Six Telling Studies Show How Conservative And Liberal Minds Are Wired Differently

That tricorn hat is on too tight!

Maybe you have an uncle who repeatedly cites the need for war and violence whenever something bad happens in the world. Or an old high school friend who will mourn the death of fetal tissue but denounce children relying on welfare to eat. No matter how many statistics or actual facts you throw their way, they just don’t seem to understand where you’re coming from as a liberal.

The struggle is real, and it’s frustrating to have two reigning ideologies in the country that are polar opposites. It has liberals and conservatives alike banging their heads on their desk screaming, “WHY!?”

The answer is in the minds of conservatives and liberals. Our minds, emotions, intelligence and experiences all dictate our choices and focuses and many scientists have studied subconscious and conscious reactions to certain issues, topics or stimuli that might explain this vast difference in reasoning (or lack thereof).

Six studies that explain the difference between liberal and conservative minds:

6. Conservatives are more easily disgusted:

A study from 2011 found a “stronger disgust response” in conservatives rather than liberals. Participants were asked their political ideology and were then tested based on how disgusting they found certain scenarios (e.g. sipping a soda to find an acquaintance drank out of the same glass). Conservatives showed higher levels of disgust in the Core Disgust area which is linked to sexual attitudes. This sensitivity to disgust response could also come into play when deciding on issues related to religion, homosexuals, homeless people or the extremely poor, and abortion.

The study indicates:

Disgust seems especially likely to affect judgments of acts that are related to sexual, bodily, or spiritual purity. For instance, individuals made to feel disgusted are more likely to report that taboo sexual behaviors are morally wrong (Horberg, Oveis, Keltner, & Cohen, 2009) and are more likely to report negative feelings toward social groups associated with these behaviors (such as gay men).

Which goes to show many Conservatives may be directly hindering same-sex couples rights on the basic fact that they find them “icky.”

Meanwhile, Liberals are like:

RiffRaff

5. More activity in brain of liberals when presented with conflict:

Scientists from a 2007 study tested left- and right-wing participants on how they process conflict, and the results showed that conservatives and liberals react much differently when presented with conflict.

The participants were asked to press the letter ‘M’ on a keyboard when the letter ‘M’ appeared onscreen and to do nothing when the letter ‘W’ appeared. Each test subject were electroencephalograph that recorded activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, an area of the brain that processes conflict between repetitive motions, like pressing a key and appropriate responses.

The study found those with liberal leanings had more activity in their anterior cingulate cortex and also had more correct answers, which means they were able to process stimuli much more effectively.

Frank J. Sulloway, Professor at UC Berkeley’s Institute of Personality and Social Research, told the LA Times:

The results could explain why President Bush demonstrated a single-minded commitment to the Iraq war and why some people perceived Sen. John F. Kerry, the liberal Massachusetts Democrat who opposed Bush in the 2004 presidential race, as a “flip-flopper” for changing his mind about the conflict.

4. Studies indicate right-wingers are less intelligent:

Dumb and Dumber

When former Republican Senator Rick Santorum said, “We’ll never have the elite, smart people on our side,” he was actually right. Broken clock and what not.

A study conducted in 2012, with 15,000 participants, had their intelligence tested during childhood, the participants then took a test on their political leanings when they reached adulthood. The study showed that lower intelligence in childhood resulted in racist, homophobic, and sexist views in adulthood. The study also showed that regardless of education level or social status innate intelligence dictates how accepting a person will be towards people different from themselves. Lower intelligence in childhood also meant a person was likely to identify more with the right-wing side of politics.

Score for the liberals!

3. Conservatives have a “negativity bias”:

If Fox News is any indication, conservatives lean strongly towards negativity. The channel is pretty much a 24-hour fear machine, whipping their viewers into a froth over even the most mundane topics.

In this study participants were hooked up to an eye-tracking machine that measure autonomic responses of pupil dilation to measure a person’s reaction to certain stimuli (an open wound with maggots, a spider on a scared person’s face, etc.). The test found that participants who leaned conservative reacted much more quickly to the negative images showing an innate physiological reaction to fear. Which makes sense given the right’s propensity for a well-funded, large military, tougher law enforcement, being adverse to illegal immigration and guns, guns, guns!

The results of this test were accepted widely within the scientific community.

2. Conservatives don’t get the joke:

 

In a study called The Irony of Satire, researchers set out to prove Conservatives don’t get the joke. Using The Colbert Report as a barometer, researchers showed the obvious left-leaning comedian acting as a severe right-winger to participants and then asked them several questions after the episode.

From the study:

Results indicate that political ideology influences biased processing of ambiguous political messages and source in late-night comedy.

Meaning conservatives didn’t get the joke, they really thought Colbert meant all his jabs at liberals, because the information was too ambiguous for them to interpret and so they interpreted it the way they were most comfortable. People tend to see what they want to see and follow information that agrees with them. However, Conservatives were much worse at separating their natural bias from the reality of the information being presented to them.

1. Conservatives have larger “fear centers” in their brain:

Fox News

A study of MRI scans between students identifying as conservative or liberal shows a slightly larger amygdala in the brains of conservatives. The amygdala is mainly responsible for fear, and so it makes sense if the amygdala is larger in conservatives why they fear silly threats like Ebola after only a few cases in the U.S.

The study also goes to show that smaller fear centers would naturally lead to a more adventurous lifestyle, a hallmark of Liberals who are more open to new experiences and different people.

Together we make a whole team.

It’s important to have wary, order-driven people on a team, just as it’s important to have logical and adventurous players. These studies only show our differences but combining conservative strengths like organization, order and security with liberal strengths like creativity, innovation and intelligence has worked to human civilization’s advantage for a very long time to create this world in which we live. However, if you’re looking to simply win an argument against your uncle with Celestial Seasonings tucked into his tricorn hat, it most likely will not happen because of the way in which stringent conservatives are emotionally, cognitively, and physiologically wired.

H/T: Buzzfeed | Photo: The Tea Party Express

Send to Kindle
  • Daniel Björkman

    If all this is true (and I think it is, and it is not the first time I’ve heard it either), then I would have to say that I have a very conservative mindset. And I am not sure I see anything very wrong with that. Of course I’m afraid of everything, everything is out to kill you and eventually it will succeed! :P But because I realise that, I also realise that no amount of paranoia will ever keep you completely safe, and that in fact paranoia is, in itself, something you should fear.

    I suspect the final paragraph of this article is the truth of it. We need conservatives - *sane* conservatives. We need people who say, “hang on, can we talk about this first?” when others want to implement their cool new idea. What we don’t need is what we have now, which is conservatives who seem to want to burn down half the world just so that they won’t have to feel so scared.

    I understand where they come from, probably better than most liberals. I’m scared too! I want more than anything to feel safe too! But safety is something that you can never fully have, and if someone pushes for some extreme measure that he claims will increase your safety, then the sensible thing to do, the *conservative* thing to do, is to say, “hang on, can we talk about this first?” And conversely, if someone suggests some modest measure that you are worried will make you less safe, the conservative thing to do is to say, “okay, I won’t sign off on that just yet, but we can discuss it.”

    Cautious. Rational. Methodical. That is supposed to be what “conservative” means. And those sound like pretty damn great things to me, if only we could have any self-proclaimed conservatives that actually practised those things.

    • Terry Burns

      I totally understand and agree with what you are saying to a point. What this article doesn’t address is the concept of the convert. Where one who could have been on one side in a period of life. Then later on move to the other side; like in my case. In my youth, I was very fear driven, and did vote conservative. In addition, I was also in the military at the time. Over the years, as I gained the open-mindedness resulting from the experiences of life. I then switched to more liberal views. As I’m older now one of my motto’s is “each to their own” kind of thinking realizing the necessity of difference. What I’m complimenting you on is that your open-mindedness trumps your fears. Thus, still leaning liberal although we both have some conservative values.

    • Tammy Harper

      Cautious, yes. Sometimes. Methodical, definitely. Rational, not a chance. You appear as a pretty cautious & rational individual, which are good qualities. You do seem to lean on the paranoid side, but the great thing about you is you know this & accept it & you try to learn from it. This is what differs yourself from most Republicans in the political arena.
      With respect, I do have to disagree w/ your opinion on Republicans being the ones that want to, “hang on & talk about it first.” They are usually the ones who don’t want to change anything or compromise, even when the other side has given up so much . We have learned this from all of the previous compromises during the spending plan debates, when we had our credit devalued, our political foundation scrutinized & our country almost losing their govt. for a period of time. All because the Republicans wouldn’t compromise.

      • Daniel Björkman

        Believe me, I know. My argument was that the conservative mindset, as a psychological phenomenon, is a perfectly reasonable and even valuable thing - while at the same time I thought I was pretty clear that the way it expresses itself in most conservatives of today goes so far that it becomes self-defeating. I am not defending what they are, only what they should be.

        For what it’s worth, I consistently vote liberal, because what choice do I have? Conservatives of today are so scared of criminals that they want the right to shoot anyone who looks at them funny, so scared of terrorists that they give the government the right to imprison and torture people without a trial, so scared of communism (which hasn’t been a serious political power for thirty years, for fuck’s sake!) that they’ll sell their social safety net out to the corporations… the list goes on. Well, I’m scared of criminals and terrorists too (not so much of communism, I admit), but not nearly as scared as I am of what this bunch of panicking nitwits are going to do in their constant state of overreaction.

  • Pingback: I wish I had the luxury to be a conservative Republican | Homeless in LA ©()

  • Tammy Harper

    As a liberal, I wasn’t surprised by the results. The only thing that bothered me was they didn’t disclose who did all of these tests & in most cases, if they were biased before conducting them on their volunteers. They would say scientists performed a test or a study was done. But, they wouldn’t say who conducted the study.

  • kbsamurai

    Even though I would identify myself as liberal, I would be very skeptical of articles like this that make a lot of generalizations. I’ve met very smart conservatives and I would never underestimate them. I just disagree with them. I’m also older, and grew up in a family that is mostly pretty conservative, though what was conservative way back then would be in the middle or slight on the left compared to what passes for mainstream conservative today.

  • Ridge Rat

    You forgot to mention that a right winger is more likely to actually have the knowledge of how to hook up a solar panel.