Another Conservative Icon Goes Down: Holly ‘Hobby Lobby’ Fisher Admits To Cheating On Her Veteran Husband

Remember Holly Fisher? She is the conservative, Bible totin’, God fearin’, liberal hatin’ conservative who became an instant right wing and social media celebrity last summer after she posted pictures of herself holding a Bible in one hand, and a rifle in the other. Fisher became a favorite with the Fox News crowd thanks to photos like that one, and another, that showed her wearing an anti-abortion t-shirt and holding a Chick-fil-A cup while standing outside of a Hobby Lobby store.

Holly “Hobby Lobby” Fisher cheated on her husband.

But wait, it gets better. Not only has Fisher admitted to cheating on her husband, but the person she admits to having the affair with is Joel Frewa. Frewa is another “family values” sort whose LinkedIn profile says he is currently Communications Director at the TheTeaParty.net. Apparently Frewa has not updated his profile recently, because it seems that he resigned from that position after his tryst with Fisher became public.

Oh, and Fisher’s husband? He’s a combat veteran. Is this her way of “supporting the troops?”

Holly Hobby Lobby is outed by another conservative.

Conservative muck raker Chuck C. Johnson is the person responsible for outing Fisher’s affair. Johnson says, on his site, Got News, that Fisher and Frewa got together on three separate occasions: a “Restoring the Dream” event, a Faith & Freedom conference, and on Election night 2014. Imagine that, two little conservative lovebirds getting all friendly and practicing their family values while at a “Christian” gathering. What could be more perfect?

Of course, Fisher, being a member of the “party of personal responsibility,” ‘fessed up right away, and admitted she was wrong, without qualifications, right? Not exactly.

After at first denying to Johnson that any affair had taken place, Fisher decided to come clean. In a long, rambling Facebook post, explaining her actions to her followers, Fisher, in true conservative style, blamed almost everyone and everything except those dastardly liberals for what she did.

Fisher’s excuses, in order:

  • I was unexpectedly thrown into the political spotlight.
  • I’ve been married since I was 20.
  • I lost my faith in everything, including God.
  • I wasn’t happy with my marriage.
  • I thought my marriage was over.
  • I’ve suffered from depression and anxiety most of my life.

Fisher then tells how, when her daughter came into the bedroom while she was feeling down, she realized that she needed to do something to change. She says:

Right then and there I knew I needed to get off my butt and get on my knees.

But Holly, we thought that getting on your knees was what got you into this mess!

H/T Addicting Info | Image via Facebook

Send to Kindle
  • Nacho Plate

    The only thing that would have made this news better is if she had cheated on her husband with a woman. Or maybe with Michael Moore.

    • george of nazareth

      …in the famous city hotel of bengazi

      • @nal surprise

        …while smoking pot!

        (This game is fun!)

        • george of nazareth

          wearing nothing but a niqab

      • Cthulhu

        Or all of Benghazi.

    • smh

      The only thing that would have made this news better is if she aborted her extramarital sex baby.

  • george of nazareth

    i think the correct spelling of republican is H Y P O C R I S Y

    • btstump

      Yeah, because all humans aren’t hypocrites at some point. ;-)

  • Jeff Nmi Ruiz

    She should have cheated with a mexican,

    Hey wait! I am mexican.I’d do my duty and hit that booty!

    • JKess

      And then your member would fall off because she’s like the one cheerleader from high school who has made it her personal mission to *ahem* improve the morale of the entire football team

      • Jeff Nmi Ruiz

        I was on the football team.

    • Kipco

      She kinda did. The guy she cheated with is Hispanic…and he was married also to a very lovely looking woman.(that’s them below) Bible Barbie was definitely a step down…

      • Fred Barnes Jr

        He cheated on this gorgeous woman with Holly Hobby Lobby?? Dude you are mentally deficient…I hope she threw your lying fundie asshole to the curb and then maybe you can marry your gun crazy whore…then your wife and her husband can get together since they’re both good people and you’re both cheap whores….

        • Kipco

          I know, right? Here’s another picture of her. Damn, this dude is a dumbass. Too much tea does things to your brain and your judgement, apparently.

  • Ty Ellison

    She posted pictures in an effort to deliberately “upset” liberals, and she says that she was “unexpectedly thrown into the political spotlight”? There’s that ‘personal responsibility’ that we can always expect from the Party of Family Values ™.

    • Cthulhu

      Attention whore gets busted seeking more attention. And this guy was Communications director for the Tea Party. Anyone else think she was humping the guy to get more face time and exposure? (Insert Jokes here. Yes, I’m aware some jokes have already been inserted in her.)

      • Greatergreeter

        All those puns…you sir are awesome

  • Bob Connely

    The last line of this article was priceless - truly well-played, sir!

    • SMichaelinRKE

      Took the words out of my mouth!

  • DBow

    Priceless.

  • Joebobjones

    Again, thank you conservatives for being an endless stream of amusement! No thank you for screwing everything else up, like the economy, the nation, and the world. Still, we’ll always have the laughs…

    • Barb

      We have to stop laughing and start voting and getting out people to the polls in local and off-year elections.

  • Glenn Archer

    OK, and what does her affair have to do with conservative support for the Constitutional right to bear arms and the Constitutional right to freedom of religion? Are those Constitutional rights, or any other Constitutional rights any less important because of her affair?

    • Amon Weekes

      Her affair has everything to do with her supposed belief in the sanctity of marriage.

    • Kipco

      Spare us the red herrings. This has nothing to do with any of that. They are separate issues. This is about someone who sold themselves as a Christian moralist who spent her time in the spotlight criticizing others she felt were her moral inferiors, all the while behaving in a very immoral way behind the scenes. She’s a major hypocrite who only admitted what she did after she was caught, who then issued a selfish excuse filled diatribe where she blamed everything but herself for her despicable choices. (Yes, they were choices.) You may now return to suckling the Constitution.

    • Barb

      In the Hobby Lobby case before the Supreme Court she claimed that her entire company with hundreds of employees should not have to offer certain healthcare options due to her views of the sanctity of sexual relations and marriage. What does Hobby Lobby have to do with guns? The Court found that due to her sincere beliefs in the sanctity of sexual relations and marriage she should not have to violate those beliefs to comply with a law. Her whole claim turned on her not having to violate her beliefs in her behavior. But when it gave her physical pleasure and didn’t cost her a dime, she was happy to violate those beliefs.

      • Glenn Archer

        Good analysis, Barb. I think it is clear Holly did not live up to her own standards. However, her case before the SC was about her church’s stand on abortive contraceptions, not adultery or non-marital sex. But the main point I want to stress is that the actions of one person should have no impact on Supreme Court rulings on our Constitutional rights and freedoms. One person sleeping around vs Constitutional rights and freedoms for over 300,000,000.

        • Barb

          If I understand your position properly, then, if a law required I pay for contraceptives, and I use them myself, by I am a member of a church that forbids them, I should be exempt from the healthcare law due to my membership. Is that correct? The basis of the forbidding of contraception is that sex and marriage are sacrosanct, and you should not, e.g., spill seed on the ground. Hence, no condoms. Forbidding, e.g., the pill, which prevents the release of an egg, but not the use of a thermometer, which tells you when an egg has been released, is more of a mystery to me, since they both appear to use the same approach to the same end. However, I decided to try to respond to your comment on the assumption your question was sincere. I wanted to clarify what folks were reacting to.

          • Glenn Archer

            Barb, I responded to you and not the others because you kept it respectful and tried to think through the issue logically. Thanks for keeping it classy. Actually, my personal position is that this is a hugely complicated issue with valid constitutional arguments on both sides. My intent was to keep people focused on the real issue (constitutional rights and freedoms) without being sidetracked by one women’s personal problems. I don’t appreciate articles like this one that lower the debate and encourage personal attacks, gutter sniping, smearing, ect. Take care!

          • JKess

            no..there is no valid constitutional argument on the right wing side here.

            Why?

            Because the contraception mandate has existed actually since December of 2000 and neither the conservatives or Hobby Lobby had any problem with it until Obama came along.

            Hell Mike Huckabee and other republican governors signed state laws with their own contraception mandate.

            So pray tell..how do they have a valid constitutional argument when they sat there for over ten years mandating the same thing?

            And if HL’s religious beliefs are so important to them..then shouldn’t they stop getting most of their products from China and shouldn’t they stop investing in companies that create the so called abortificants that they oppose?

          • Glenn Archer

            JKess, your reasoning is sound, but I think I’m not sure about the contraception mandate since 2000. To clarify, are you saying employers (more than 50 employees) were already required to provide employees with health insurance that had to include abortive contraceptives since 2000? Because before the Obamacare mandates, I don’t think insurance policies were required to cover any contraceptives, except for other female health issues. But every state has it’s own insurance commission, so some states might have. Where is your source? If you are right, you made a great point. If not ……

          • Barb

            Glenn, there were definitely requirements in some states. Again, she opposes ALL contraceptives, and your repeated insertion of the ‘abortive’ is misleading at best. You claim your views are complicated, but your insertion leads me to think they are more misleading than complicated. Unless you define all contraception, including, e.g., the pill, as ‘abortive’ in which case a simple statement to that effect will clarify matters.

        • Barb

          Also, I understand her to be against ALL contraceptive, not abortion. The health care law doesn’t cover abortion. And as far as I know, she wasn’t only trying to avoid the morning after pill. Studies show that, without intervention only about 1/3 of fertilized eggs implant.

    • JKess

      it has to do with how conservatives constantly claim they’re oh so morally superior and for “family values”

      Oh and btw..conservatives only think they have the right to bear arms and that they only have the right to freedom of religion.

      They have no problem in denying, for example, blacks the right to bear arms and have no problem in denying non Christians the right to freedom of religion.

      • Glenn Archer

        Nuts. For a second there, I had you confused with a reasonable person. My mistake.

        • JKess

          and do you deny that conservatives love waving the “family values” and “we’re more moral” banners?

  • Fishbone

    I stand by my picture taken mid 2014…

    • Fishbone

      Yea!

    • BurningBeard

      That poor guy walking out thinks you hate him now.

      • Fishbone

        I yelled, “Sorry, dude! That wasn’t for you!”

  • GBTG

    Oh my she sins, guess what, even pastors sin. We all fall short liberals.

    • Louise

      Yes, everyone sins even non believers according to believers but to shame people who do what you feel is wrong, to call them names and pass severe judgement on them then turn around and sin yourself is hypocrisy. A lot of religious people I know neve rjudge those around them out of respect for their fellow human being and for their god because they know that what someone does with their life is not your right to judge so their sins are just normal because they are not being a hypocrite.

    • Tilghman Lesher

      Not everybody sins at a conference where the theme of the conference is “Family Values”. It’s one thing to have an indiscretion in a moment of weakness. It’s another thing entirely to do so in a place where she (and her co-cheater) had to effectively IGNORE the message she was there to promote.

      If she was just sinning, that’s a personal matter and it ought to stay that way. But the hypocrisy of where it occurred was just too striking.

    • Steven Espenza

      This is sort of the exact reason behind the Bible’s phrasing of “Judge not, lest ye be judged.” She spent her time in the spotlight judging gays and women who have abortions and/or simply want birth control to keep from having to face the choice of an abortion in the first place. She chose to place her “Christian Values” on a pedestal above all others in an orgy of pride and arrogance and is now reaping what she sowed.

      Pride goeth before the fall, as her book says.

    • decrepittex

      We all fall short but most of us don’t run around spewing “family values” while carrying a Bible and a gun. Get over it GBTG, she’s a sinner and a f**king hypocrite. Had she just STFU no one would have noticed.

      • GBTG

        As if liberals are not hypocrites. You probably want the death penalty for her.

    • Marc Thomson

      YES, So she has no moral ground to tell us gay people should be discriminated against, or when a soul enters a fetus, and needs to keep her lubricated little hands off of my civil rights!

    • Kipco

      We do, but when you are a sanctimonious jerk selling yourself as being of greater moral fiber while sneeringly looking down your nose at those you label as your moral inferior, and then get caught with your pants down, literally, you deserve what you get. What astounds me is how so many people on her team have rushed to defend her, yet were the same people slinging all sorts of horrible insults at Sandra Fluke just a short time ago when she did nothing wrong. Ms Fluke broke no vows, wrecked no one’s home and harmed no one. Ms. Fisher is a megalomanical selfish fraud who harmed her own family and someone else’s. She has also made no apologies to the other man’s wife, either. She made her bed, literally, now she gets to lie in it.

      • Dom Saunders

        Correction: She gets to lie in it “again.”

        =)

    • Kipco

      It is not remarkably difficult to not have an affair. Making the choice to do something you KNOW is wrong is not “falling short”. it’s being selfish. She is not the victim here. The real victims are the spouses who trusted that their spouse would honor the vows they made on their wedding day to forsake all others.

    • JKess

      the problem isn’t that she sins, child..the problem is that she ran around claiming to be oh so morally superior and oh so for family values.

      If you conservatives would stop that “family values” nonsense and if you guys would stop pretending you’re morally superior then we liberals wouldn’t have to sit here and point out how very hypocritical on those subjects your side really is.

      You bring it upon yourselves. You want it to stop? Then stop placing your heads on that proverbial chopping block.

      • GBTG

        As if liberal politicians don’t run around yelling “ban guns” but has a private security force protecting them.While we have to rely on the police that is every bit of an hour away. Maybe you would like to stone her to death.

        • JKess

          i have yet to see any liberal politician say all guns should be banned. of course I could point out that the Republican messiah..Reagan..was in favor of gun control. Curious how your side didn’t run around screaming he was a dictator coming for all the guns.

          But tell me..why are republicans oh so for guns everywhere..except in the state capitols or Congress? If they think I should have to deal with drunk armed people in my local bar then shouldn’t I also get to go into where they are similarly armed?

          No I don’t want to stone her to death. I just simply want her to recognize her hypocrisy and practice some of that “personal responsibility” your side loves to preach and I would also like your side to recognize the hypocrisy and knock off the “family values/morally superior” bullshit.

    • JKess

      GB, let us know when conservatives stop selling themselves on the “family values we are morally superior” ticket.

      Then what you say will apply.

      Until then when they run off their mouths about family values and have affairs at family value conferences and act as if they’re morally superior to everyone else…

      ..then when they “fall short” it becomes fair game.

      Especially when your party spent years trying to impeach former President bill clinton over an affair.

  • Tillmann Puschka

    these “christians” are simply full of shit.

  • Joanie Hepsworth

    Christian in what sense then? Only the hateful way seems to me.

  • John Berg

    She is finding out she is just human.

  • Barb Winslow

    This is great! :D :D :D

  • Anna Huff

    It is never ok to comment on someone else’s marriage. We’re not there, we have no idea what her life is really like. Let’s disagree with her political ideologies, but don’t make petty personal attacks even if she is making it really easy. Leave the lady and her husband alone. We don’t need to attack them to prove that we’re better.

    • JKess

      then get her, Anna, to agree that her so called family values bit is nothing but pure hypocrisy.

      Sorry..when they run around claiming they’re oh so morally superior and that they’re the party of family values then when they fail to meet that standard it is very much relevant and on the table for us to criticize.

  • Kim

    I wonder if she used birth control?

  • LubecLou

    Fear not, Hobby Lobby still doesn’t have to provide full health care to employees becuz their Xtian Values

    • JKess

      but they can still buy all their products from china and still invest in corporations that make the “abortificants” that they object to.

  • grasspress

    i’ve been following the christian ‘right’ for a long time and i’ve concluded after years of study and based on incontrovertible factual information that can be quickly and easily verified, that they should henceforth be referred to as the christian ‘wrong’.

  • lheurebleue

    …and eating pork rinds

  • JKess

    except the US Supreme Court ruled that companies can refuse to pay for all contraception now.

    And as for Hobby Lobby..considering that HL has no problem in getting most of its products from China..a country with forced abortion and invests in corporations that make the “abortificants” it objects to…how sincere can their religious beliefs be?