This Video Is All The Proof You Need That Republicans Are Out Of Touch With Reality (VIDEO)

Out of all of the things that seem to drive Republicans crazy about the Obama presidency, nothing makes them crazier than the Affordable Care Act, or as they branded it, Obamacare. Since day one, Republicans have told the most outrageous lies about the healthcare law. It contains “death panels.” Health insurance rates will skyrocket. And, maybe the scariest of all, as America tried to climb out of the Bush recession: Obamacare is a “job killer.”

Now, after 60 straight months of private sector job growth, you would think that Republicans would drop the “job killer” line about the ACA. But no, that claim is alive and well, even though the GOP’s favorite news source, Fox News, acknowledges that the country is in an historic era of job growth.

In a brilliant piece in the Huffington Post, Michael McAuliff analyzes the Republicans’ refusal to admit that Obamacare has not harmed the job market. He points out that, thanks to the phenomenon known as “cognitive dissonance,” Republicans simply will not acknowledge that their doomsday predictions about the ACA and job growth have not materialized. In fact, many now spin the job growth numbers to claim that the recovery would be stronger were it not for Obamacare.

North Carolina Republican Virginia Foxx said in November 2009 that the ACA could cost as many as 5.5 million jobs. She was only off by 17 million or so, as the economy has added about 12 million jobs since March 2010, when Obamacare was signed into law.

Watch the video to hear what Republicans had to say about Obamacare when it was being debated in congress. That is followed by a segment of clips, mostly from Fox News, talking about the robust performance of the economy. Then, listen to some of those same Republicans, in a series of brief, on the street interviews, continue to insist that Obamacare is hurting job growth. It’s hard to tell who is more delusional; these Republicans in congress, or the voters who keep electing them.

Here’s the video, via Huffington Post:


Image via Fibonacci Blue/Flickr

Send to Kindle
  • Carol Clinch

    Not anything to comment on-same old, same old ignorant Republicans.

    • Joe Langella

      Carol Clinch
      That`s because you can`t break the argument that the A.C.A. is a failure
      If you could you would so you just demonize and blame others for your ideologies failures.

      • Bob Nelson

        Whoa dude. Go geta cup of coffee and wake up. How do you figure the ACA is a failure? Have you read any newspaper stories on how many people have signed up for it? How many previously uninsured people now have insurance? How insurance rates have grown by the smallest amount in decades? How the Insurance companies themselves like it because it brought them all those new customers? The only people who DON’T like it are Republican politicians and blind sheep that believe Fauxnews lies.

        • Joe Langella

          Bob Nelson
          Yes Bob I have read them stories also but also did the research on the true facts.
          Those facts you are referring to are skewed and misleading at best.
          First of all they don’t consider the fact that over half them numbers that signed up had no choice because their policies got canceled because of the A.C.A.
          2) insurance rate or premiums are down but deductibles are up substantial making it actually costing more for those not getting a subsidize break.
          3) Of course insurance companies love it can you blame them? They get a subsidized payment not only for the people that qualify but also get it from the government when their profits fall short taking all the risk of doing business out.
          But who winds up paying for what turns out to be nothing more than welfare distribution when the subsides run out?
          Government Involvement in our health care will not give us better health care,we might have more people covered but there is a vast difference between coverage and health care.

          • 1fullsailkid .

            Over have of those numbers are people whose policies were cancelled? Wrong….Your very first statement out of the gate is 100% false. I didn’t bother reading the rest.

  • Debbie Fritts-Boyce

    Jobs are growing everywhere, it seems, except for up here in Upstate New York. Broome/Tioga counties ain’t seen much, but in the lower paying industries.

    • Paul in Buffalo

      That’s your neck of the woods. Tioga has only 51,000 people in the entire county! Broome? Move to Buffalo. It’s over 4x the size of Binghamton. If you’re thirsty, get out of the desert. If you want a job, you go to it. No one’s going to bring you one.
      Please, get REAL.

      • Debbie Fritts-Boyce

        I’m 61; retired. Who are you telling me where to live? Buffalo sounds like a nice place to visit…. I’m in Broome-home of IBM, EJ, etc. We can and should do more with what we gots, instead of running off to another place that’s probably in worse shape; they just don’t know it yet.

        • Paul in Buffalo

          Lady, you’re the one who said nothing’s happening there. I hear you and feel your pain. Now do yourself a favor. Either run your own home down as in your first post or boost it as in your second. Don’t try to do both. That’s not a winner. As for trying to sound smart by knocking places you’ve never been, STOP. It seems we’ve discovered the problem.

          • Debbie Fritts-Boyce

            Can’t we agree to disagree? All I’m trying to say, we had it good. Why move? Also, are you sure the last one to leave will turn off the lights?
            If you’re happy with the big city, downtown living life, so be it. After all, reports from the papers say the Broome/Tiago area ain’t recovering as well as the rest of the USA. Why do we have to run? That don’t make sense.

          • Paul in Buffalo

            It’s very perceptive of you to realize we are unlikely to agree. I say it’s because we have very different outlooks. You’re talking 61, retired, had a good run, why run now, things don’t make sense. I’m talking 61, retired, things are looking up, and what’s the next adventure?

            With your attitude, your area’s greatest export will continue to be your youth, just as we once joked here. That was then this is now. To each their own.

          • Debbie Fritts-Boyce

            Oh, I forgot. We have a very steady import of NYC Peoples. Seems a former mayor of Binghamton had an agreement with NYC to “send us your tired, your peoples on welfare.”

          • Paul in Buffalo

            Sounds like your ancestors and mine. You see a curse, I see a blessing. What you forgot is to live while you’re alive. You don’t have much time left, sweety. SOMEONE had to be blunt with you!

  • Jack Loganbill

    Love how republicans refuse to accept fact and truth. Republicans, the truth shall make you free!

  • Ron Simonson

    5.6 that’s what we call good now? What about the labor participation rate?

    • Louis Brunyansky

      Ron, that is a potentially good question, as long as the exact same metrics are used for the last 30 or 40 years to present a statistically valid picture. I have seen some who want to use the least favorable metric for Obama and use a much more relaxed standard for his predesesors, especially the Republican ones. The pick and chose your standards approach is usefull when someone is trying to shore up a weak argument, but destructive when the goal is to find out what worked and what didn’t.

    • Phillip Murphy

      5.6% isn’t great, but it’s better than what it’d been. It’s also lower than the long term trendline average- since 1974, unemployment has averaged 7%, and 5.6% is near the lowest low that Reagan achieved. As for labor participation, the late 1970s through the early 2000s was the highest that number had ever been. The 63% or so that it’s at, while low, compared to the 1978-2003 comparison, is historically high- the average, historically, has been 59-60%. So we may be seeing a reversion to the previous historical mean. It’s also been posited by several economists, that the “bubble” from ’78-03 may not have been entirely all good. It coincided with stagnating wages and record household debt, coupled with sky-high interest rates, the result of which, may have precipitated the rise in two-income families. Basically, when daddy couldn’t pay all the bills, mommy got a job. While there still isn’t much wage growth, there are indicators showing household debt starting to decline and savings rates rising. At the very minimum, rather than compensating for increasing bills and costs by either incurring more debt or getting more work, Americans seem to be doing more with less- which isn’t an entirely good thing (it means less consumption, and thus, less production), but nor is it all bad, either (it means more people are living within their means). You’re also seeing a decrease in the number of two income families. Another factor is that the Baby Boom generation, populationally, was larger than either Gen X or the Millennials. Part of the labor participation drop is the result of Baby Boomers exiting faster than Millennials can replace them. The result is that, instead of the wild boom/bust cycles we saw during the ’80, ’90s, and ’00s, we might be settling back into a longer term trend of steadier, longer term, but albeit smaller, growth.

    • Robyn Ryan

      What about all the human misery this law has averted?

  • Joe Langella

    Republican’s are right on this subject. The A,C,A, has been a job killer
    the left is too naïve or gullible not to see it.
    First of all those employment numbers reflect all employment including part time work which is up over 9.3 million since the A.C.A. took effect so take off the 9.3 million added from the 12 million you claim and you have 2.7 million.
    But don`t stop there let`s look at disability claims up 3. 6 million and how about those who`s unemployment ran out add another estimated 6.5 million starting to see the lie this blogger is trying to sell you?
    Then look at the added cost of health care if your not subsidized you might pay less in premiums but your deductibles have skyrocketed and actual health care is worst as it takes longer to see your doctor.
    All the A,C,A, is welfare distribution at best it does not give better health care for the majority of us we would have been much better off fixing Medicaid and some other reforms than do this.

    • Robyn Ryan

      I pay taxes. I would rather my taxes provide health care for needy fellow Americans than pay for drones to bomb weddings thousands of miles away. We godless pagans tend to think like that.

      • Joe Langella

        Robyn Ryan
        I don`t disagree with your premise, I also would rather spend my tax dollars that way.
        But when the government interferes and tries to make things fair
        it always fails to do so as it must make it unfair to someone else to make it fair for the one it`s trying to help.
        T

    • Steven McGaw

      Perhaps you could find health care to treat your inability to use commas correctly.

      • Joe Langella

        Steven McGaw
        Is that the best debate you can come up with?
        Maybe you should concentrate more on the facts instead of superficial pseudo intellectual pabulum that spews from your writings?

        • Steven McGaw

          Correct punctuation is not “superficial pseudo intellectual pabulum,” It is simply correct. It needs no other justification. It’s what educated people do.

          • Joe Langella

            Steven McGaw
            But it is superficial.
            Not everyone is a academic pedigree and that don’t have anything to do with breaking a argument with civil debate.
            If you rebuttal is only on the punctuation of one’s writings and it’s only outcome is to demonize as a result then what would you call it?
            Intelligence don’t just come out of academia it come from using logical rational thoughts and not emotion.
            Your answer was based on emotional outburst and intended to demonize to make you look superior in your mind and not intended to be civil debate.

    • Carol Clinch

      Link to reports giving you this information, please.

      • Joe Langella

        Carol Clinch
        Ya know carol I could supply you with that info but it`s a waste of my time because every time I have done that all I get is excuses to why the facts presented should be discounted in some way.
        I have looked at many figures on this subject and found wide variations on the figures because both sides are trying to defend their position but the best one I found credible was from the new York times an extreme left wing propaganda outlet that confirms my figures go do the research and look at all the data from both sides with a objective point of view to both sides and you will see my figures are close as one can be to the facts.

  • Robyn Ryan

    Their bullshit jobs depend on handing docile, trained workers to corporations. Not fostering democracy.

  • Bill

    If you believe what a Republican says, you are bat shi_ crazy!