CEO Gives Everyone (But Himself) A HUGE Raise And The Company Doubles Revenue

About six months ago, a story broke that a truly egalitarian CEO of a credit card processing company was doing something radical and revolutionary with his company - he cut his own wage from $1M a year to $70k a year and increased every single one of his employees’ salaries to the same level.

Not everyone was happy with the decision made by Dan Price of Gravity Payments in Seattle, Washington. In fact, his brother, as a minority shareholder, sued him and conservatives denounced the decision as “socialism.”

(Harvard Business School professor Michael) Wheeler isn’t as positive about Gravity Payments. Instead of being lauded as a visionary, Wheeler notes how Price became the victim of backlash when Fox Business’s Stuart Varney asked if he was a socialist, and Rush Limbaugh proceeded to do a takedown. “Some customers left, either unhappy with what they saw as Price’s political agenda or worried that the added costs would be passed on to them. Heads of other tech companies complained that he has made them look bad by comparison,” Wheeler writes.

Source: Fast Company

While the court date is still more than six months in the future, Dan’s brother Lucas might want to reconsider and Rush Limbaugh and friends might just want to shut up. While Price might have lost some business, as a net, he gained. In fact, he doubled his business.

Revenue is growing at twice the rate it was before Chief Executive Dan Price made his announcement this spring, according to a report on Inc.com. Profits have doubled. Customer retention is up, despite some who left because they disagreed with the decision or feared service would suffer. (Price said he’d make up the extra cost by cutting his own $1.1 million pay.)

Not surprisingly, his well-paid employees are also sticking around.

Barely any employees have left — although some outsiders, including some commenting on a MarketWatch article about the decision earlier this year, warned that employees could start putting in less effort because everyone is being paid the same regardless.

Bravo to Price. It sort of makes all the controversy surrounding raising the minimum wage to a paltry $10, $11, $12 or even $15 an hour, pretty petty.
Featured image via Gravity Payment.

 

  • Otto Greif

    This tells you nothing about raising the minimum wage.

    • Tony Thompson

      Is there some reason it would? After all, this article isn’t about raising the minimum wage.

      • Otto Greif

        The author claims it does, read the last sentence of the article.

  • Aaron Cooper

    What this article overlook is that in order to achieve this increase the CEO took mortgages out of both his homes, clear out his retirement account, and sold his stock in the company to boost revenue. This will continue to get worse because employees are not motivated if all make about the same income. Wendy try again.

  • Tony Thompson

    Barely any employees have left — although some outsiders, including some commenting on a MarketWatch article about the decision earlier this year, warned that employees could start putting in less effort because everyone is being paid the same regardless.

    I love how this is used as an “argument” against his decision (it often comes up in discussions about ending tipping in restaurants). Because no manager or owner would think about penalizing someone who puts in less effort.

    • Aaron Cooper

      Tony you can still put in effort but just
      enough to keep your job. What about getting promoted to a manager knowing you
      will make the same income but more work, more hours, and more responsibility?
      That is where the argument of everyone should be payed the same falls
      apart.