Insurance Companies Freak Out As Colorado Prepares For Single-Payer Vote

The notion that America is still the only modern democracy on the planet that doesn’t guarantee its citizens basic healthcare is pretty f’ng lame.

Well, Colorado might soon change that…

As one of the first states to legalize and relate marijuana, Colorado is already a pretty badass state. Realizing that Washington is run by a bunch of stubborn man-children who represent the Cousin Eddies and Gordon Gekkos of the world, Colorado is poised to deliver single-payer healthcare to its residents-courtesy of efforts by ColoradoCareYES.

It seems the grassroots group garnered the necessary signatures, sponsoring a proposed overhaul of the pre-existing health care system to the state earlier this year, meaning it can now appear on the ballot.

In a statement released by ColoradoCareYES, Senator Irene Aguilar (D-Denver) agrees that families should have a say when it comes to their health care:

Colorado deserves a better option, and now they can vote on one. Health care costs continue to rise every year, hurting Coloradans’ chances to get ahead. It’s time we get the insurance industry out of the driver’s seat and put families in charge of their health care.

It should be noted that Vermont experimented with single-payer, though it was ultimately scrapped by Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin, a longtime single-payer advocate, after a financial report showed the cost of the program would nearly double the size of the state’s budget in the first year alone. But unlike Vermont, Colorado is lush with state revenue from marijuana sales and clearly has a readily available means to fill gaps in the budget.

But should the measure pass, it would fund itself through a new 10 percent payroll deduction. That means employers would pay 7 percent of the tax while employees would cover the rest. As a result, people would no longer be bombarded with burdensome individual premiums, deductibles or most co-pays. In such a scenario, Coloradans would still choose their own medical providers, but their bills would be covered by the state. According to the grassroots group, savings would come via reduction in administrative costs-a major cost driver in healthcare- as well as permitting a negotiation of bulk rates for pharmaceuticals. It’s believed that this will result in $5 billion in savings.

While this experiment failed in Vermont, and the insurance industry is hoping it fails in Colorado as well, Coloradans are a real unique people. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 11 percent of Coloradans are presently uninsured. A lot can change from now until election day, but Coloradans might just be enthusiastic enough to give it a try.


Featured image via Public Citizen/Flickr

michael hayne headshotedited111 Michael is a comedian/VO artist/Columnist extraordinaire. Follow him on Twitter, Facebook, and ImpressionsGuy.com

  • Pingback: Latest news | Health Care Is a Human Right - Washington()

  • Robert L

    Sounds just like the Canadian single-payer system.

    • Amy Wisniewski

      do I know if this is true or not? no- but a patient of mine had a stroke, stated he would have had to wait months just for a ct scan- let alone treatment. we all know time is brain. so they drove fast to the US, where they have dual citizenship and health insurance, and an immediate stroke alert was called, and he did well. My fear is who the single payer will be, who will administrate it, and who will oversee that physicians and practitioners are doing the right thing. I have no love loss for a lot of insurance companies, but I wouldn’t want to jump into the fire

      • Brandon Rowell

        I am from Florida and we have many Canadian visitors every winter (Snow Birds). They have said the medical care is great. They said it was a bit sketchy the first couple of years while it was first getting worked out and you may wait for an elective surgery like a boob job, but all other medical care is better there than it is here in the US. They say people in the US keep quoting things from the beginning of their single payer plan, but won’t tell Americans about how wonderful it is now.

        • Amy Wisniewski

          that is very good to hear. But I still fear in America where things have not been managed very well that whoever is in charge of this single payer system will muck it up so badly that our medical system, although expensive, will stop being one of the best in the world. We save people that other countries can’t. I’m proud of that.

          • alaskanexile

            It’s not. It’s not one of the best in the world. Why do you keep repeating ignorance? Are you paid?

          • Amy Wisniewski

            because I work in it. I see what the physicians and nurses do, or could do if insurance companies would let them. We have the resources, the knowledge base, we have it. It is just run so badly that people don’t see it. Often times our hands are bound by an insurance company saying “no”. that cannot be! And one of the U.S.’s biggest issues is lack of care, lack of families taking care of their family, and having all these freaking nursing homes. we need to start taking care of mom and dad- not shipping them off. You do not see that in other countries, and that is a social issue, not a medical one.

          • Robert L

            I believe that one of the biggest problem Americans have with a single-payer system is that they assume that it will be run by the federal government, and that Canada runs it that way. The truth is that Canada’s single-payer system is not run by the Canadian government but rather is run by the individual provinces. I think that should be the case here in the US. A form of single-payer is already being run by the State of Massachusetts called MassHealth, and it’s been very successful so far in providing quality health care and coverage to people who don’t have private medical insurance. I don’t see why the other 49 states can’t do the same. It would be far easier to manage at the state level than at the federal level.

          • Lacey Gentry

            Single payer run by the states would work great for anyone who doesn’t ever travel outside of their state- much like Medicaid works pretty well for most poor people. Problems arise when you start having people who need their coverage to be portable across state lines so that they can access medical care at the same cost while traveling for work or pleasure. My husband lives in one state and works in another- and he had a heart attack on his way to work a few months ago. My best friend’s husband has several medical issues- and he travels all over the country for his job. The problem with single payer administrated by the individual states is that we’d be reliant on those states to cooperate with one another to make sure our medical bills get paid when we end up needing medical care outside our home state- which you can ask the people on Medicaid about if you want to know how well the states have managed that so far.

          • Amy Wisniewski

            I can tell you as a case manager that medicaid across state lines does not work at all. We can’t get authorizations, we can’t get assistance, the answer is just no. Just like when my sister in law broke her arm in Canada- the answer was no, and she had to pay the bill. So many things to work out, and that scares me because I have seen it from a nursing side, a case manager side, and an insurance company side.

          • Amy Wisniewski

            My concern is that the states or government will task this off to an already in place insurance company- because that would be much easier than building their own. They did it with medicaid, they chose 1 company to administer it. Where I live they chose Geisinger, a bunch of ill equipped greedy horrible people. And they weren’t prepared for the amount of people that would be coming to them. Employees quit because suddenly instead of handling 30 patients accounts, they were handling 300. Employees had nervous breakdowns because administration did not care. I’m so glad I got out of there. That’s my concern. Our government isn’t good at asking the experts, the true experts for help and how to set something up, what is important. They pick people like Geisinger.

      • alaskanexile

        Liar and an idiot

        • Brandon Rowell

          It isn’t nice to call people names. That is very juvenile behavior.

          On the subject, you are correct that our healthcare system is no longer one of the best in the world. In fact, people leave the US to get treatment in countries that are much more advanced than our own.

        • Amy Wisniewski

          and this right here is the problem with the U.S. We have people like this. Do you work in healthcare? Do you see this every day? I do. read above.

  • lisa

    If the voters say yes, give it a try. With the extra tax income from legal pot sales, and if overhead costs can be controlled as the proposal says, it might work. It may take a few years to iron out the wrinkles, but go for it, Colorado!

  • Ponta Vedra

    Everybody should stop focusing on the increased governmental budgets and begin noticing the vastly reduced personal spending. Sheesh, it’s like the latter doesn’t even take place. They should also note that a single-payer system could make much stronger negotiations with drug companies; with that and the fact that the end of profit-taking, the increased costs for government will likely be much less than what the public as a whole saves on the system.

    Why do we continually fear taxes so irrationally that we would rather pay a $100 bill to a corporation than pay a $10 tax to the government?

  • Ben Wilson

    Sounds just like the Australian first payer

  • Ben Wilson

    Sounds just like the Australian single payer

  • alaskanexile

    Too awesome, go Colorado