We Now Know What The CIA Really Knew About Iraq. Will We Continue To Blame Obama For ISIS?

We’ve known for awhile that the Iraq war was based on a series of massive lies. The 9-11 Commission Report showed that, along with various declassified documents and other investigations and reports. The CIA, however, has now declassified most of the primary report that Bush & Co. used to justify invading Iraq, and it further destroys their talking points, and some conservative talking points now. If we invaded Iraq based on lies, then the truth is, we should have stayed out. How is ISIS Obama’s fault?

Well, the simple answer to that, which we’ll no doubt keep hearing, is that he should have cleaned up Bush & Co.’s mess properly by keeping our troops there until the region was “stable.” However, we also have this issue: If we hadn’t invaded Iraq to begin with, what would be happening there now?

According to Vice, the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) that Bush & Co. kept citing as their justification for invading Iraq, and that the CIA “released” before but redacted nearly everything in it, shows conclusively that our intelligence on weapons of mass destruction was not especially trustworthy. The same is true of Iraq’s connection to Al Qaeda.

As Vice reports, as the NIE went up the chain of command, its shaky conclusions were increasingly treated as concrete. In other words, it sounds like the higher it went, the more officials read or listened only to the parts they wanted. In fact, former CIA analyst Paul Pillar said that very few officials and members of Congress actually read the report itself. Most of them just read the five-page summary.

Pillar also said the NIE didn’t influence Bush & Co.’s decision to invade Iraq. They’d already made that decision.

Even so, the NIE itself was deeply flawed. It was thrown together too quickly. Despite the flaws, as Vice puts it, “[T]he magnitude of the questionable evidence had the effect of making the NIE more convincing and ominous. The basic case that Saddam had WMDs seemed more plausible to analysts than the alternative case that he had destroyed them.”

In other words, not only did we not take the time to do our homework properly, but we also put forth a massively flawed report that admitted its conclusions were questionable as concrete fact. Now, the vacuum left when we pulled out of Iraq gave rise to a group that, according to USA Today, is too extreme for even al Qaeda.

Kirsten Powers pointed out a pertinent fact in USA Today, which is that if we needed to keep troops there for more than a decade to maintain stability, then Iraq was anything but stable. All the cries of upsetting Iraq’s newfound stability are ridiculous in the face of that.

General Michael Hayden spoke to Newsmax, and said the vacuum was Obama’s fault as well. Obama, he says, didn’t continue to mentor the new Iraqi Prime Minister the way Bush did. The implication is that the mentoring would have helped to continue stabilizing Iraq, and may have caused Nouri al-Maliki to sign a new Status of Forces Agreement in 2011. The fact that we pulled out then was because al-Maliki refused to sign a new agreement, so we had no choice but to pull out.

Former Secretary of State and CIA Director Leon Panetta also criticized Obama for pulling out of Iraq too soon. CBS News reports that he “feared” the situation was still too unstable there. In fact, everyone who believes that ISIS is Obama’s fault says something about pulling out of Iraq too soon, or failing to support and supply Syrian rebels in a timely manner (as Hillary Clinton has said).

The fact remains, however, that as terrible as Sadaam Hussein was, he was pretty secular, particularly for the region. ISIS may never have gained a foothold in Iraq if we’d left bad enough alone, and concentrating on fighting against those who were actually responsible for 9-11.

Instead of working to find solutions to ISIS, the war hawks who hate having a peacenik in the White House are busy laying blame. Perhaps they should look at the full history of the situation, and make decisions accordingly, instead of playing the blame game.

 

Featured image by Helene C. Stikkel for the Department of Defense. Licensed under Public Domain from DoD website

Send to Kindle
  • mellowjohn

    i’m shocked.

  • hardwroc

    The very least that should be required is for those criticizing Obama for “pulling out our troops too soon”, to explain how THEY would have made Malicki sign a new SOFA, against the wishes of the Iraqi leadership. IF they haven’t an answer to that, that makes sense, they have no credibility to second guess this president for following an agreement made by his predecessor.

  • Jim

    If they had just stayed on point and gone after Bin Laden, many lives would have been saved and our countries reputation and economics would not have fallen so far.

  • Thom Lee

    We won’t. They will. He also caused WWI and WW II

    • yellowdogdemocrat

      LOL :D

  • jthawke

    The only people to blame about ISIS terrible acts are members of ISIS

    The USA has no control over ISIS, so no one in USA is to be blamed for their terrible acts

    Face live some things you can’t control

    The battle cry should be, get out of the U.N.

    • http://www.phnxboards.com/ James McAllister

      The word ‘vacuum’ must have gone over your head. Nothing on this earth happens in a vacuum. You think the catastrophic destabilization that we caused in the region had nothing to do with the subsequent extremism? I don’t think anyone is trying to say that ISIS murdering, raping, and pillaging is the fault of a specific person, but saying “oh well, we have no control over them, it’s out of our hands” is extraordinarily irresponsible given what we put those countries through.

      Why would leaving the UN be the solution to ISIS?

      Why did I waste my time responding to you?

      • jthawke

        What should the USA give to ISIS that would cause them to quit murdering, raping, and pillaging ?

        The USA has no control over them

    • congressive

      The secular Ba’athist army had ISIS fanatics under control. Bush/Rummy/Wolfowitz dismantled the Ba’athist army and killed a lot of innocent Iraqis in the process, some of which were family members of Ba’athist soldiers.. Subsequently, ISIS flourishes. No, you Republican @ssholes created this mess. The battle cry should be, indict the neocons, and make Republicans pay for the devastation they created. Ooo, some Dems voted for the war, too, you idiots shout. Based on the lies they were fed.

      The depths of denial these fukcers will go to…

      • jthawke

        The Ba’athist army never had ISIS under control

        Killing people is their goal

        If ISIS had control of the whole world , they would continue killing for the fun of killing innocent people

        • congressive

          Jesus. ISIS didn’t exist under Ba’athist control because they couldn’t. ISIS are ucking fidiots, but they had no chance to organize under Saddam because he was a secular ucking fidiot.

          Never mind. History is hard. Why not just go shopping?

      • jthawke

        I think you should consider checking in to a mental Institution

        • congressive

          I think you should spend less time sitting around polishing your gun *wink* and more time in the fact-based universe.

  • NURREDIN

    Here’s the big thing most people miss about ISIS.Prior to the invasion,they were just a bunch of goat herders with AK47’s preaching the Wahabist gospel. Then Bush/Cheney had the bright idea of disbanding the Iraqi army,firing all the Sunni officers,denying them their pensions,banning the Sunni Baath party from the elections,and telling them they couldn’t even vote. Then Bush/Cheney’s hand picked idiot Maliki kicked all the Jews,Christians,Sunnis, Kurds,Agnostics and Atheists out of the government,hiring only Shiites.Then he tells Obama that any remaining American troops will have to operate under Sharia,and Obama says NO. Meanwhile, The Iran/Iraq/Syria oil pipeline is announced, with financial backing from Russia,China, and South Korea. The Sunni monarchies hire ISIS,The Taliban and Al Qaeda to topple Assad,whom they consider the weakest link in the Shiite pipeline. The Qataris purchase Khaddafi’s weaponry and ship it to ISIS. ISIS starts killing Christians,Jews,Sunnis,and religious minorities in Syria. Assad breaks out the WMD, and The Taliban and Al Qaeda quit the fight,saying ISIS is NUTS. ISIS flees to Iraq,where all those unemployed Sunni officers and government employees take the monarchies’ money and train ISIS into a real fighting force. 800 ISIS fighters defeat 5000 Shiite Iraqi troops and take all the equipment we gave them when the Shiites run in terror. .Which brings us to where we are today. You can’t lay the blame for this mess on anyone but Bush/Cheney.

  • AnOuthouse

    One person who should have pulled out sooner is H.W. Bush.

  • AnOuthouse

    Remember Cambodia? We never learn.