Boehner Upset That Obama Isn’t Waging Fruitless And Expensive Wars

No, we’re not The Onion-we’ve just reached such a point of depravity and insanity in government from which there’s no return.

John Boehner, who has the awkward role of having to calm down the mouth-foaming Teapublicans in the House while still remaining steadfastly Baracknaphobic, actually called President Obama an “anti-war” president.

As if that were a bad thing. In fact, that’s like being upset at someone for being anti-poverty or anti-AIDS. Oh wait, Republicans are in favor of both of those things. Never-mind.

The world is starving for American leadership. But America has an anti-war president,” the Ohio Republican told reporters. “We have no strategy, overarching strategy, to deal with the growing terrorist threat. And it’s not just ISIS or Al-Qaeda or all of their affiliates. We’ve got a serious problem facing the world and America, by and large, is sitting on the sidelines. (TPM)

Actually, the only people starving are the working class and poor. Further, the people who are literally starving on account of your sociopathic fellow Republicans, once again, trying to balance the budget on the backs of the poor by gutting food stamps. Also, President Obama helped killed some insignificant guy named Bin Laden. You know, the guy who was ACTUALLY responsible for the worst terror attack on America that President Bush ignored in countless memos. Also, Obama has overseen ongoing U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, even launching a sweeping drone war in Pakistan as well as military actions against Libya, Syria, Yemen and Somalia.

In short, what the leaky and perpetually drunk orange really means is that America’s neocons are starving for permawar to ensure their defense portfolios remain as fat as they were during the Bush years.

H/T: TalkingPointsMemo|Featured image by Michael Hayne of IfYouOnlyNews.com

 

 

Send to Kindle
  • David Bailey

    Boots on the ground, Mr. Boehner, is that what you and your compadres want? If so, then YOUR boots, and those of your children and your friends’ children, go first.

    • Kenneth Henderson

      Agreed, when the rich Republicans start sending their boys and girls to the front, then maybe I’ll be in support of your wars. (Still, probably not, I am in no support of war that is for greed and profit, which sadly, most wars are for.)

  • kittykat

    Cuts to education, college aid, medicare, medicaid, medical research, infrastructure, repeal ACA (but no plan B in 5 yrs.).
    Refuse to increase tax on corporations or close loopholes. FYI, Boeing, G.E.,Verizon paid no taxes. Also loosen regulations, Dodd-Frank Act, on the Wall Street Banks.Increase funding to military.
    OK and that is with our best interest. It’s candycoated for those that don’t look any further.