush 41. If only you were as concerned about the truth as you are about the lies you prefer to nourish your character on, you might not need the help that you are only too willing to project such need on others.

  • Jon Glass

    Quit lying. Dems lost because they typically do not vote in great numbers in the midterms and because gerrymandering works.

  • Jon Glass

    Yes Mo there is already legal process..but your tyrants cut funding for the ability to enforce the immigration laws, which is why The Evil O extended prosecutorial discretion to ICE as to which sections it deems best to enforce. The current Executive Action is a similar delegation of Prosecutorial Discretion. You are really ignorant of both the Constitution and US Immigration law arent you. Are you sure you are an American Citizen? You sound more like an illegal immigrant trying to pass for a citizen but has no clue about Americas laws or the Constitution. So what country did you sneak over from? Honduras? El Salvador? The Land of Nod?

    • Lockmanxo

      The O is commander in chief. Can he not send all our returning veterans, or many of them to our border for OUR security? Typical libtard, always about money. Meanwhile this action is in direct OPPOSITION to current LAWS. Potus is to ENFORCE law AS IS, not rewrite that. If he wishes the law to change, the get off HIS high horse, and go meet with congress, as past presidents and leaders have done. He doesn’t tell US what to do, we tell him.

      • Jon Glass

        False. It is not in opposition to current laws. the EA does no rewrite the laws…it allocates prosecutorial discretion to ICE to decide which laws to enforce and where since your people CUT the funding that would get enough people to enforce all the laws. You created the problem and now whine about the consequences and try to blame everyone and everything except the policies that YOU created which caused the problem in the first place. Again…since you are so ready to tell him what to do…try telling US how his EA is binding. EAs are NOT binding so why are you peddling the falsehood that his EA is writing new law when it clearly is not?

        • Lockmanxo

          Fakse, READ the LAW. Correct your ignorance. Plan to secure border. A send military personnel along the Southern border, So far Canadians are real decent about crossing legally. Use the military to assist border officials, as well as do the actual deportation; IE send to and LA port and load those crossing illegally home, not just across the border, but to southern Mexico and further down nations. Charge the cost to any “aid” we were going to “give” to that nation. Others, a one way ticket on a slow boat, again charged from any aid. Take the funds being expended to move them across US to other relatives to sending out, Second make it a low class FELONY to re-enter, and block any chance of staying to those who do. DUI? Immediate deportation. period. Accident, driving, no license? Immediate deportation, within 5 DAYS, as other nations do.

          • Jon Glass

            Mr Lockmanxo, unlike you, I HAVE read the laws. But you seem not to have read that your people made cuts to outfits like ICE etc to make it IMPOSSIBLE to enforce those laws. Your babble about how the Canadians are real decent about crossing legally does NOT take into account the French, the Czechs, the Poles, the Serbs, the Russians, the Rumanians, the Hungarians et all coming across the Canadian border ILLEGALLY…or the Chinese and other Asians coming ILLEGALLY across our western border..or the Central and South Americans as well as Cubans coming ILLEGALLY across our southern border or the Cubanos, and Haitians and Dominicans, and others coming across our EASTERN borders ILLEGALLY. Dood. study your military history. We have yet to fight on a 54,000 mile front…and this is what you are proposing we do..man a 54,000 mile front 24/7 with all the support staff and resources IN ADDITION to the resources needed to pursue, try and convict the 11 million already here. And you people whine about Obamas Federal Deficit that he has actually cut in half? Good lord man,have you gone insane? How much do you think such an adventure would cost? Do you not realize it would send our federal and national debts into outerspace?

          • Lockmanxo

            Well if you the actually knew hoe to read, then you would know that Obama’s actions are Unconstitutional. Now you say one sidedly “:my people” meaning WHAT? Do you mean where CONGRESS in a (note bi ) bipartisan manner that cut many budgets with the SEQUESTER proposed by Obama??? Now as to your babble about all these French, Poles, etc which if there are, are very FEW, unlike the thousands daily crossing the southern border. A liberal sees a pipe drip, and a broken pipe, they work on the drip then cry WE NEED FUNDS due to the flood. Conservatives want to fix the pipe FIRST. And pump OUT the water. Meanwhile YOUR guy is the one and YOUR side has added the additional TRILLIONS to the debt, always conservatives have to stop or at least slow the deficit flow. Holf? Obama PROMISED WHAT???? By the way DooD dy , go back to school dude…

  • Lockmanxo

    Hey “cupcake” Your statement is BS “These 11 million immigrants in this country have been here for years-waiting on their visas, their legal status, their citizenship all because politicians don’t want to do the right thing and FIX this problem.” These are 11 million ILLEGALS that have and should not have any legal status except deportation for breaking OUR laws. You want status? OK my put. Any illegal entrant granted the ability to stay will have a FELONY conviction and be permanently banned from citizenship, SS, Welfare. or ANY federal government program, and further any children they may have will not receive citizenship except one with a LEGAL immigrant or American. However they may self geport to their home nation and apply LEGALLY and get in line.

    As to “Love your fresh vegetables? Thank an illegal immigrant. Love your manicured lawns? Thank an illegal immigrant. Love having an inexpensive nanny to look after your children? Thank an illegal immigrant.” Hogwash, I’ll pick my OWN vegetables, or those who come and work legally after Americans go to work, I’ll cut my OWN grass, care for MY lawn, and I never had a nanny. I’d rather pay a little more and force lazy welfare bums to go to work.

  • Guest

    You seem to be a bit confused. The Executive Action by Obama is not an amnesty program. You are thinking of Bush 41 and Reagan. The EA provides prosecutorial discretion to depts such as ICE to decide which laws to enforce since it has proven impossible to enforce them all with existing resources due to budget cuts by the GOP. It is about law abiding immigrants who have resided here for 5 or more years who are either parents of an American citizen or are children of an American citizen to have deferred status and qualify for temporary work permits. This would free up resources to better enforce existing laws regarding those illegals now coming across as well as to hopefully address the other 6 million who are here illegally.

  • Jon Glass

    You seem a bit confused. The Exectuve Action does not give anyone amnesty. You are thinking of your heros, Bush 41 and Reagan.