Scott Walker P*sses Off His Sons With His Anti-Gay Bigotry

A week and a half ago the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples had a right to be married just like everyone else thanks to the Equal Protection Clause. It was a long-awaited victory for millions of people in this country who had been discriminated against for far too long; and while liberals rejoiced, conservatives had an absolute meltdown. They were so angry that they would no longer be allowed be allowed to use Republican Jesus as an excuse to discriminate, that their heads all but exploded. One of the most vocal opponents of the ruling was Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker and his sons are not happy about it.

When the SCOTUS ruling was handed down, Walker blamed “five unelected judges” for redefining marriage:

I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake…The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas.

By “faithfully interpret the Constitution” he means completely ignore the First and Fourteenth Amendments that protect everyone from right-wing hate; but, you know? Other than that small detail.

Well, on Sunday, Scott Walker’s wife, Tonette Walker, told the Washington Post that her son’s, Matt and Alex, were not happy to hear their father speak out against the marriage equality ruling:

That was a hard one,” Tonette said, pausing and choosing her words carefully. “Our sons were disappointed. . . . I was torn. I have children who are very passionate [in favor of same-sex marriage], and Scott was on his side very passionate…It’s hard for me because I have a cousin who I love dearly — she is like a sister to me — who is married to a woman, her partner of 18 years.

It is sickening that a man, who has such a loving and tolerant family, could hold such intolerant beliefs. How awful it must have been for his kids to hear their father spew such hatred. It’s one thing to know your dad is an a**hole privately, it’s quite another when he stands up and shows the whole world how much of a jerk he is.

This man wants to be president, but he let a huge part of our citizenry know that he has no respect for them. I think we’ll pass on Walker and elect someone who understands that the Constitution doesn’t just apply to religious fundamentalists.


 

Featured image via Facebook

  • Missladyhawke ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    It’s not like we can pick our parents.

    • SMichaelinRKE

      Nope, and while I love my father to death, some of his online posts make me cringe for hours - even though it’s not me. Totally understand guys!

  • MyLovelyNose

    I think his kids know that Dad does what he does because he holds public office and the rules for public office are different, as he’s explained to them over and over.

    • Steven McGaw

      I hope his sons know he’s a hate-drenched bigot.

      • Jerry Callender

        Most certainly they do, as he’s crammed it down their throats their whole lives.

    • Paula Ann McCabe

      Yeah, it’s their fault they don’t accept his bigotry.

  • justsaying

    Eventually, what goes around comes around. Scott is demonstrating how it is OK to hate to his children. He may say hate the sin, love the sinner but that is not what any sane person gets out of his rhetoric. They will survive and hopefully take the right side when they are adults.

    • Dave

      So sorry you are suffering from a perverted sexual addiction. Addictions are hard to admit and next to impossible to recondition. You will most likely suffer from improper lust all your life. 12 step programs are available for you to help you recover.

      • justsaying

        i wish there was a 12 step program for ignorance, maybe you should investigate.

      • Jerry Callender

        …and what programs to cure your affliction are you in?

        • Dave

          Ignorance is cured by knowledge. Sexual conditioning, as with all addictions cannot be cured, but they can be managed so that one does not act out. In 12 step work it’s called “recovery”.

          • Jeremiah Brod

            Well funny that because the all of the professional psychological, psychiatric and doctors associations of both the US and the EU say being gay is not a mental disorder, are adamantly against ex-gay therapy (also stating that it does significant and long lasting psychological harm) and fully endorse equal legal rights for LGBT persons. But hey who needs real knowledge when you can just make sh*t up like Dave!

          • Dave

            That shows your ignorance of the literature. No all of them believe that way and many have published otherwise. Only the PC, liberal ones think it’s not a mental disorder.

            And for your information, 12 step groups are not “ex-gay therapy”. Their sexual conditioning is hot wired into their brains and that won’t change but they can stop acting out on their lust.

            Also as far as long lasting psychological harm is concerned homosexuals have the highest suicide rate, and live 10 years on the average less than everyone else. The stats support my contention, not yours. So please do your homework before spouting off.

          • Svein Arne Romestrand

            And why should they stop “acting out on their lust”? Because your Dog tells them to?

      • Joy

        So sorry that you appear to be missing a brain. You will likely suffer from being stupid for the rest of your life. There is no 12 step program available for you.

        • harebob

          He probably thinks that he will go to some fictitious place after he dies because he has been a good boy. This fictitious place will keep him there for all eternity. I do hope I don’t have to go there with him. I cannot imagine a worse punishment than to be stuck with such people for ever.

          • Dave

            You won’t, that is guaranteed. You will be as if you had never existed.

          • harebob

            Thanks, Dave you just confirmed my opinion.

          • Dave

            Yes, I believe in absolutes and natural law. The fact that we exist as personal beings, in my opinion, necessitates a personal Creator and any examination of the cultures of the world suggests there is natural law. I don’t believe there is anyone who doesn’t believe it a virtue of keeping one’s covenants or that one should pay an eye for an eye, tooth for tooth. Any two year old child understands this. It’s innate.

          • Bladewalker56

            Gods are imaginary. Any two year-old child that hasn’t been brainwashed by their parents understands this. It’s instinctive.

          • Dave

            Oh and our existence is imaginary too right? Just popped into existence. Matter + time + chance and we get you right? You got the logic of a rock.

          • Tukgardenguy

            bla bla bla bla. You already lost. OOOhhh look ! kitty cat videos, gtta go.

          • harebob

            I am quite sure that you are correct in your knowledge of what any two year old child understands. You are probably close to that level yourself. However, two year old children will believe any crap that is put to them until they are able to think for themselves. Two examples might be Santa Claus and the tooth fairy. Fortunately, these beliefs are not continually reinforced by adults throughout their life.

  • Papa Bugg

    “who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws” sorry, the law isnt based on faith…… and if thats the case, you better rethink a lot of things

  • trapmoc

    @Shannon, tolerance isn’t being on the right side of history, being on the popular side of an a debate or being a crowned a victor by 5 people. Tolerance is the ability to disagree. The ability of those on the right to disagree drives those on the left crazy, it keeps them up at night, drives them to slander others, attack character, even use the power of gov’t to persecute, prosecute those who disagree with them. What is this behavior? It’s intolerance, it’s hate. Scott Walker does indeed have a differing position on marriage than you. However, “I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake…The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas.” is not a position of hate, it’s a position of tolerance. It’s a position that maximizes the representation of Americans & protects their ability to disagree, protect states rights. We’re the United States, not the United State. Our system allows like minded people create the gov’t that represents them. Unfortunately, people are all too giddy that 5 unelected, unrepresentative people made a decision for 319 million Americans rather than change the hearts & minds of men, go through the political process like states such as Minnesota. Instead many cheer on a court that’s decided to redefine our language, words to go around the constitution. The court is not a legislative body, it doesn’t write law, redefine words, it should take words with their original, unadulterated meaning and apply it through our Constitutional test. The reason we’re in an age of political polarization is because we’ve decide that everything’s a federal issue. Think of it like this blog, most here agree with each other. Hypothetically if we decided that Shannon’s ability to publish another post was put to vote with the people here, it passes over overwhelmingly, while if you combine the vote with those from a right leaning blog she may lose the ability. Then people will become mean, hateful, polarized. We do the same thing in politics.

    The Supreme Court should of refused the case because it was case for the states to decide, if did take up the case it should of challenged constitutionality of marriage as a whole, which there’s little basis. Why should single people not be allowed the same rights as married people, it’s discriminating, giving out extra rights. We already have contract law, you shouldn’t have to be married to enjoy the same benefits. Instead of ending gov’t discrimination we just added another group to the list. We all lost more than we gained & most here don’t even realize it. What happens when Ginsburg resigns? Would you want a court this powerful when the bench is colored red? Nobody should want a court that powerful regardless of color.